Cargando…
COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049 |
_version_ | 1783559210613604352 |
---|---|
author | Steiner, Sabine Schmidt, Andrej Zeller, Thomas Tepe, Gunnar Thieme, Marcus Maiwald, Lars Schröder, Henrik Euringer, Wulf Ulrich, Matthias Brechtel, Klaus Brucks, Steffen Blessing, Erwin Schuster, Johannes Langhoff, Ralf Schellong, Sebastian Weiss, Norbert Scheinert, Dierk |
author_facet | Steiner, Sabine Schmidt, Andrej Zeller, Thomas Tepe, Gunnar Thieme, Marcus Maiwald, Lars Schröder, Henrik Euringer, Wulf Ulrich, Matthias Brechtel, Klaus Brucks, Steffen Blessing, Erwin Schuster, Johannes Langhoff, Ralf Schellong, Sebastian Weiss, Norbert Scheinert, Dierk |
author_sort | Steiner, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2–4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of −10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) −5.2%]; P (non-inferiority) < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference −1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI −6.5%); P (non-inferiority) < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73603812020-07-20 COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions Steiner, Sabine Schmidt, Andrej Zeller, Thomas Tepe, Gunnar Thieme, Marcus Maiwald, Lars Schröder, Henrik Euringer, Wulf Ulrich, Matthias Brechtel, Klaus Brucks, Steffen Blessing, Erwin Schuster, Johannes Langhoff, Ralf Schellong, Sebastian Weiss, Norbert Scheinert, Dierk Eur Heart J Fast Track Clinical Research AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2–4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of −10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) −5.2%]; P (non-inferiority) < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference −1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI −6.5%); P (non-inferiority) < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543). Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7360381/ /pubmed/31989155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Fast Track Clinical Research Steiner, Sabine Schmidt, Andrej Zeller, Thomas Tepe, Gunnar Thieme, Marcus Maiwald, Lars Schröder, Henrik Euringer, Wulf Ulrich, Matthias Brechtel, Klaus Brucks, Steffen Blessing, Erwin Schuster, Johannes Langhoff, Ralf Schellong, Sebastian Weiss, Norbert Scheinert, Dierk COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title | COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title_full | COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title_fullStr | COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title_short | COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
title_sort | compare: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions |
topic | Fast Track Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinersabine compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT schmidtandrej compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT zellerthomas compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT tepegunnar compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT thiememarcus compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT maiwaldlars compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT schroderhenrik compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT euringerwulf compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT ulrichmatthias compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT brechtelklaus compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT bruckssteffen compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT blessingerwin compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT schusterjohannes compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT langhoffralf compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT schellongsebastian compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT weissnorbert compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions AT scheinertdierk compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions |