Cargando…

COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions

AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steiner, Sabine, Schmidt, Andrej, Zeller, Thomas, Tepe, Gunnar, Thieme, Marcus, Maiwald, Lars, Schröder, Henrik, Euringer, Wulf, Ulrich, Matthias, Brechtel, Klaus, Brucks, Steffen, Blessing, Erwin, Schuster, Johannes, Langhoff, Ralf, Schellong, Sebastian, Weiss, Norbert, Scheinert, Dierk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049
_version_ 1783559210613604352
author Steiner, Sabine
Schmidt, Andrej
Zeller, Thomas
Tepe, Gunnar
Thieme, Marcus
Maiwald, Lars
Schröder, Henrik
Euringer, Wulf
Ulrich, Matthias
Brechtel, Klaus
Brucks, Steffen
Blessing, Erwin
Schuster, Johannes
Langhoff, Ralf
Schellong, Sebastian
Weiss, Norbert
Scheinert, Dierk
author_facet Steiner, Sabine
Schmidt, Andrej
Zeller, Thomas
Tepe, Gunnar
Thieme, Marcus
Maiwald, Lars
Schröder, Henrik
Euringer, Wulf
Ulrich, Matthias
Brechtel, Klaus
Brucks, Steffen
Blessing, Erwin
Schuster, Johannes
Langhoff, Ralf
Schellong, Sebastian
Weiss, Norbert
Scheinert, Dierk
author_sort Steiner, Sabine
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2–4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of −10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) −5.2%]; P  (non-inferiority) < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference −1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI −6.5%); P  (non-inferiority) < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73603812020-07-20 COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions Steiner, Sabine Schmidt, Andrej Zeller, Thomas Tepe, Gunnar Thieme, Marcus Maiwald, Lars Schröder, Henrik Euringer, Wulf Ulrich, Matthias Brechtel, Klaus Brucks, Steffen Blessing, Erwin Schuster, Johannes Langhoff, Ralf Schellong, Sebastian Weiss, Norbert Scheinert, Dierk Eur Heart J Fast Track Clinical Research AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm(2). METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2–4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of −10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) −5.2%]; P  (non-inferiority) < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference −1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI −6.5%); P  (non-inferiority) < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543). Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7360381/ /pubmed/31989155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Fast Track Clinical Research
Steiner, Sabine
Schmidt, Andrej
Zeller, Thomas
Tepe, Gunnar
Thieme, Marcus
Maiwald, Lars
Schröder, Henrik
Euringer, Wulf
Ulrich, Matthias
Brechtel, Klaus
Brucks, Steffen
Blessing, Erwin
Schuster, Johannes
Langhoff, Ralf
Schellong, Sebastian
Weiss, Norbert
Scheinert, Dierk
COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title_full COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title_fullStr COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title_full_unstemmed COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title_short COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
title_sort compare: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions
topic Fast Track Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049
work_keys_str_mv AT steinersabine compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT schmidtandrej compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT zellerthomas compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT tepegunnar compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT thiememarcus compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT maiwaldlars compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT schroderhenrik compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT euringerwulf compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT ulrichmatthias compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT brechtelklaus compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT bruckssteffen compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT blessingerwin compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT schusterjohannes compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT langhoffralf compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT schellongsebastian compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT weissnorbert compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions
AT scheinertdierk compareprospectiverandomizednoninferioritytrialofhighvslowdosepaclitaxeldrugcoatedballoonsforfemoropoplitealinterventions