Cargando…

Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey

CONTEXT: Melanoma treatment has substantially changed over the last several years, yet little information regarding physician’s preferences around treatment exists. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to describe the results of the CancerMPact (CMP) survey performed in 2019 about the treatment of advanced/metasta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne, Stephanie, Zhao, Linda, Hanson, Madelyn, Kanas, Gena, Davis, Christine, Robinson, David, Turnure, Matthew, Clark, Otavio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S263468
_version_ 1783559217727143936
author Hawthorne, Stephanie
Zhao, Linda
Hanson, Madelyn
Kanas, Gena
Davis, Christine
Robinson, David
Turnure, Matthew
Clark, Otavio
author_facet Hawthorne, Stephanie
Zhao, Linda
Hanson, Madelyn
Kanas, Gena
Davis, Christine
Robinson, David
Turnure, Matthew
Clark, Otavio
author_sort Hawthorne, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Melanoma treatment has substantially changed over the last several years, yet little information regarding physician’s preferences around treatment exists. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to describe the results of the CancerMPact (CMP) survey performed in 2019 about the treatment of advanced/metastatic melanoma. METHODS: CMP is a data source from Kantar, Health Division, containing data on cancer epidemiology and treatment. Once a year, Kantar performs a series of surveys with specialists in the field of interest in the United States of America (USA), Western Europe (WE), Japan, and China. The results of the survey reported in this work comprise the answers from 94 USA and 99 WE physicians about the treatment of melanoma. RESULTS: In the first-line for the BRAF wild-type population, immuno-oncology (IO) drugs including nivolumab, ipilimumab or pembrolizumab (alone or in combination) were used in 80.1% of the cases in the USA and 70.6% in WE. Conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments were used in 16.4% of the USA patients and 28.2% in WE. In the second-line in the USA, 45.8% of BRAF wild-type patients received IO drugs, while 45.0% of patients received conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments. The majority of patients with BRAF mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma were treated in the first-line with BRAF-targeted therapy (61.3% USA, 71.9% WE), and few patients received conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments (11.9% USA, 12.4% WE); the most commonly used BRAF-targeted therapy was the combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib. In the second-line, BRAF mutant patients received IO drugs (45.1% USA, 53.7% WE), targeted therapy (37.6% USA, 32% WE) or conventional chemotherapy/cytokine-based treatments (14.4% USA, 11.7% WE). CONCLUSION: The use of IO or targeted therapy for patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma is the preferred treatment strategy by physicians in the USA and WE based on BRAF mutation status. Many patients still receive conventional chemotherapies or cytokines with unsubstantial benefit, especially in recurrent patients of BRAF wild type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73604272020-08-05 Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey Hawthorne, Stephanie Zhao, Linda Hanson, Madelyn Kanas, Gena Davis, Christine Robinson, David Turnure, Matthew Clark, Otavio Cancer Manag Res Original Research CONTEXT: Melanoma treatment has substantially changed over the last several years, yet little information regarding physician’s preferences around treatment exists. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to describe the results of the CancerMPact (CMP) survey performed in 2019 about the treatment of advanced/metastatic melanoma. METHODS: CMP is a data source from Kantar, Health Division, containing data on cancer epidemiology and treatment. Once a year, Kantar performs a series of surveys with specialists in the field of interest in the United States of America (USA), Western Europe (WE), Japan, and China. The results of the survey reported in this work comprise the answers from 94 USA and 99 WE physicians about the treatment of melanoma. RESULTS: In the first-line for the BRAF wild-type population, immuno-oncology (IO) drugs including nivolumab, ipilimumab or pembrolizumab (alone or in combination) were used in 80.1% of the cases in the USA and 70.6% in WE. Conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments were used in 16.4% of the USA patients and 28.2% in WE. In the second-line in the USA, 45.8% of BRAF wild-type patients received IO drugs, while 45.0% of patients received conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments. The majority of patients with BRAF mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma were treated in the first-line with BRAF-targeted therapy (61.3% USA, 71.9% WE), and few patients received conventional chemotherapy or cytokine-based treatments (11.9% USA, 12.4% WE); the most commonly used BRAF-targeted therapy was the combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib. In the second-line, BRAF mutant patients received IO drugs (45.1% USA, 53.7% WE), targeted therapy (37.6% USA, 32% WE) or conventional chemotherapy/cytokine-based treatments (14.4% USA, 11.7% WE). CONCLUSION: The use of IO or targeted therapy for patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma is the preferred treatment strategy by physicians in the USA and WE based on BRAF mutation status. Many patients still receive conventional chemotherapies or cytokines with unsubstantial benefit, especially in recurrent patients of BRAF wild type. Dove 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7360427/ /pubmed/32765066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S263468 Text en © 2020 Hawthorne et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hawthorne, Stephanie
Zhao, Linda
Hanson, Madelyn
Kanas, Gena
Davis, Christine
Robinson, David
Turnure, Matthew
Clark, Otavio
Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title_full Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title_fullStr Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title_short Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Melanoma in the United States and Western Europe: Results of the CancerMPact Survey
title_sort treatment of advanced/metastatic melanoma in the united states and western europe: results of the cancermpact survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S263468
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthornestephanie treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT zhaolinda treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT hansonmadelyn treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT kanasgena treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT davischristine treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT robinsondavid treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT turnurematthew treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey
AT clarkotavio treatmentofadvancedmetastaticmelanomaintheunitedstatesandwesterneuroperesultsofthecancermpactsurvey