Cargando…

MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools

Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a neurogenetic disorder with an incidence of about 1:33.000. Hallmarks are bilateral benign vestibular schwannomas, which can lead to deafness or brainstem compression. Volumetric tumor measurements are essential to assess the efficacy of new therapies. We present a stati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kollmann, Philipp, Mautner, Victor-Felix, Koeppen, Johannes, Wenzel, Ralph, Friedman, Jan M., Salamon, Johannes, Farschtschi, Said
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68489-y
_version_ 1783559234176155648
author Kollmann, Philipp
Mautner, Victor-Felix
Koeppen, Johannes
Wenzel, Ralph
Friedman, Jan M.
Salamon, Johannes
Farschtschi, Said
author_facet Kollmann, Philipp
Mautner, Victor-Felix
Koeppen, Johannes
Wenzel, Ralph
Friedman, Jan M.
Salamon, Johannes
Farschtschi, Said
author_sort Kollmann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a neurogenetic disorder with an incidence of about 1:33.000. Hallmarks are bilateral benign vestibular schwannomas, which can lead to deafness or brainstem compression. Volumetric tumor measurements are essential to assess the efficacy of new therapies. We present a statistical and methodical comparison of three volumetric image analysis tools. We performed volumetric measurements on phantoms with predefined volumes (0.1 to 8.0 ml) and tumors seen on 32 head MRI scans from eight NF2 patients with BrainLab, ITK-Snap, or OsiriX. The software was compared with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements and time required for analysis. The mean volume estimated by all three software programs differed significantly from the true volume of the phantoms, but OsiriX and BrainLab gave estimates that were not significantly different from each other. For the actual tumors, the estimated volumes with all three software tools showed a low coefficient of variability, but the mean volume estimates differed among the tools. OsiriX showed the shortest analysis time. Volumetric assessment of MRI images is associated to an intrinsic risk of miscalculation. For precise volumes it is mandatory to use the same volumetric tools for all measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73605622020-07-16 MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools Kollmann, Philipp Mautner, Victor-Felix Koeppen, Johannes Wenzel, Ralph Friedman, Jan M. Salamon, Johannes Farschtschi, Said Sci Rep Article Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a neurogenetic disorder with an incidence of about 1:33.000. Hallmarks are bilateral benign vestibular schwannomas, which can lead to deafness or brainstem compression. Volumetric tumor measurements are essential to assess the efficacy of new therapies. We present a statistical and methodical comparison of three volumetric image analysis tools. We performed volumetric measurements on phantoms with predefined volumes (0.1 to 8.0 ml) and tumors seen on 32 head MRI scans from eight NF2 patients with BrainLab, ITK-Snap, or OsiriX. The software was compared with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements and time required for analysis. The mean volume estimated by all three software programs differed significantly from the true volume of the phantoms, but OsiriX and BrainLab gave estimates that were not significantly different from each other. For the actual tumors, the estimated volumes with all three software tools showed a low coefficient of variability, but the mean volume estimates differed among the tools. OsiriX showed the shortest analysis time. Volumetric assessment of MRI images is associated to an intrinsic risk of miscalculation. For precise volumes it is mandatory to use the same volumetric tools for all measurements. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360562/ /pubmed/32665659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68489-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kollmann, Philipp
Mautner, Victor-Felix
Koeppen, Johannes
Wenzel, Ralph
Friedman, Jan M.
Salamon, Johannes
Farschtschi, Said
MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title_full MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title_fullStr MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title_full_unstemmed MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title_short MRI based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
title_sort mri based volumetric measurements of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: comparison of three different software tools
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68489-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kollmannphilipp mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT mautnervictorfelix mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT koeppenjohannes mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT wenzelralph mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT friedmanjanm mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT salamonjohannes mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools
AT farschtschisaid mribasedvolumetricmeasurementsofvestibularschwannomasinpatientswithneurofibromatosistype2comparisonofthreedifferentsoftwaretools