Cargando…

Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise

Astronauts are at increased risk of spine injury. With a view to developing training approaches for the muscles of the spine in microgravity, this study examined the effects of axial loading and postural cues on the contraction of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus in supine lying using a n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Patrick J., Rantalainen, Timo, Scheuring, Richard A., Belavy, Daniel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67509-1
_version_ 1783559270930841600
author Owen, Patrick J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Scheuring, Richard A.
Belavy, Daniel L.
author_facet Owen, Patrick J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Scheuring, Richard A.
Belavy, Daniel L.
author_sort Owen, Patrick J.
collection PubMed
description Astronauts are at increased risk of spine injury. With a view to developing training approaches for the muscles of the spine in microgravity, this study examined the effects of axial loading and postural cues on the contraction of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus in supine lying using a novel exercise device (GravityFit). Thirty (18 males and 12 females) endurance-trained runners without a history of spinal pain aged 33–55 years were recruited. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed under one rest and five exercise conditions, which involved variations in axial loading and postural cues. Whole volume of the abdominal and lumbar paraspinal muscles was imaged and transversus abdominis thickness and length and multifidus anteroposterior and mediolateral thickness measured. Transversus abdominis contraction was greatest in the ‘stretch tall plus arm extension’ (length, − 15%, P < 0.001; thickness, + 19%, P < 0.001) and ‘stretch tall plus arm extension and thoracic cue’ (length, − 16%, P < 0.001; thickness, + 18%, P < 0.001) conditions. The contraction of multifidus was the greatest in the ‘arm extension and thoracic cue’ (anteroposterior, + 3.0%, P = 0.001; mediolateral, − 4.2%, P < 0.001) and ‘stretch tall plus arm extension and thoracic cue’ (anteroposterior, + 6.0%, P < 0.001; mediolateral, − 2.1%, P = 0.022) conditions. This study provides proof-of-principle for an exercise approach that may be used to facilitate the automatically contraction of the transversus abdominis and multifidus muscles. Axial loading of the body, with or without arm loading, most consistently led to contraction of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles, and regional differences existed in the contraction within the muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73607442020-07-16 Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise Owen, Patrick J. Rantalainen, Timo Scheuring, Richard A. Belavy, Daniel L. Sci Rep Article Astronauts are at increased risk of spine injury. With a view to developing training approaches for the muscles of the spine in microgravity, this study examined the effects of axial loading and postural cues on the contraction of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus in supine lying using a novel exercise device (GravityFit). Thirty (18 males and 12 females) endurance-trained runners without a history of spinal pain aged 33–55 years were recruited. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed under one rest and five exercise conditions, which involved variations in axial loading and postural cues. Whole volume of the abdominal and lumbar paraspinal muscles was imaged and transversus abdominis thickness and length and multifidus anteroposterior and mediolateral thickness measured. Transversus abdominis contraction was greatest in the ‘stretch tall plus arm extension’ (length, − 15%, P < 0.001; thickness, + 19%, P < 0.001) and ‘stretch tall plus arm extension and thoracic cue’ (length, − 16%, P < 0.001; thickness, + 18%, P < 0.001) conditions. The contraction of multifidus was the greatest in the ‘arm extension and thoracic cue’ (anteroposterior, + 3.0%, P = 0.001; mediolateral, − 4.2%, P < 0.001) and ‘stretch tall plus arm extension and thoracic cue’ (anteroposterior, + 6.0%, P < 0.001; mediolateral, − 2.1%, P = 0.022) conditions. This study provides proof-of-principle for an exercise approach that may be used to facilitate the automatically contraction of the transversus abdominis and multifidus muscles. Axial loading of the body, with or without arm loading, most consistently led to contraction of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles, and regional differences existed in the contraction within the muscles. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360744/ /pubmed/32665555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67509-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Owen, Patrick J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Scheuring, Richard A.
Belavy, Daniel L.
Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title_full Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title_fullStr Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title_full_unstemmed Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title_short Axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
title_sort axial loading and posture cues in contraction of transversus abdominis and multifidus with exercise
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67509-1
work_keys_str_mv AT owenpatrickj axialloadingandposturecuesincontractionoftransversusabdominisandmultifiduswithexercise
AT rantalainentimo axialloadingandposturecuesincontractionoftransversusabdominisandmultifiduswithexercise
AT scheuringricharda axialloadingandposturecuesincontractionoftransversusabdominisandmultifiduswithexercise
AT belavydaniell axialloadingandposturecuesincontractionoftransversusabdominisandmultifiduswithexercise