Cargando…

Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials

The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcorti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Caballero, Fran, Martin-Trias, Pablo, Ribas-Prats, Teresa, Gorina-Careta, Natàlia, Bartrés-Faz, David, Escera, Carles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733220
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250
_version_ 1783559310773583872
author López-Caballero, Fran
Martin-Trias, Pablo
Ribas-Prats, Teresa
Gorina-Careta, Natàlia
Bartrés-Faz, David
Escera, Carles
author_facet López-Caballero, Fran
Martin-Trias, Pablo
Ribas-Prats, Teresa
Gorina-Careta, Natàlia
Bartrés-Faz, David
Escera, Carles
author_sort López-Caballero, Fran
collection PubMed
description The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcortical activity, but recent evidence suggested cortical contributions which may be dependent on the stimulus frequency. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with an inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), to disentangle the cortical contribution to the FFR elicited to stimuli of high and low frequency. We recorded FFR to the syllable /ba/ at two fundamental frequencies (Low: 113 Hz; High: 317 Hz) in healthy participants. FFR, cortical potentials, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) were recorded before and after real and sham cTBS in the right primary auditory cortex. Results showed that cTBS did not produce a significant change in the FFR recorded, in any of the frequencies. No effect was observed in the ABR and cortical potentials, despite the latter known contributions from the auditory cortex. Possible reasons behind the negative results include compensatory mechanisms from the non-targeted areas, intraindividual variability of the cTBS effectiveness, and the particular location of our target area, the primary auditory cortex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73609242020-07-29 Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials López-Caballero, Fran Martin-Trias, Pablo Ribas-Prats, Teresa Gorina-Careta, Natàlia Bartrés-Faz, David Escera, Carles Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcortical activity, but recent evidence suggested cortical contributions which may be dependent on the stimulus frequency. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with an inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), to disentangle the cortical contribution to the FFR elicited to stimuli of high and low frequency. We recorded FFR to the syllable /ba/ at two fundamental frequencies (Low: 113 Hz; High: 317 Hz) in healthy participants. FFR, cortical potentials, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) were recorded before and after real and sham cTBS in the right primary auditory cortex. Results showed that cTBS did not produce a significant change in the FFR recorded, in any of the frequencies. No effect was observed in the ABR and cortical potentials, despite the latter known contributions from the auditory cortex. Possible reasons behind the negative results include compensatory mechanisms from the non-targeted areas, intraindividual variability of the cTBS effectiveness, and the particular location of our target area, the primary auditory cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7360924/ /pubmed/32733220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250 Text en Copyright © 2020 López-Caballero, Martin-Trias, Ribas-Prats, Gorina-Careta, Bartrés-Faz and Escera. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
López-Caballero, Fran
Martin-Trias, Pablo
Ribas-Prats, Teresa
Gorina-Careta, Natàlia
Bartrés-Faz, David
Escera, Carles
Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_full Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_short Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_sort effects of ctbs on the frequency-following response and other auditory evoked potentials
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733220
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezcaballerofran effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials
AT martintriaspablo effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials
AT ribaspratsteresa effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials
AT gorinacaretanatalia effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials
AT bartresfazdavid effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials
AT esceracarles effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials