Cargando…
Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials
The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcorti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250 |
_version_ | 1783559310773583872 |
---|---|
author | López-Caballero, Fran Martin-Trias, Pablo Ribas-Prats, Teresa Gorina-Careta, Natàlia Bartrés-Faz, David Escera, Carles |
author_facet | López-Caballero, Fran Martin-Trias, Pablo Ribas-Prats, Teresa Gorina-Careta, Natàlia Bartrés-Faz, David Escera, Carles |
author_sort | López-Caballero, Fran |
collection | PubMed |
description | The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcortical activity, but recent evidence suggested cortical contributions which may be dependent on the stimulus frequency. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with an inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), to disentangle the cortical contribution to the FFR elicited to stimuli of high and low frequency. We recorded FFR to the syllable /ba/ at two fundamental frequencies (Low: 113 Hz; High: 317 Hz) in healthy participants. FFR, cortical potentials, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) were recorded before and after real and sham cTBS in the right primary auditory cortex. Results showed that cTBS did not produce a significant change in the FFR recorded, in any of the frequencies. No effect was observed in the ABR and cortical potentials, despite the latter known contributions from the auditory cortex. Possible reasons behind the negative results include compensatory mechanisms from the non-targeted areas, intraindividual variability of the cTBS effectiveness, and the particular location of our target area, the primary auditory cortex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73609242020-07-29 Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials López-Caballero, Fran Martin-Trias, Pablo Ribas-Prats, Teresa Gorina-Careta, Natàlia Bartrés-Faz, David Escera, Carles Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The frequency-following response (FFR) is an auditory evoked potential (AEP) that follows the periodic characteristics of a sound. Despite being a widely studied biosignal in auditory neuroscience, the neural underpinnings of the FFR are still unclear. Traditionally, FFR was associated with subcortical activity, but recent evidence suggested cortical contributions which may be dependent on the stimulus frequency. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with an inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), to disentangle the cortical contribution to the FFR elicited to stimuli of high and low frequency. We recorded FFR to the syllable /ba/ at two fundamental frequencies (Low: 113 Hz; High: 317 Hz) in healthy participants. FFR, cortical potentials, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) were recorded before and after real and sham cTBS in the right primary auditory cortex. Results showed that cTBS did not produce a significant change in the FFR recorded, in any of the frequencies. No effect was observed in the ABR and cortical potentials, despite the latter known contributions from the auditory cortex. Possible reasons behind the negative results include compensatory mechanisms from the non-targeted areas, intraindividual variability of the cTBS effectiveness, and the particular location of our target area, the primary auditory cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7360924/ /pubmed/32733220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250 Text en Copyright © 2020 López-Caballero, Martin-Trias, Ribas-Prats, Gorina-Careta, Bartrés-Faz and Escera. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience López-Caballero, Fran Martin-Trias, Pablo Ribas-Prats, Teresa Gorina-Careta, Natàlia Bartrés-Faz, David Escera, Carles Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title | Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title_full | Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title_fullStr | Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title_short | Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials |
title_sort | effects of ctbs on the frequency-following response and other auditory evoked potentials |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezcaballerofran effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials AT martintriaspablo effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials AT ribaspratsteresa effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials AT gorinacaretanatalia effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials AT bartresfazdavid effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials AT esceracarles effectsofctbsonthefrequencyfollowingresponseandotherauditoryevokedpotentials |