Cargando…

Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review

BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Naoki, Kato, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32684821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318
_version_ 1783559319928700928
author Aoyama, Naoki
Kato, Keiichi
author_facet Aoyama, Naoki
Kato, Keiichi
author_sort Aoyama, Naoki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been established, and this review outlines the clinical use of TE biopsy. METHODS: Based on literature, the method and associated techniques for TE biopsy, a dissection method of TE cells from blastocysts, were investigated. MAIN FINDINGS: Two TE biopsy methods are used, namely assisted hatching (herniating) and non‐assisted hatching (direct suction); however, it is not clear which of these methods is superior. It is critical to understand whether the flicking or pulling method is beneficial. CONCLUSION: Non‐assisted hatching biopsy method may cause blastocyst collapse with a higher probability, and it may extend the biopsy time. The biopsy procedure should be performed within 3 minutes, and thus direct TE suction may have greater disadvantages. It is a fact that pulling method of TE dissection with laser pulse is simple; however, excess laser shots may induce a higher frequency of mosaicism. It is important to understand that each technique of TE biopsy has benefits and disadvantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73609702020-07-17 Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review Aoyama, Naoki Kato, Keiichi Reprod Med Biol Mini Reviews BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been established, and this review outlines the clinical use of TE biopsy. METHODS: Based on literature, the method and associated techniques for TE biopsy, a dissection method of TE cells from blastocysts, were investigated. MAIN FINDINGS: Two TE biopsy methods are used, namely assisted hatching (herniating) and non‐assisted hatching (direct suction); however, it is not clear which of these methods is superior. It is critical to understand whether the flicking or pulling method is beneficial. CONCLUSION: Non‐assisted hatching biopsy method may cause blastocyst collapse with a higher probability, and it may extend the biopsy time. The biopsy procedure should be performed within 3 minutes, and thus direct TE suction may have greater disadvantages. It is a fact that pulling method of TE dissection with laser pulse is simple; however, excess laser shots may induce a higher frequency of mosaicism. It is important to understand that each technique of TE biopsy has benefits and disadvantages. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7360970/ /pubmed/32684821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mini Reviews
Aoyama, Naoki
Kato, Keiichi
Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title_full Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title_fullStr Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title_full_unstemmed Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title_short Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
title_sort trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: a review
topic Mini Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32684821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamanaoki trophectodermbiopsyforpreimplantationgenetictestandtechnicaltipsareview
AT katokeiichi trophectodermbiopsyforpreimplantationgenetictestandtechnicaltipsareview