Cargando…
Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review
BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32684821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318 |
_version_ | 1783559319928700928 |
---|---|
author | Aoyama, Naoki Kato, Keiichi |
author_facet | Aoyama, Naoki Kato, Keiichi |
author_sort | Aoyama, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been established, and this review outlines the clinical use of TE biopsy. METHODS: Based on literature, the method and associated techniques for TE biopsy, a dissection method of TE cells from blastocysts, were investigated. MAIN FINDINGS: Two TE biopsy methods are used, namely assisted hatching (herniating) and non‐assisted hatching (direct suction); however, it is not clear which of these methods is superior. It is critical to understand whether the flicking or pulling method is beneficial. CONCLUSION: Non‐assisted hatching biopsy method may cause blastocyst collapse with a higher probability, and it may extend the biopsy time. The biopsy procedure should be performed within 3 minutes, and thus direct TE suction may have greater disadvantages. It is a fact that pulling method of TE dissection with laser pulse is simple; however, excess laser shots may induce a higher frequency of mosaicism. It is important to understand that each technique of TE biopsy has benefits and disadvantages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73609702020-07-17 Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review Aoyama, Naoki Kato, Keiichi Reprod Med Biol Mini Reviews BACKGROUND: Recently, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology initiated a clinical study of preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy. There will be a great need for a standardized embryo biopsy technique in Japan. However, the gold standard trophectoderm (TE) biopsy procedure has not been established, and this review outlines the clinical use of TE biopsy. METHODS: Based on literature, the method and associated techniques for TE biopsy, a dissection method of TE cells from blastocysts, were investigated. MAIN FINDINGS: Two TE biopsy methods are used, namely assisted hatching (herniating) and non‐assisted hatching (direct suction); however, it is not clear which of these methods is superior. It is critical to understand whether the flicking or pulling method is beneficial. CONCLUSION: Non‐assisted hatching biopsy method may cause blastocyst collapse with a higher probability, and it may extend the biopsy time. The biopsy procedure should be performed within 3 minutes, and thus direct TE suction may have greater disadvantages. It is a fact that pulling method of TE dissection with laser pulse is simple; however, excess laser shots may induce a higher frequency of mosaicism. It is important to understand that each technique of TE biopsy has benefits and disadvantages. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7360970/ /pubmed/32684821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Mini Reviews Aoyama, Naoki Kato, Keiichi Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title | Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title_full | Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title_fullStr | Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title_short | Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review |
title_sort | trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: a review |
topic | Mini Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32684821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aoyamanaoki trophectodermbiopsyforpreimplantationgenetictestandtechnicaltipsareview AT katokeiichi trophectodermbiopsyforpreimplantationgenetictestandtechnicaltipsareview |