Cargando…
Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials
The following systematic review and meta-analysis compile the current data regarding human controlled COVID-19 treatment trials. An electronic search of the literature compiled studies pertaining to human controlled treatment trials with COVID-19. Medications assessed included lopinavir/ritonavir, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00399-6 |
_version_ | 1783559324682944512 |
---|---|
author | Siordia, Juan A. Bernaba, Michael Yoshino, Kenji Ulhaque, Abid Kumar, Sooraj Bernaba, Mario Bergin, Edward |
author_facet | Siordia, Juan A. Bernaba, Michael Yoshino, Kenji Ulhaque, Abid Kumar, Sooraj Bernaba, Mario Bergin, Edward |
author_sort | Siordia, Juan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The following systematic review and meta-analysis compile the current data regarding human controlled COVID-19 treatment trials. An electronic search of the literature compiled studies pertaining to human controlled treatment trials with COVID-19. Medications assessed included lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, favipiravir, heparin, and dexamethasone. Statistical analyses were performed for common viral clearance endpoints whenever possible. Lopinavir/ritonavir showed no significant effect on viral clearance for COVID-19 cases (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.50–1.83]). Hydroxychloroquine also showed no significant effect on COVID-19 viral clearance rates (OR 2.16 [95% CI 0.80–5.84]). Arbidol showed no 7-day (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.76–3.50]) or 14-day viral (OR 5.37 [95% CI 0.35–83.30]) clearance difference compared to lopinavir/ritonavir. Review of literature showed no significant clinical improvement with lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol, hydroxychloroquine, or remdesivir. Tocilizumab showed mixed results regarding survival. Favipiravir showed quicker symptom improvement compared to lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol. Heparin and dexamethasone showed improvement with severe COVID-19 cases requiring supplemental oxygenation. Current medications do not show significant effect on COVID-19 viral clearance rates. Tocilizumab showed mixed results regarding survival. Favipiravir shows favorable results compared to other tested medications. Heparin and dexamethasone show benefit especially for severe COVID-19 cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7361001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73610012020-07-15 Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials Siordia, Juan A. Bernaba, Michael Yoshino, Kenji Ulhaque, Abid Kumar, Sooraj Bernaba, Mario Bergin, Edward SN Compr Clin Med Covid-19 The following systematic review and meta-analysis compile the current data regarding human controlled COVID-19 treatment trials. An electronic search of the literature compiled studies pertaining to human controlled treatment trials with COVID-19. Medications assessed included lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, favipiravir, heparin, and dexamethasone. Statistical analyses were performed for common viral clearance endpoints whenever possible. Lopinavir/ritonavir showed no significant effect on viral clearance for COVID-19 cases (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.50–1.83]). Hydroxychloroquine also showed no significant effect on COVID-19 viral clearance rates (OR 2.16 [95% CI 0.80–5.84]). Arbidol showed no 7-day (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.76–3.50]) or 14-day viral (OR 5.37 [95% CI 0.35–83.30]) clearance difference compared to lopinavir/ritonavir. Review of literature showed no significant clinical improvement with lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol, hydroxychloroquine, or remdesivir. Tocilizumab showed mixed results regarding survival. Favipiravir showed quicker symptom improvement compared to lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol. Heparin and dexamethasone showed improvement with severe COVID-19 cases requiring supplemental oxygenation. Current medications do not show significant effect on COVID-19 viral clearance rates. Tocilizumab showed mixed results regarding survival. Favipiravir shows favorable results compared to other tested medications. Heparin and dexamethasone show benefit especially for severe COVID-19 cases. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7361001/ /pubmed/32838169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00399-6 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Covid-19 Siordia, Juan A. Bernaba, Michael Yoshino, Kenji Ulhaque, Abid Kumar, Sooraj Bernaba, Mario Bergin, Edward Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title | Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title_full | Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title_fullStr | Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title_short | Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials |
title_sort | systematic and statistical review of coronavirus disease 19 treatment trials |
topic | Covid-19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00399-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siordiajuana systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT bernabamichael systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT yoshinokenji systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT ulhaqueabid systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT kumarsooraj systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT bernabamario systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials AT berginedward systematicandstatisticalreviewofcoronavirusdisease19treatmenttrials |