Cargando…

Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the agreement in measuring retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness between spectral-domain (SD; Cirrus HD, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) and swept-source (SS; Plex Elite 9000, Carl Zeiss Meditec) OCT using an OCT angiography (OCTA) scanning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Bingyao, Chua, Jacqueline, Harish, Thiyagrajan, Lau, Amanda, Gan, Alfred Tau Liang, Tan, Yar Li, Wong, Damon W K, Chong, Rachel Shujuan, Ang, Marcus, Husain, Rahat, Schmetterer, Leopold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314706
_version_ 1783559331176775680
author Tan, Bingyao
Chua, Jacqueline
Harish, Thiyagrajan
Lau, Amanda
Gan, Alfred Tau Liang
Tan, Yar Li
Wong, Damon W K
Chong, Rachel Shujuan
Ang, Marcus
Husain, Rahat
Schmetterer, Leopold
author_facet Tan, Bingyao
Chua, Jacqueline
Harish, Thiyagrajan
Lau, Amanda
Gan, Alfred Tau Liang
Tan, Yar Li
Wong, Damon W K
Chong, Rachel Shujuan
Ang, Marcus
Husain, Rahat
Schmetterer, Leopold
author_sort Tan, Bingyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the agreement in measuring retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness between spectral-domain (SD; Cirrus HD, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) and swept-source (SS; Plex Elite 9000, Carl Zeiss Meditec) OCT using an OCT angiography (OCTA) scanning protocol. METHODS: 57 participants (12 glaucomatous, 8 ocular hypertensive and 74 normal eyes) were scanned with two OCT instruments by a single experienced operator on the same day. Circumpapillary RNFL thicknesses were automatically segmented for SD-OCT and manually segmented for SS-OCTA scans. Agreement of global RNFL thickness, as well as average thickness in four quadrants was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: There was excellent agreement in the inferior and superior quadrants and the global (all ICC >0.90), followed by good agreement in the temporal (ICC=0.79) and nasal (ICC=0.73) quadrants. The ICC values were similar in the subgroups except within the ocular hypertension group, where the nasal quadrant was less agreeable (ICC=0.31). SS-OCTA-derived RNFL thickness was on average 3 µm thicker than SD-OCT, particularly in the nasal (69.7±11.5 µm vs 66.3±9.3 µm; p<0.001) and temporal (75.6±13.7 µm vs 67.9±12.3 µm; p<0.001) quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: RNFL measurements taken with SS-OCTA have good-to-excellent agreement with SD-OCT, which suggests that the RNFL thickness can be sufficiently extracted from wide-field OCTA scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7361033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73610332020-07-16 Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness Tan, Bingyao Chua, Jacqueline Harish, Thiyagrajan Lau, Amanda Gan, Alfred Tau Liang Tan, Yar Li Wong, Damon W K Chong, Rachel Shujuan Ang, Marcus Husain, Rahat Schmetterer, Leopold Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the agreement in measuring retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness between spectral-domain (SD; Cirrus HD, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) and swept-source (SS; Plex Elite 9000, Carl Zeiss Meditec) OCT using an OCT angiography (OCTA) scanning protocol. METHODS: 57 participants (12 glaucomatous, 8 ocular hypertensive and 74 normal eyes) were scanned with two OCT instruments by a single experienced operator on the same day. Circumpapillary RNFL thicknesses were automatically segmented for SD-OCT and manually segmented for SS-OCTA scans. Agreement of global RNFL thickness, as well as average thickness in four quadrants was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: There was excellent agreement in the inferior and superior quadrants and the global (all ICC >0.90), followed by good agreement in the temporal (ICC=0.79) and nasal (ICC=0.73) quadrants. The ICC values were similar in the subgroups except within the ocular hypertension group, where the nasal quadrant was less agreeable (ICC=0.31). SS-OCTA-derived RNFL thickness was on average 3 µm thicker than SD-OCT, particularly in the nasal (69.7±11.5 µm vs 66.3±9.3 µm; p<0.001) and temporal (75.6±13.7 µm vs 67.9±12.3 µm; p<0.001) quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: RNFL measurements taken with SS-OCTA have good-to-excellent agreement with SD-OCT, which suggests that the RNFL thickness can be sufficiently extracted from wide-field OCTA scans. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7361033/ /pubmed/31585965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314706 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Tan, Bingyao
Chua, Jacqueline
Harish, Thiyagrajan
Lau, Amanda
Gan, Alfred Tau Liang
Tan, Yar Li
Wong, Damon W K
Chong, Rachel Shujuan
Ang, Marcus
Husain, Rahat
Schmetterer, Leopold
Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title_full Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title_fullStr Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title_short Comparison of a commercial spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
title_sort comparison of a commercial spectral-domain oct and swept-source oct based on an angiography scan for measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314706
work_keys_str_mv AT tanbingyao comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT chuajacqueline comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT harishthiyagrajan comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT lauamanda comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT ganalfredtauliang comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT tanyarli comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT wongdamonwk comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT chongrachelshujuan comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT angmarcus comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT husainrahat comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness
AT schmettererleopold comparisonofacommercialspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctbasedonanangiographyscanformeasuringcircumpapillaryretinalnervefibrelayerthickness