Cargando…

Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE: To compare gross tumour volume (GTV) in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software and to evaluate which method is more reliable for tumour volume definition in comparison with 3D ProSoma software. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 32 patients with his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuppner, Sigmund, Waskiewicz, Justyna, Ruiu, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.96156
_version_ 1783559367256178688
author Stuppner, Sigmund
Waskiewicz, Justyna
Ruiu, Antonio
author_facet Stuppner, Sigmund
Waskiewicz, Justyna
Ruiu, Antonio
author_sort Stuppner, Sigmund
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare gross tumour volume (GTV) in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software and to evaluate which method is more reliable for tumour volume definition in comparison with 3D ProSoma software. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 32 patients with histopathologically confirmed oropharynx carcinomas on dual-source computed tomography (CT) (all patients underwent multislice CT examination after applying 75 ml iodinated non-ionic contrast media). One radiologist calculated the tumour volume – manually measuring tumour length (L), width (W), and height (H) – and then calculated the tumour volume using the formula 0.5236 × L × W × H. The other radiologist used the syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software to calculate the tumour volumes. Both volume measuring methods were compared with the 3D ProSoma software, which is used by radiotherapists to calculate tumour volumes. Graphpad Prism software was used for statistical data. RESULTS: syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software for gross tumour volume determination has greater reliability than the standard manual method with Syngo Plaza in comparison with the 3D ProSoma software. CONCLUSIONS: syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software is a reliable tool for GTV calculation, with a high correlation score, like that of radiotherapeutic 3D ProSoma software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7361371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73613712020-07-17 Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis Stuppner, Sigmund Waskiewicz, Justyna Ruiu, Antonio Pol J Radiol Original Paper PURPOSE: To compare gross tumour volume (GTV) in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software and to evaluate which method is more reliable for tumour volume definition in comparison with 3D ProSoma software. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 32 patients with histopathologically confirmed oropharynx carcinomas on dual-source computed tomography (CT) (all patients underwent multislice CT examination after applying 75 ml iodinated non-ionic contrast media). One radiologist calculated the tumour volume – manually measuring tumour length (L), width (W), and height (H) – and then calculated the tumour volume using the formula 0.5236 × L × W × H. The other radiologist used the syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software to calculate the tumour volumes. Both volume measuring methods were compared with the 3D ProSoma software, which is used by radiotherapists to calculate tumour volumes. Graphpad Prism software was used for statistical data. RESULTS: syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software for gross tumour volume determination has greater reliability than the standard manual method with Syngo Plaza in comparison with the 3D ProSoma software. CONCLUSIONS: syngo.CT-Liver-Analysis software is a reliable tool for GTV calculation, with a high correlation score, like that of radiotherapeutic 3D ProSoma software. Termedia Publishing House 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7361371/ /pubmed/32685063 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.96156 Text en Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Stuppner, Sigmund
Waskiewicz, Justyna
Ruiu, Antonio
Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title_full Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title_short Gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. A retrospective analysis
title_sort gross tumour volume comparison in oropharynx carcinomas using different intelligent imaging software. a retrospective analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.96156
work_keys_str_mv AT stuppnersigmund grosstumourvolumecomparisoninoropharynxcarcinomasusingdifferentintelligentimagingsoftwarearetrospectiveanalysis
AT waskiewiczjustyna grosstumourvolumecomparisoninoropharynxcarcinomasusingdifferentintelligentimagingsoftwarearetrospectiveanalysis
AT ruiuantonio grosstumourvolumecomparisoninoropharynxcarcinomasusingdifferentintelligentimagingsoftwarearetrospectiveanalysis