Cargando…
Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition
Previous research has demonstrated several own-group biases (OGBs) in face recognition, but why they occur is unclear. Social–cognitive accounts suggest they stem from differential attention and facial processing, following the categorisation of a face as belonging to an “in” or “out” group. Three s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32279601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006620918100 |
_version_ | 1783559387756888064 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, V. Hole, G. Habibi, Ruth |
author_facet | Harrison, V. Hole, G. Habibi, Ruth |
author_sort | Harrison, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has demonstrated several own-group biases (OGBs) in face recognition, but why they occur is unclear. Social–cognitive accounts suggest they stem from differential attention and facial processing, following the categorisation of a face as belonging to an “in” or “out” group. Three studies explored whether OGBs can be produced by mere categorisation at encoding and investigated the role of in-group membership saliency on face recognition. Participants saw 40 facial images fictionally grouped according to in-/out-group status. Studies 1 and 2 used university membership as the grouping variable and found no evidence of an OGB, and no relationship between OGB magnitude and salience of group membership. Study 3 used the same design as Study 2, but with a highly salient group characteristic: participants’ stance on the U.K. Referendum (i.e., whether they were “Leave” or “Remain” supporters). In this case, an asymmetrical OGB was found, with only Remain voters demonstrating an OGB. Furthermore, a relationship between OGB magnitude and attitude toward the Referendum result was found. Overall, our results suggest that social categorisation and membership saliency alone may not be enough to moderate in- and out-group face recognition. However, when sufficiently polarised groups are used as in-/out-group categories, OGBs may occur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7361661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73616612020-08-13 Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition Harrison, V. Hole, G. Habibi, Ruth Perception Articles Previous research has demonstrated several own-group biases (OGBs) in face recognition, but why they occur is unclear. Social–cognitive accounts suggest they stem from differential attention and facial processing, following the categorisation of a face as belonging to an “in” or “out” group. Three studies explored whether OGBs can be produced by mere categorisation at encoding and investigated the role of in-group membership saliency on face recognition. Participants saw 40 facial images fictionally grouped according to in-/out-group status. Studies 1 and 2 used university membership as the grouping variable and found no evidence of an OGB, and no relationship between OGB magnitude and salience of group membership. Study 3 used the same design as Study 2, but with a highly salient group characteristic: participants’ stance on the U.K. Referendum (i.e., whether they were “Leave” or “Remain” supporters). In this case, an asymmetrical OGB was found, with only Remain voters demonstrating an OGB. Furthermore, a relationship between OGB magnitude and attitude toward the Referendum result was found. Overall, our results suggest that social categorisation and membership saliency alone may not be enough to moderate in- and out-group face recognition. However, when sufficiently polarised groups are used as in-/out-group categories, OGBs may occur. SAGE Publications 2020-04-11 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7361661/ /pubmed/32279601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006620918100 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Harrison, V. Hole, G. Habibi, Ruth Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title | Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title_full | Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title_fullStr | Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title_short | Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition |
title_sort | are you in or are you out? the importance of group saliency in own-group biases in face recognition |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32279601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006620918100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonv areyouinorareyououttheimportanceofgroupsaliencyinowngroupbiasesinfacerecognition AT holeg areyouinorareyououttheimportanceofgroupsaliencyinowngroupbiasesinfacerecognition AT habibiruth areyouinorareyououttheimportanceofgroupsaliencyinowngroupbiasesinfacerecognition |