Cargando…

Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing

The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Perip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mala, Anna, Osmancik, Pavel, Herman, Dalibor, Curila, Karol, Stros, Petr, Vesela, Jana, Prochazkova, Radka, Petr, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094
_version_ 1783559389451386880
author Mala, Anna
Osmancik, Pavel
Herman, Dalibor
Curila, Karol
Stros, Petr
Vesela, Jana
Prochazkova, Radka
Petr, Robert
author_facet Mala, Anna
Osmancik, Pavel
Herman, Dalibor
Curila, Karol
Stros, Petr
Vesela, Jana
Prochazkova, Radka
Petr, Robert
author_sort Mala, Anna
collection PubMed
description The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7361669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73616692020-07-20 Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing Mala, Anna Osmancik, Pavel Herman, Dalibor Curila, Karol Stros, Petr Vesela, Jana Prochazkova, Radka Petr, Robert Eur Heart J Suppl Articles The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176. Oxford University Press 2020-07 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7361669/ /pubmed/32694949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Mala, Anna
Osmancik, Pavel
Herman, Dalibor
Curila, Karol
Stros, Petr
Vesela, Jana
Prochazkova, Radka
Petr, Robert
Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title_full Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title_fullStr Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title_full_unstemmed Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title_short Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
title_sort can qrs morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? an analysis of ecg of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094
work_keys_str_mv AT malaanna canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT osmancikpavel canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT hermandalibor canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT curilakarol canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT strospetr canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT veselajana canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT prochazkovaradka canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing
AT petrrobert canqrsmorphologybeusedtodifferentiatebetweentrueseptalvsapparentlyseptalleadplacementananalysisofecgofrealmidseptalapparentmidseptalandapicalpacing