Cargando…

Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration

Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toledano, Manuel, Asady, Samara, Toledano-Osorio, Manuel, García-Godoy, Franklin, Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles, Benítez-García, José A., Osorio, Raquel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290
_version_ 1783559439109849088
author Toledano, Manuel
Asady, Samara
Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
García-Godoy, Franklin
Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles
Benítez-García, José A.
Osorio, Raquel
author_facet Toledano, Manuel
Asady, Samara
Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
García-Godoy, Franklin
Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles
Benítez-García, José A.
Osorio, Raquel
author_sort Toledano, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membranes were tested: Derma Fina (porcine dermis), Evolution Standard (equine pericardium) and Duo-Teck (equine lyophilized collagen felt). 10 × 10 mm(2) pieces of membranes were submitted to three different degradation procedures: (1) hydrolytic degradation in phosphate buffer solution, (2) enzyme resistance, using a 0.25% porcine trypsin solution, and (3) bacterial (Clostridium histolyticum) collagenase resistance test. Weight measurements were performed with an analytic microbalance. Thickness was measured with a digital caliper. Membranes were analyzed at different time-points, up to 21 d of immersion. A stereomicroscope was used to obtain membranes’ images. ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls were used for mean comparisons (p < 0.05), except when analyzing differences between time-points within the same membrane and solution where pair-wise comparisons were applied (p < 0.001). Derma Fina attained the highest resistance to all degradation challenges. Duo-Teck was the most susceptible membrane to degradation, complete degradation occurred as soon as 8 h. The bacterial collagenase solution performed as the most aggressive test as all membranes presented 100% degradation before 21 d.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7362079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73620792020-07-21 Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration Toledano, Manuel Asady, Samara Toledano-Osorio, Manuel García-Godoy, Franklin Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles Benítez-García, José A. Osorio, Raquel Polymers (Basel) Article Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membranes were tested: Derma Fina (porcine dermis), Evolution Standard (equine pericardium) and Duo-Teck (equine lyophilized collagen felt). 10 × 10 mm(2) pieces of membranes were submitted to three different degradation procedures: (1) hydrolytic degradation in phosphate buffer solution, (2) enzyme resistance, using a 0.25% porcine trypsin solution, and (3) bacterial (Clostridium histolyticum) collagenase resistance test. Weight measurements were performed with an analytic microbalance. Thickness was measured with a digital caliper. Membranes were analyzed at different time-points, up to 21 d of immersion. A stereomicroscope was used to obtain membranes’ images. ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls were used for mean comparisons (p < 0.05), except when analyzing differences between time-points within the same membrane and solution where pair-wise comparisons were applied (p < 0.001). Derma Fina attained the highest resistance to all degradation challenges. Duo-Teck was the most susceptible membrane to degradation, complete degradation occurred as soon as 8 h. The bacterial collagenase solution performed as the most aggressive test as all membranes presented 100% degradation before 21 d. MDPI 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7362079/ /pubmed/32512861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Toledano, Manuel
Asady, Samara
Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
García-Godoy, Franklin
Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles
Benítez-García, José A.
Osorio, Raquel
Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title_full Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title_short Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
title_sort differential biodegradation kinetics of collagen membranes for bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290
work_keys_str_mv AT toledanomanuel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT asadysamara differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT toledanoosoriomanuel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT garciagodoyfranklin differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT serrerafigallomariaangeles differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT benitezgarciajosea differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration
AT osorioraquel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration