Cargando…
Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration
Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290 |
_version_ | 1783559439109849088 |
---|---|
author | Toledano, Manuel Asady, Samara Toledano-Osorio, Manuel García-Godoy, Franklin Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles Benítez-García, José A. Osorio, Raquel |
author_facet | Toledano, Manuel Asady, Samara Toledano-Osorio, Manuel García-Godoy, Franklin Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles Benítez-García, José A. Osorio, Raquel |
author_sort | Toledano, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membranes were tested: Derma Fina (porcine dermis), Evolution Standard (equine pericardium) and Duo-Teck (equine lyophilized collagen felt). 10 × 10 mm(2) pieces of membranes were submitted to three different degradation procedures: (1) hydrolytic degradation in phosphate buffer solution, (2) enzyme resistance, using a 0.25% porcine trypsin solution, and (3) bacterial (Clostridium histolyticum) collagenase resistance test. Weight measurements were performed with an analytic microbalance. Thickness was measured with a digital caliper. Membranes were analyzed at different time-points, up to 21 d of immersion. A stereomicroscope was used to obtain membranes’ images. ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls were used for mean comparisons (p < 0.05), except when analyzing differences between time-points within the same membrane and solution where pair-wise comparisons were applied (p < 0.001). Derma Fina attained the highest resistance to all degradation challenges. Duo-Teck was the most susceptible membrane to degradation, complete degradation occurred as soon as 8 h. The bacterial collagenase solution performed as the most aggressive test as all membranes presented 100% degradation before 21 d. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7362079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73620792020-07-21 Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration Toledano, Manuel Asady, Samara Toledano-Osorio, Manuel García-Godoy, Franklin Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles Benítez-García, José A. Osorio, Raquel Polymers (Basel) Article Native collagen-based membranes are used to guide bone regeneration; but due to their rapid biodegradation, this treatment is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodegradability of natural collagen membranes. Three non-cross-linked resorbable collagen barrier membranes were tested: Derma Fina (porcine dermis), Evolution Standard (equine pericardium) and Duo-Teck (equine lyophilized collagen felt). 10 × 10 mm(2) pieces of membranes were submitted to three different degradation procedures: (1) hydrolytic degradation in phosphate buffer solution, (2) enzyme resistance, using a 0.25% porcine trypsin solution, and (3) bacterial (Clostridium histolyticum) collagenase resistance test. Weight measurements were performed with an analytic microbalance. Thickness was measured with a digital caliper. Membranes were analyzed at different time-points, up to 21 d of immersion. A stereomicroscope was used to obtain membranes’ images. ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls were used for mean comparisons (p < 0.05), except when analyzing differences between time-points within the same membrane and solution where pair-wise comparisons were applied (p < 0.001). Derma Fina attained the highest resistance to all degradation challenges. Duo-Teck was the most susceptible membrane to degradation, complete degradation occurred as soon as 8 h. The bacterial collagenase solution performed as the most aggressive test as all membranes presented 100% degradation before 21 d. MDPI 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7362079/ /pubmed/32512861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Toledano, Manuel Asady, Samara Toledano-Osorio, Manuel García-Godoy, Franklin Serrera-Figallo, María-Angeles Benítez-García, José A. Osorio, Raquel Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title | Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title_full | Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title_fullStr | Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title_short | Differential Biodegradation Kinetics of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration |
title_sort | differential biodegradation kinetics of collagen membranes for bone regeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12061290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toledanomanuel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT asadysamara differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT toledanoosoriomanuel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT garciagodoyfranklin differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT serrerafigallomariaangeles differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT benitezgarciajosea differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration AT osorioraquel differentialbiodegradationkineticsofcollagenmembranesforboneregeneration |