Cargando…

Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study

BACKGROUND: Two types of screw trajectories are commonly used in lumbar surgery. Both traditional trajectory (TT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) were shown to provide equivalent pull-out strengths of a screw. CBT utilizing a laterally-directed trajectory engaging only cortical bone in the pedicl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Che-Wei, Wang, Lu-Lin, Xu, Yu-Kun, Chen, Chun-Ming, Wang, Jian-Cyuan, Tsai, Wei-Tsung, Lin, Shang-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03437-5
_version_ 1783559498943692800
author Liu, Che-Wei
Wang, Lu-Lin
Xu, Yu-Kun
Chen, Chun-Ming
Wang, Jian-Cyuan
Tsai, Wei-Tsung
Lin, Shang-Chih
author_facet Liu, Che-Wei
Wang, Lu-Lin
Xu, Yu-Kun
Chen, Chun-Ming
Wang, Jian-Cyuan
Tsai, Wei-Tsung
Lin, Shang-Chih
author_sort Liu, Che-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two types of screw trajectories are commonly used in lumbar surgery. Both traditional trajectory (TT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) were shown to provide equivalent pull-out strengths of a screw. CBT utilizing a laterally-directed trajectory engaging only cortical bone in the pedicle is widely used in minimal invasive spine posterior fusion surgery. It has been demonstrated that CBT exerts a lower likelihood of violating the facet joint, and superior pull-out strength than the TT screws, especially in osteoporotic vertebral body. No design yet to apply this trajectory to dynamic fixation. To evaluate kinetic and kinematic behavior in both static and dynamic CBT fixation a finite element study was designed. This study aimed to simulate the biomechanics of CBT-based dynamic system for an evaluation of CBT dynamization. METHODS: A validated nonlinearly lumbosacral finite-element model was used to simulate four variations of screw fixation. Responses of both implant (screw stress) and tissues (disc motion, disc stress, and facet force) at the upper adjacent (L3-L4) and fixed (L4-L5) segments were used as the evaluation indices. Flexion, extension, bending, and rotation of both TT and CBT screws were simulated in this study for comparison. RESULTS: The results showed that the TT static was the most effective stabilizer to the L4-L5 segment, followed by CBT static, TT dynamic, and the CBT dynamic, which was the least effective. Dynamization of the TT and CBT fixators decreased stability of the fixed segment and alleviate adjacent segment stress compensation. The 3.5-mm diameter CBT screw deteriorated stress distribution and rendered it vulnerable to bone-screw loosening and fatigue cracking. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling the effects of TT and CBT fixation in a full lumbosacral model suggest that dynamic TT provide slightly superior stability compared with dynamic CBT especially in bending and rotation. In dynamic CBT design, large diameter screws might avoid issues with loosening and cracking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7362474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73624742020-07-17 Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study Liu, Che-Wei Wang, Lu-Lin Xu, Yu-Kun Chen, Chun-Ming Wang, Jian-Cyuan Tsai, Wei-Tsung Lin, Shang-Chih BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Two types of screw trajectories are commonly used in lumbar surgery. Both traditional trajectory (TT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) were shown to provide equivalent pull-out strengths of a screw. CBT utilizing a laterally-directed trajectory engaging only cortical bone in the pedicle is widely used in minimal invasive spine posterior fusion surgery. It has been demonstrated that CBT exerts a lower likelihood of violating the facet joint, and superior pull-out strength than the TT screws, especially in osteoporotic vertebral body. No design yet to apply this trajectory to dynamic fixation. To evaluate kinetic and kinematic behavior in both static and dynamic CBT fixation a finite element study was designed. This study aimed to simulate the biomechanics of CBT-based dynamic system for an evaluation of CBT dynamization. METHODS: A validated nonlinearly lumbosacral finite-element model was used to simulate four variations of screw fixation. Responses of both implant (screw stress) and tissues (disc motion, disc stress, and facet force) at the upper adjacent (L3-L4) and fixed (L4-L5) segments were used as the evaluation indices. Flexion, extension, bending, and rotation of both TT and CBT screws were simulated in this study for comparison. RESULTS: The results showed that the TT static was the most effective stabilizer to the L4-L5 segment, followed by CBT static, TT dynamic, and the CBT dynamic, which was the least effective. Dynamization of the TT and CBT fixators decreased stability of the fixed segment and alleviate adjacent segment stress compensation. The 3.5-mm diameter CBT screw deteriorated stress distribution and rendered it vulnerable to bone-screw loosening and fatigue cracking. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling the effects of TT and CBT fixation in a full lumbosacral model suggest that dynamic TT provide slightly superior stability compared with dynamic CBT especially in bending and rotation. In dynamic CBT design, large diameter screws might avoid issues with loosening and cracking. BioMed Central 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7362474/ /pubmed/32664920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03437-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Che-Wei
Wang, Lu-Lin
Xu, Yu-Kun
Chen, Chun-Ming
Wang, Jian-Cyuan
Tsai, Wei-Tsung
Lin, Shang-Chih
Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title_full Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title_fullStr Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title_full_unstemmed Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title_short Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
title_sort traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03437-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchewei traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT wanglulin traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT xuyukun traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT chenchunming traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT wangjiancyuan traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT tsaiweitsung traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy
AT linshangchih traditionalandcorticaltrajectoryscrewsofstaticanddynamiclumbarfixationafiniteelementstudy