Cargando…

A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan

AIM: Current guidelines recommend a door‐to‐balloon time (DTBT) of <90 min for reperfusion treatment of patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service (GEMS) using a rapid response car (RRC) system was implemented at our hosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshioka, Yuki, Teshima, Ryota, Gamo, Mina, Yoneda, Ryuhei, Matsunaga, Naoki, Takada, Tadaaki, Fukuta, Yasushi, Kishi, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.542
_version_ 1783559538181406720
author Yoshioka, Yuki
Teshima, Ryota
Gamo, Mina
Yoneda, Ryuhei
Matsunaga, Naoki
Takada, Tadaaki
Fukuta, Yasushi
Kishi, Koichi
author_facet Yoshioka, Yuki
Teshima, Ryota
Gamo, Mina
Yoneda, Ryuhei
Matsunaga, Naoki
Takada, Tadaaki
Fukuta, Yasushi
Kishi, Koichi
author_sort Yoshioka, Yuki
collection PubMed
description AIM: Current guidelines recommend a door‐to‐balloon time (DTBT) of <90 min for reperfusion treatment of patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service (GEMS) using a rapid response car (RRC) system was implemented at our hospital in April 2015. The medical team, including a physician and nurse, is dispatched to assess the patient and expedite the start of treatment by emergency physicians and cardiologists after arrival at the hospital. The study aimed to determine whether the RRC system shortened the DTBT. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary emergency center in Japan. Those STEMI patients with primary percutaneous intervention between January 2016 and December 2018 were evaluated. The DTBTs of patients transported by the RRC system, the emergency medical service (EMS), and transferred from other hospitals after STEMI diagnosis (TRANS group) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included, 33 in the RCC, 20 in the EMS, and 68 in the TRANS groups. The median DTBT was 51 min (interquartile range [IQR], 43–67) in the RRC, 61 min (IQR, 52–85) in the EMS, and 59 min (IQR, 48–72) in the TRANS groups (P = 0.13). The DTBT was not significantly shorter in the RRC than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: An RRC physician‐staffed GEMS did not significantly shorten the DTBT of patients with STEMI compared with other transport systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7362674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73626742020-07-17 A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan Yoshioka, Yuki Teshima, Ryota Gamo, Mina Yoneda, Ryuhei Matsunaga, Naoki Takada, Tadaaki Fukuta, Yasushi Kishi, Koichi Acute Med Surg Original Articles AIM: Current guidelines recommend a door‐to‐balloon time (DTBT) of <90 min for reperfusion treatment of patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service (GEMS) using a rapid response car (RRC) system was implemented at our hospital in April 2015. The medical team, including a physician and nurse, is dispatched to assess the patient and expedite the start of treatment by emergency physicians and cardiologists after arrival at the hospital. The study aimed to determine whether the RRC system shortened the DTBT. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary emergency center in Japan. Those STEMI patients with primary percutaneous intervention between January 2016 and December 2018 were evaluated. The DTBTs of patients transported by the RRC system, the emergency medical service (EMS), and transferred from other hospitals after STEMI diagnosis (TRANS group) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included, 33 in the RCC, 20 in the EMS, and 68 in the TRANS groups. The median DTBT was 51 min (interquartile range [IQR], 43–67) in the RRC, 61 min (IQR, 52–85) in the EMS, and 59 min (IQR, 48–72) in the TRANS groups (P = 0.13). The DTBT was not significantly shorter in the RRC than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: An RRC physician‐staffed GEMS did not significantly shorten the DTBT of patients with STEMI compared with other transport systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7362674/ /pubmed/32685177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.542 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yoshioka, Yuki
Teshima, Ryota
Gamo, Mina
Yoneda, Ryuhei
Matsunaga, Naoki
Takada, Tadaaki
Fukuta, Yasushi
Kishi, Koichi
A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title_full A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title_fullStr A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title_full_unstemmed A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title_short A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
title_sort physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with stemi: an observational study in a single emergency center in japan
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.542
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshiokayuki aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT teshimaryota aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT gamomina aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT yonedaryuhei aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT matsunaganaoki aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT takadatadaaki aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT fukutayasushi aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT kishikoichi aphysicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT yoshiokayuki physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT teshimaryota physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT gamomina physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT yonedaryuhei physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT matsunaganaoki physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT takadatadaaki physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT fukutayasushi physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan
AT kishikoichi physicianstaffedgroundemergencymedicalservicedoesnotsignificantlyshortendoortoballoontimeinpatientswithstemianobservationalstudyinasingleemergencycenterinjapan