Cargando…

Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging

BACKGROUND: Learning health care systems (LHSs) have the potential to transform health care. However, this transformation process faces significant challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on proposals and early examples of LHSs in the literature and conceptual analysis of the LHS mission, we provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wouters, Roel H.P., van der Graaf, Rieke, Voest, Emile E., Bredenoord, Annelien L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10211
_version_ 1783559539346374656
author Wouters, Roel H.P.
van der Graaf, Rieke
Voest, Emile E.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
author_facet Wouters, Roel H.P.
van der Graaf, Rieke
Voest, Emile E.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
author_sort Wouters, Roel H.P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning health care systems (LHSs) have the potential to transform health care. However, this transformation process faces significant challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on proposals and early examples of LHSs in the literature and conceptual analysis of the LHS mission, we provide four models with distinct organizational and ethical implications that may facilitate the transformation. RESULTS: An LHS could be developed in the following ways: by taking away practical impediments that prevent patients and professionals from engaging in scientific research (model 1: optimization LHS); by routinely analyzing observational data from electronic health records and other sources (model 2: comprehensive data LHS); by making clinical decisions based on the outcomes of the aforementioned data analyses and directly evaluating the outcomes in order to continuously improve decision‐making (model 3: real‐time LHS); or by embedding clinical trials into routine care delivery (model 4: full LHS). CONCLUSIONS: Each model has different ethical implications for consent and oversight. Also, the four‐model approach shows that reorganizing a health care center into an LHS is not an all‐or‐nothing decision. Rather, it is a choice from a menu of possibilities. Instead of discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the LHS menu in its entirety, the medical community should focus on the designs and ethical aspects of each of the separate options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7362679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73626792020-07-17 Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging Wouters, Roel H.P. van der Graaf, Rieke Voest, Emile E. Bredenoord, Annelien L. Learn Health Syst Policy Analysis BACKGROUND: Learning health care systems (LHSs) have the potential to transform health care. However, this transformation process faces significant challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on proposals and early examples of LHSs in the literature and conceptual analysis of the LHS mission, we provide four models with distinct organizational and ethical implications that may facilitate the transformation. RESULTS: An LHS could be developed in the following ways: by taking away practical impediments that prevent patients and professionals from engaging in scientific research (model 1: optimization LHS); by routinely analyzing observational data from electronic health records and other sources (model 2: comprehensive data LHS); by making clinical decisions based on the outcomes of the aforementioned data analyses and directly evaluating the outcomes in order to continuously improve decision‐making (model 3: real‐time LHS); or by embedding clinical trials into routine care delivery (model 4: full LHS). CONCLUSIONS: Each model has different ethical implications for consent and oversight. Also, the four‐model approach shows that reorganizing a health care center into an LHS is not an all‐or‐nothing decision. Rather, it is a choice from a menu of possibilities. Instead of discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the LHS menu in its entirety, the medical community should focus on the designs and ethical aspects of each of the separate options. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7362679/ /pubmed/32685681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10211 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Policy Analysis
Wouters, Roel H.P.
van der Graaf, Rieke
Voest, Emile E.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title_full Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title_fullStr Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title_full_unstemmed Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title_short Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging
title_sort learning health care systems: highly needed but challenging
topic Policy Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10211
work_keys_str_mv AT woutersroelhp learninghealthcaresystemshighlyneededbutchallenging
AT vandergraafrieke learninghealthcaresystemshighlyneededbutchallenging
AT voestemilee learninghealthcaresystemshighlyneededbutchallenging
AT bredenoordannelienl learninghealthcaresystemshighlyneededbutchallenging