Cargando…

On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing number of quality indicators being reported publicly with aim to improve the transparency on hospital care quality. However, they are little used by patients. Knowledge on patients’ preferences regarding quality may help to optimise the information presented to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salampessy, Benjamin H, Bijlsma, Ward R, van der Hijden, Eric, Koolman, Xander, Portrait, France R M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009818
_version_ 1783559554484666368
author Salampessy, Benjamin H
Bijlsma, Ward R
van der Hijden, Eric
Koolman, Xander
Portrait, France R M
author_facet Salampessy, Benjamin H
Bijlsma, Ward R
van der Hijden, Eric
Koolman, Xander
Portrait, France R M
author_sort Salampessy, Benjamin H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing number of quality indicators being reported publicly with aim to improve the transparency on hospital care quality. However, they are little used by patients. Knowledge on patients’ preferences regarding quality may help to optimise the information presented to them. OBJECTIVE: To measure the preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding publicly reported quality indicators of Dutch hospital care. METHODS: From the existing set of clinical quality indicators, participants of patient group discussions first assessed an indicator’s suitability as choice information and then identified the most relevant ones. We used the final selection as attributes in two discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Questionnaires included choice vignettes as well as a direct ranking exercise, and were distributed among patient communities. Data were analysed using mixed logit models. RESULTS: Based on the patient group discussions, 6 of 52 indicators (breast cancer) and 5 of 21 indicators (colon cancer) were selected as attributes. The questionnaire was completed by 84 (breast cancer) and 145 respondents (colon cancer). In the patient group discussions and in the DCEs, respondents valued outcome indicators as most important: those reflecting tumour residual (breast cancer) and failure to rescue (colon cancer). Probability analyses revealed a larger range in percentage change of choice probabilities for breast cancer (10.9%–69.9%) relative to colon cancer (7.9%–20.9%). Subgroup analyses showed few differences in preferences across ages and educational levels. DCE findings partly matched with those of direct ranking. CONCLUSION: Study findings show that patients focused on a subset of indicators when making their choice of hospital and that they valued outcome indicators the most. In addition, patients with breast cancer were more responsive to quality information than patients with colon cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7362772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73627722020-07-16 On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators Salampessy, Benjamin H Bijlsma, Ward R van der Hijden, Eric Koolman, Xander Portrait, France R M BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: There is an increasing number of quality indicators being reported publicly with aim to improve the transparency on hospital care quality. However, they are little used by patients. Knowledge on patients’ preferences regarding quality may help to optimise the information presented to them. OBJECTIVE: To measure the preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding publicly reported quality indicators of Dutch hospital care. METHODS: From the existing set of clinical quality indicators, participants of patient group discussions first assessed an indicator’s suitability as choice information and then identified the most relevant ones. We used the final selection as attributes in two discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Questionnaires included choice vignettes as well as a direct ranking exercise, and were distributed among patient communities. Data were analysed using mixed logit models. RESULTS: Based on the patient group discussions, 6 of 52 indicators (breast cancer) and 5 of 21 indicators (colon cancer) were selected as attributes. The questionnaire was completed by 84 (breast cancer) and 145 respondents (colon cancer). In the patient group discussions and in the DCEs, respondents valued outcome indicators as most important: those reflecting tumour residual (breast cancer) and failure to rescue (colon cancer). Probability analyses revealed a larger range in percentage change of choice probabilities for breast cancer (10.9%–69.9%) relative to colon cancer (7.9%–20.9%). Subgroup analyses showed few differences in preferences across ages and educational levels. DCE findings partly matched with those of direct ranking. CONCLUSION: Study findings show that patients focused on a subset of indicators when making their choice of hospital and that they valued outcome indicators the most. In addition, patients with breast cancer were more responsive to quality information than patients with colon cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7362772/ /pubmed/31831636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009818 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Salampessy, Benjamin H
Bijlsma, Ward R
van der Hijden, Eric
Koolman, Xander
Portrait, France R M
On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title_full On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title_fullStr On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title_full_unstemmed On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title_short On selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
title_sort on selecting quality indicators: preferences of patients with breast and colon cancers regarding hospital quality indicators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7362772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009818
work_keys_str_mv AT salampessybenjaminh onselectingqualityindicatorspreferencesofpatientswithbreastandcoloncancersregardinghospitalqualityindicators
AT bijlsmawardr onselectingqualityindicatorspreferencesofpatientswithbreastandcoloncancersregardinghospitalqualityindicators
AT vanderhijdeneric onselectingqualityindicatorspreferencesofpatientswithbreastandcoloncancersregardinghospitalqualityindicators
AT koolmanxander onselectingqualityindicatorspreferencesofpatientswithbreastandcoloncancersregardinghospitalqualityindicators
AT portraitfrancerm onselectingqualityindicatorspreferencesofpatientswithbreastandcoloncancersregardinghospitalqualityindicators