Cargando…

Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence

INTRODUCTION: A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benezery, Karen, Montagne, Lucile, Evesque, Ludovic, Schiappa, Renaud, Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel, Francois, Eric, Thamphya, Brice, Gerard, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.07.001
_version_ 1783559671486873600
author Benezery, Karen
Montagne, Lucile
Evesque, Ludovic
Schiappa, Renaud
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
Francois, Eric
Thamphya, Brice
Gerard, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Benezery, Karen
Montagne, Lucile
Evesque, Ludovic
Schiappa, Renaud
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
Francois, Eric
Thamphya, Brice
Gerard, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Benezery, Karen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical response during the first six months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective consecutive series included T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma staged using digital examination (DRE), endoscopy, magnetic radiation imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound. All patients were treated with organ preservation intent. Treatment protocol combined CXB (80–110 Gy/3–4 fractions) and EBRT ± concurrent capecitabine. In tumor exceeding 3.5 cm treatment was often initiated using EBRT. Clinical response was assessed (DRE, proctoscopy ± imaging) at very close interval between 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 61 patients (T2: 31; T3: 30) M0 (median age: 76 years) were treated. Treatment was initiated in 40 patients (T2: 28, T3: 12) with contact X-ray and in 21 (T2: 4, T3: 17) with EBRT. Using contact X-ray or EBRT first treatment, clinical complete (or near complete) response at week 14(±1) was respectively 88% [95CI:74–96] and 33% [95CI:15–57]. In multivariate analysis the treatment chronology was the most significant factor influencing cCR (OR: 7.53). At 6 months, with contact X-ray first all patients were in clinical complete response and five with EBRT remained in partial response. With 61 months median follow-up time, the local recurrence rate was 10% [95% CI: 6–16] at 5 years. T3 and fungating tumors were at higher risk of local recurrence. Organ preservation with good function was achieved in 95% of cases. CONCLUSION: This non randomized study tends to show that in early T2-3 tumors, a strategy using upfront contact therapy, which is reducing the overall treatment time, is an option allowing a more favorable outcome than EBRT first.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7363626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73636262020-07-20 Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence Benezery, Karen Montagne, Lucile Evesque, Ludovic Schiappa, Renaud Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel Francois, Eric Thamphya, Brice Gerard, Jean-Pierre Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article INTRODUCTION: A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical response during the first six months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective consecutive series included T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma staged using digital examination (DRE), endoscopy, magnetic radiation imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound. All patients were treated with organ preservation intent. Treatment protocol combined CXB (80–110 Gy/3–4 fractions) and EBRT ± concurrent capecitabine. In tumor exceeding 3.5 cm treatment was often initiated using EBRT. Clinical response was assessed (DRE, proctoscopy ± imaging) at very close interval between 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 61 patients (T2: 31; T3: 30) M0 (median age: 76 years) were treated. Treatment was initiated in 40 patients (T2: 28, T3: 12) with contact X-ray and in 21 (T2: 4, T3: 17) with EBRT. Using contact X-ray or EBRT first treatment, clinical complete (or near complete) response at week 14(±1) was respectively 88% [95CI:74–96] and 33% [95CI:15–57]. In multivariate analysis the treatment chronology was the most significant factor influencing cCR (OR: 7.53). At 6 months, with contact X-ray first all patients were in clinical complete response and five with EBRT remained in partial response. With 61 months median follow-up time, the local recurrence rate was 10% [95% CI: 6–16] at 5 years. T3 and fungating tumors were at higher risk of local recurrence. Organ preservation with good function was achieved in 95% of cases. CONCLUSION: This non randomized study tends to show that in early T2-3 tumors, a strategy using upfront contact therapy, which is reducing the overall treatment time, is an option allowing a more favorable outcome than EBRT first. Elsevier 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7363626/ /pubmed/32695890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.07.001 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Benezery, Karen
Montagne, Lucile
Evesque, Ludovic
Schiappa, Renaud
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
Francois, Eric
Thamphya, Brice
Gerard, Jean-Pierre
Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title_full Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title_fullStr Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title_full_unstemmed Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title_short Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence
title_sort clinical response assessment after contact x-ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer t2-t3 m0: the time/dose factor influence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT benezerykaren clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT montagnelucile clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT evesqueludovic clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT schiapparenaud clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT hannounlevijeanmichel clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT francoiseric clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT thamphyabrice clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence
AT gerardjeanpierre clinicalresponseassessmentaftercontactxraybrachytherapyandchemoradiotherapyfororganpreservationinrectalcancert2t3m0thetimedosefactorinfluence