Cargando…

Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior

PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topp, Janine, Heesen, Christoph, Augustin, Matthias, Andrees, Valerie, Blome, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4
_version_ 1783559691272454144
author Topp, Janine
Heesen, Christoph
Augustin, Matthias
Andrees, Valerie
Blome, Christine
author_facet Topp, Janine
Heesen, Christoph
Augustin, Matthias
Andrees, Valerie
Blome, Christine
author_sort Topp, Janine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignettes and explore their utility for measuring response shift in patients’ self-reports of HRQoL. METHODS: We conducted an explorative mixed-methods study. One hundred patients with multiple sclerosis or psoriasis participated in two interviews at intervals of 3–6 months. During both interviews, patients assessed HRQoL of 16 hypothetical individuals on the SF-12 questionnaire (two vignettes for each of the eight domains of the SF-12). In addition to these quantitative ratings, we used the think-aloud method to explore changes in patients’ verbalization of their decision processes during vignette ratings. RESULTS: Agreement of vignette ratings at baseline and follow-up was low (ICCs < 0.55). In addition, paired sample t-tests revealed no significant directional mean changes in vignette ratings. Thus, ratings changed non-directionally, neither confirming retest reliability nor a systematic change of assessment. Furthermore, patients’ verbalization of their decision processes did not indicate whether or not the assessment strategy of individual patients had changed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ ratings of anchoring vignettes fluctuate non-directionally over time. The think-aloud method appears not to be informative in exploring whether these fluctuations are due to changes in the individual decision process. Overall, vignettes might not be an appropriate approach to explore response shift, at least with regard to the specific target population and the use of the SF-12. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7363714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73637142020-07-20 Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior Topp, Janine Heesen, Christoph Augustin, Matthias Andrees, Valerie Blome, Christine Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignettes and explore their utility for measuring response shift in patients’ self-reports of HRQoL. METHODS: We conducted an explorative mixed-methods study. One hundred patients with multiple sclerosis or psoriasis participated in two interviews at intervals of 3–6 months. During both interviews, patients assessed HRQoL of 16 hypothetical individuals on the SF-12 questionnaire (two vignettes for each of the eight domains of the SF-12). In addition to these quantitative ratings, we used the think-aloud method to explore changes in patients’ verbalization of their decision processes during vignette ratings. RESULTS: Agreement of vignette ratings at baseline and follow-up was low (ICCs < 0.55). In addition, paired sample t-tests revealed no significant directional mean changes in vignette ratings. Thus, ratings changed non-directionally, neither confirming retest reliability nor a systematic change of assessment. Furthermore, patients’ verbalization of their decision processes did not indicate whether or not the assessment strategy of individual patients had changed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ ratings of anchoring vignettes fluctuate non-directionally over time. The think-aloud method appears not to be informative in exploring whether these fluctuations are due to changes in the individual decision process. Overall, vignettes might not be an appropriate approach to explore response shift, at least with regard to the specific target population and the use of the SF-12. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7363714/ /pubmed/32303892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Topp, Janine
Heesen, Christoph
Augustin, Matthias
Andrees, Valerie
Blome, Christine
Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title_full Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title_fullStr Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title_short Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
title_sort challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4
work_keys_str_mv AT toppjanine challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior
AT heesenchristoph challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior
AT augustinmatthias challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior
AT andreesvalerie challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior
AT blomechristine challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior