Cargando…
Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior
PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4 |
_version_ | 1783559691272454144 |
---|---|
author | Topp, Janine Heesen, Christoph Augustin, Matthias Andrees, Valerie Blome, Christine |
author_facet | Topp, Janine Heesen, Christoph Augustin, Matthias Andrees, Valerie Blome, Christine |
author_sort | Topp, Janine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignettes and explore their utility for measuring response shift in patients’ self-reports of HRQoL. METHODS: We conducted an explorative mixed-methods study. One hundred patients with multiple sclerosis or psoriasis participated in two interviews at intervals of 3–6 months. During both interviews, patients assessed HRQoL of 16 hypothetical individuals on the SF-12 questionnaire (two vignettes for each of the eight domains of the SF-12). In addition to these quantitative ratings, we used the think-aloud method to explore changes in patients’ verbalization of their decision processes during vignette ratings. RESULTS: Agreement of vignette ratings at baseline and follow-up was low (ICCs < 0.55). In addition, paired sample t-tests revealed no significant directional mean changes in vignette ratings. Thus, ratings changed non-directionally, neither confirming retest reliability nor a systematic change of assessment. Furthermore, patients’ verbalization of their decision processes did not indicate whether or not the assessment strategy of individual patients had changed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ ratings of anchoring vignettes fluctuate non-directionally over time. The think-aloud method appears not to be informative in exploring whether these fluctuations are due to changes in the individual decision process. Overall, vignettes might not be an appropriate approach to explore response shift, at least with regard to the specific target population and the use of the SF-12. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7363714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73637142020-07-20 Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior Topp, Janine Heesen, Christoph Augustin, Matthias Andrees, Valerie Blome, Christine Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Asking patients to rate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypothetical individuals described in anchoring vignettes has been proposed to enhance knowledge on how patients understand and respond to HRQoL questionnaires. In this article, we describe the development of anchoring vignettes and explore their utility for measuring response shift in patients’ self-reports of HRQoL. METHODS: We conducted an explorative mixed-methods study. One hundred patients with multiple sclerosis or psoriasis participated in two interviews at intervals of 3–6 months. During both interviews, patients assessed HRQoL of 16 hypothetical individuals on the SF-12 questionnaire (two vignettes for each of the eight domains of the SF-12). In addition to these quantitative ratings, we used the think-aloud method to explore changes in patients’ verbalization of their decision processes during vignette ratings. RESULTS: Agreement of vignette ratings at baseline and follow-up was low (ICCs < 0.55). In addition, paired sample t-tests revealed no significant directional mean changes in vignette ratings. Thus, ratings changed non-directionally, neither confirming retest reliability nor a systematic change of assessment. Furthermore, patients’ verbalization of their decision processes did not indicate whether or not the assessment strategy of individual patients had changed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ ratings of anchoring vignettes fluctuate non-directionally over time. The think-aloud method appears not to be informative in exploring whether these fluctuations are due to changes in the individual decision process. Overall, vignettes might not be an appropriate approach to explore response shift, at least with regard to the specific target population and the use of the SF-12. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7363714/ /pubmed/32303892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Topp, Janine Heesen, Christoph Augustin, Matthias Andrees, Valerie Blome, Christine Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title | Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title_full | Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title_fullStr | Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title_short | Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
title_sort | challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7363714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02488-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toppjanine challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior AT heesenchristoph challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior AT augustinmatthias challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior AT andreesvalerie challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior AT blomechristine challengesandlessonslearnedfromusinganchoringvignettestoexplorequalityofliferesponsebehavior |