Cargando…

A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles

This paper presents a comparative study on the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty thermal power system integrated by a supercritical CO(2) Brayton cycle, and a recuperative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) or a simple organic Rankine cycle (SORC). A thermodynamic model was de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas, Ochoa, Guillermo Valencia, Duarte-Forero, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04459
_version_ 1783559759556771840
author Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas
Ochoa, Guillermo Valencia
Duarte-Forero, Jorge
author_facet Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas
Ochoa, Guillermo Valencia
Duarte-Forero, Jorge
author_sort Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a comparative study on the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty thermal power system integrated by a supercritical CO(2) Brayton cycle, and a recuperative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) or a simple organic Rankine cycle (SORC). A thermodynamic model was developed applying the mass, energy and exergy balances to all the equipment, allowing to calculate the exergy destruction in the components. In addition, a sensitivity analysis allowed studying the effect of the primary turbine inlet temperature (T(IT,) P(HIGH), r(P) and T(C)) on the net power generated, the thermal and exergy efficiency, and some thermo-economic indicators such as the payback period (PBP), the specific investment cost (SIC), and the levelized cost of energy (LCOE), when cyclohexane, acetone and toluene are used as working fluids in the bottoming organic Rankine cycle. The parametric study results show that cyclohexane is the organic fluid that presents the best thermo-economic performance, and the optimization with the PSO method conclude a 2308.91 USD/kWh in the SIC, 0.22 USD/kWh in the LCOE, and 9.89 year in the PBP for the RORC system. Therefore, to obtain technical and economic viability, and increase the industrial applications of these thermal systems, thermo-economic optimizations must be proposed to obtain lower values of the evaluated performance indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73640382020-07-20 A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas Ochoa, Guillermo Valencia Duarte-Forero, Jorge Heliyon Article This paper presents a comparative study on the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty thermal power system integrated by a supercritical CO(2) Brayton cycle, and a recuperative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) or a simple organic Rankine cycle (SORC). A thermodynamic model was developed applying the mass, energy and exergy balances to all the equipment, allowing to calculate the exergy destruction in the components. In addition, a sensitivity analysis allowed studying the effect of the primary turbine inlet temperature (T(IT,) P(HIGH), r(P) and T(C)) on the net power generated, the thermal and exergy efficiency, and some thermo-economic indicators such as the payback period (PBP), the specific investment cost (SIC), and the levelized cost of energy (LCOE), when cyclohexane, acetone and toluene are used as working fluids in the bottoming organic Rankine cycle. The parametric study results show that cyclohexane is the organic fluid that presents the best thermo-economic performance, and the optimization with the PSO method conclude a 2308.91 USD/kWh in the SIC, 0.22 USD/kWh in the LCOE, and 9.89 year in the PBP for the RORC system. Therefore, to obtain technical and economic viability, and increase the industrial applications of these thermal systems, thermo-economic optimizations must be proposed to obtain lower values of the evaluated performance indicators. Elsevier 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7364038/ /pubmed/32695919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04459 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gutierrez, Javier Cardenas
Ochoa, Guillermo Valencia
Duarte-Forero, Jorge
A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title_full A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title_fullStr A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title_short A comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined Brayton S-CO(2)-ORC configurations as bottoming cycles
title_sort comparative study of the energy, exergetic and thermo-economic performance of a novelty combined brayton s-co(2)-orc configurations as bottoming cycles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04459
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezjaviercardenas acomparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles
AT ochoaguillermovalencia acomparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles
AT duarteforerojorge acomparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles
AT gutierrezjaviercardenas comparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles
AT ochoaguillermovalencia comparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles
AT duarteforerojorge comparativestudyoftheenergyexergeticandthermoeconomicperformanceofanoveltycombinedbraytonsco2orcconfigurationsasbottomingcycles