Cargando…

Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 2018 and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2018 criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sunyoung, Kim, Seung-seob, Chang, Dong ryul, Kim, Hyerim, Kim, Myeong-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32492765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0004
_version_ 1783559817958260736
author Lee, Sunyoung
Kim, Seung-seob
Chang, Dong ryul
Kim, Hyerim
Kim, Myeong-Jin
author_facet Lee, Sunyoung
Kim, Seung-seob
Chang, Dong ryul
Kim, Hyerim
Kim, Myeong-Jin
author_sort Lee, Sunyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 2018 and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2018 criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 273 treatment-naïve patients (71 patients with extracellular contrast agent [ECA]-MRI and 202 patients with hepatobiliary agent [HBA]-MRI; 352 lesions including 263 HCCs) with high risk of HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between 2016 and 2017. Two readers evaluated all lesions according to the criteria of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018. The per-lesion diagnostic performances were compared using the generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: On ECA-MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 were not significantly different (LR-5 vs. definite HCC: 75.8% vs. 69.4%, P=0.095 and 95.8% vs. 95.8%, P>0.999; LR-5/4 vs. definite/probable HCC: 87.1% vs.83.9%, P=0.313 and 87.5% vs. 91.7%, P=0.307). On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 showed significantly higher sensitivity (79.1% vs. 68.2%, P<0.001) than LR-5 of LI-RADS 2018 without a significant difference in specificity (93.9% vs. 95.4%, P=0.314). Definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 had higher specificity (92.3% vs. 80.0%, P=0.003) than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018. The sensitivity was lower for definite/probable HCC than for LR-5/4 without statistical significance (85.6% vs. 88.1%, P=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: On ECA-MRI, LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 showed comparable diagnostic performances. On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 provided better sensitivity than LR-5 category of LI-RADS 2018 without compromising the specificity, while definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 revealed higher specificity than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018 for diagnosing HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73643532020-07-27 Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging Lee, Sunyoung Kim, Seung-seob Chang, Dong ryul Kim, Hyerim Kim, Myeong-Jin Clin Mol Hepatol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 2018 and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2018 criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 273 treatment-naïve patients (71 patients with extracellular contrast agent [ECA]-MRI and 202 patients with hepatobiliary agent [HBA]-MRI; 352 lesions including 263 HCCs) with high risk of HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between 2016 and 2017. Two readers evaluated all lesions according to the criteria of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018. The per-lesion diagnostic performances were compared using the generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: On ECA-MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 were not significantly different (LR-5 vs. definite HCC: 75.8% vs. 69.4%, P=0.095 and 95.8% vs. 95.8%, P>0.999; LR-5/4 vs. definite/probable HCC: 87.1% vs.83.9%, P=0.313 and 87.5% vs. 91.7%, P=0.307). On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 showed significantly higher sensitivity (79.1% vs. 68.2%, P<0.001) than LR-5 of LI-RADS 2018 without a significant difference in specificity (93.9% vs. 95.4%, P=0.314). Definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 had higher specificity (92.3% vs. 80.0%, P=0.003) than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018. The sensitivity was lower for definite/probable HCC than for LR-5/4 without statistical significance (85.6% vs. 88.1%, P=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: On ECA-MRI, LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 showed comparable diagnostic performances. On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 provided better sensitivity than LR-5 category of LI-RADS 2018 without compromising the specificity, while definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 revealed higher specificity than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018 for diagnosing HCC. The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2020-07 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7364353/ /pubmed/32492765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0004 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Sunyoung
Kim, Seung-seob
Chang, Dong ryul
Kim, Hyerim
Kim, Myeong-Jin
Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort comparison of li-rads 2018 and klca-ncc 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32492765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0004
work_keys_str_mv AT leesunyoung comparisonoflirads2018andklcancc2018fornoninvasivediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimseungseob comparisonoflirads2018andklcancc2018fornoninvasivediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT changdongryul comparisonoflirads2018andklcancc2018fornoninvasivediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimhyerim comparisonoflirads2018andklcancc2018fornoninvasivediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimmyeongjin comparisonoflirads2018andklcancc2018fornoninvasivediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceimaging