Cargando…
Is tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy still the optimal treatment for chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response?
Autor principal: | Jang, Byoung Kuk |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0099 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Entecavir+tenofovir vs. lamivudine/telbivudine+adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response
por: Woo, Hyun Young, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Entecavir plus tenofovir versus entecavir plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with a suboptimal response to lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy
por: Park, Jung Gil, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparable efficacy with entecavir monotherapy and tenofovir–entecavir combination in chronic hepatitis B patients
por: Baqai, Sumbella, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
por: Kim, Jeong Han, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Sequential therapy from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus continuous entecavir monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B
por: Itokawa, Norio, et al.
Publicado: (2020)