Cargando…

Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament and the cuneiform 1-metatarsal 2&3 plantar ligament (CMPL). METHODS: Forty legs from 20 cadavers were examined. Classification proceeded according to the number of fiber bundles in the Lisfranc lig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Y., Edama, M., Kaneko, F., Ikezu, M., Matsuzawa, K., Hirabayashi, R., Kageyama, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00412-0
_version_ 1783559834071728128
author Suzuki, Y.
Edama, M.
Kaneko, F.
Ikezu, M.
Matsuzawa, K.
Hirabayashi, R.
Kageyama, I.
author_facet Suzuki, Y.
Edama, M.
Kaneko, F.
Ikezu, M.
Matsuzawa, K.
Hirabayashi, R.
Kageyama, I.
author_sort Suzuki, Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament and the cuneiform 1-metatarsal 2&3 plantar ligament (CMPL). METHODS: Forty legs from 20 cadavers were examined. Classification proceeded according to the number of fiber bundles in the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL. Morphological features measured were fiber bundle length, width, thickness, and angle. RESULTS: In Type I-a, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL were a single fiber bundle; in Type I-b, the Lisfranc ligament was a single fiber bundle, and the CMPL was two fiber bundles; in Type II-a, the Lisfranc ligament was a two fiber bundle, and the CMPL was a single fiber bundle; in Type II-b, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL were two fiber bundles; in Type III-a, the Lisfranc ligament was three fiber bundles, and the CMPL was a single fiber bundle; in Type III-b, the Lisfranc ligament was three fiber bundles, and the CMPL was two fiber bundles; in Type IV, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL could not be separated. Type I-a was seen in 37.5%, Type I-b in 10%, Type II-a in 30%, Type II-b in 7.5%, Type III-a in 7.5%, Type III-b in 2.5%, and Type IV in 5%. The Lisfranc ligament was significantly larger than the CMPL in total fiber bundle width, total fiber bundle thickness, and total fiber bundle angle. CONCLUSION: The Lisfranc ligament had up to 3 fiber bundles and the CMPL had one or two fiber bundles; classifications were four types and two subgroups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73644692020-07-20 Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament Suzuki, Y. Edama, M. Kaneko, F. Ikezu, M. Matsuzawa, K. Hirabayashi, R. Kageyama, I. J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament and the cuneiform 1-metatarsal 2&3 plantar ligament (CMPL). METHODS: Forty legs from 20 cadavers were examined. Classification proceeded according to the number of fiber bundles in the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL. Morphological features measured were fiber bundle length, width, thickness, and angle. RESULTS: In Type I-a, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL were a single fiber bundle; in Type I-b, the Lisfranc ligament was a single fiber bundle, and the CMPL was two fiber bundles; in Type II-a, the Lisfranc ligament was a two fiber bundle, and the CMPL was a single fiber bundle; in Type II-b, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL were two fiber bundles; in Type III-a, the Lisfranc ligament was three fiber bundles, and the CMPL was a single fiber bundle; in Type III-b, the Lisfranc ligament was three fiber bundles, and the CMPL was two fiber bundles; in Type IV, the Lisfranc ligament and the CMPL could not be separated. Type I-a was seen in 37.5%, Type I-b in 10%, Type II-a in 30%, Type II-b in 7.5%, Type III-a in 7.5%, Type III-b in 2.5%, and Type IV in 5%. The Lisfranc ligament was significantly larger than the CMPL in total fiber bundle width, total fiber bundle thickness, and total fiber bundle angle. CONCLUSION: The Lisfranc ligament had up to 3 fiber bundles and the CMPL had one or two fiber bundles; classifications were four types and two subgroups. BioMed Central 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7364469/ /pubmed/32677989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00412-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Suzuki, Y.
Edama, M.
Kaneko, F.
Ikezu, M.
Matsuzawa, K.
Hirabayashi, R.
Kageyama, I.
Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title_full Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title_fullStr Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title_full_unstemmed Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title_short Morphological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament
title_sort morphological characteristics of the lisfranc ligament
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00412-0
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukiy morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT edamam morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT kanekof morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT ikezum morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT matsuzawak morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT hirabayashir morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament
AT kageyamai morphologicalcharacteristicsofthelisfrancligament