Cargando…

Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images

BACKGROUND: Identification of bladder layers is a necessary prerequisite to bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We present a method of multi-class image segmentation, which recognizes urothelium, lamina propria, muscularis propria, and muscularis mucosa layers as well as regions of red blood cel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan, Yazgan, Enes, Tavolara, Thomas E., Li, Wencheng, Lee, Cheryl T., Parwani, Anil, Gurcan, Metin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01002-1
_version_ 1783559834548830208
author Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan
Yazgan, Enes
Tavolara, Thomas E.
Li, Wencheng
Lee, Cheryl T.
Parwani, Anil
Gurcan, Metin N.
author_facet Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan
Yazgan, Enes
Tavolara, Thomas E.
Li, Wencheng
Lee, Cheryl T.
Parwani, Anil
Gurcan, Metin N.
author_sort Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identification of bladder layers is a necessary prerequisite to bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We present a method of multi-class image segmentation, which recognizes urothelium, lamina propria, muscularis propria, and muscularis mucosa layers as well as regions of red blood cells, cauterized tissue, and inflamed tissue from images of hematoxylin and eosin stained slides of bladder biopsies. METHODS: Segmentation is carried out using a U-Net architecture. The number of layers was either, eight, ten, or twelve and combined with a weight initializers of He uniform, He normal, Glorot uniform, and Glorot normal. The most optimal of these parameters was found by through a seven-fold training, validation, and testing of a dataset of 39 whole slide images of T1 bladder biopsies. RESULTS: The most optimal model was a twelve layer U-net using He normal initializer. Initial visual evaluation by an experienced pathologist on an independent set of 15 slides segmented by our method yielded an average score of 8.93 ± 0.6 out of 10 for segmentation accuracy. It took only 23 min for the pathologist to review 15 slides (1.53 min/slide) with the computer annotations. To assess the generalizability of the proposed model, we acquired an additional independent set of 53 whole slide images and segmented them using our method. Visual examination by a different experienced pathologist yielded an average score of 8.87 ± 0.63 out of 10 for segmentation accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that predictions of our model can minimize the time needed by pathologists to annotate slides. Moreover, the method has the potential to identify the bladder layers accurately. Further development can assist the pathologist with the diagnosis of T1 bladder cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73644712020-07-20 Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan Yazgan, Enes Tavolara, Thomas E. Li, Wencheng Lee, Cheryl T. Parwani, Anil Gurcan, Metin N. Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: Identification of bladder layers is a necessary prerequisite to bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We present a method of multi-class image segmentation, which recognizes urothelium, lamina propria, muscularis propria, and muscularis mucosa layers as well as regions of red blood cells, cauterized tissue, and inflamed tissue from images of hematoxylin and eosin stained slides of bladder biopsies. METHODS: Segmentation is carried out using a U-Net architecture. The number of layers was either, eight, ten, or twelve and combined with a weight initializers of He uniform, He normal, Glorot uniform, and Glorot normal. The most optimal of these parameters was found by through a seven-fold training, validation, and testing of a dataset of 39 whole slide images of T1 bladder biopsies. RESULTS: The most optimal model was a twelve layer U-net using He normal initializer. Initial visual evaluation by an experienced pathologist on an independent set of 15 slides segmented by our method yielded an average score of 8.93 ± 0.6 out of 10 for segmentation accuracy. It took only 23 min for the pathologist to review 15 slides (1.53 min/slide) with the computer annotations. To assess the generalizability of the proposed model, we acquired an additional independent set of 53 whole slide images and segmented them using our method. Visual examination by a different experienced pathologist yielded an average score of 8.87 ± 0.63 out of 10 for segmentation accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that predictions of our model can minimize the time needed by pathologists to annotate slides. Moreover, the method has the potential to identify the bladder layers accurately. Further development can assist the pathologist with the diagnosis of T1 bladder cancer. BioMed Central 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7364471/ /pubmed/32677978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01002-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Niazi, Muhammad Khalid Khan
Yazgan, Enes
Tavolara, Thomas E.
Li, Wencheng
Lee, Cheryl T.
Parwani, Anil
Gurcan, Metin N.
Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title_full Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title_fullStr Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title_full_unstemmed Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title_short Semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from H&E Images
title_sort semantic segmentation to identify bladder layers from h&e images
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01002-1
work_keys_str_mv AT niazimuhammadkhalidkhan semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT yazganenes semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT tavolarathomase semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT liwencheng semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT leecherylt semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT parwanianil semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages
AT gurcanmetinn semanticsegmentationtoidentifybladderlayersfromheimages