Cargando…

Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection

[Image: see text] The CO(2) huff-n-puff experiments are often conducted on a rock sample with a given permeability. However, there is a need for understanding the production performance of CO(2) huff-n-puff over a range of rock permeability values. In this study, CO(2) huff-n-puff corefloods were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Xin, Yue, Xiang-an, Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01343
_version_ 1783559869723312128
author Su, Xin
Yue, Xiang-an
Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G.
author_facet Su, Xin
Yue, Xiang-an
Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G.
author_sort Su, Xin
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The CO(2) huff-n-puff experiments are often conducted on a rock sample with a given permeability. However, there is a need for understanding the production performance of CO(2) huff-n-puff over a range of rock permeability values. In this study, CO(2) huff-n-puff corefloods were conducted by using 30 cm long artificial cores over a permeability range between 0.7 and 240 mD. After that, the cores and produced oil were analyzed by NMT tests and gas chromatography tests. The effects of rock permeability on primary parameters, such as ultimate oil recovery, gas and oil ratio (GOR), pressures, residual oil distribution, and produced oil composition, were studied in detail. The experimental results indicate that the overall CO(2) huff-n-puff efficiency increases with permeability, while the production dynamics also changes with permeability. The oil production is greater and realized faster in high permeability core samples than low-permeability rocks; hence, maintaining the same production efficiency for low-permeability samples needs more production cycles and a longer production time. Fortunately, the GOR of CO(2) huff-n-puff in low-permeability samples is lower, which is favorable in long-term production. In contrast, a larger produced GOR is realized in high-permeability core samples, especially beyond the optimal cycle. Moreover, although the CO(2) front occurs at a shorter distance from the inlet as rock permeability decreases, CO(2) huff-n-puff can simultaneously produce oil from different pore sizes of different permeability core samples. The permeability of core samples also has a significant influence on the composition of the produced oil. The CO(2) extraction capability is stronger in samples with a lower permeability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73646312020-07-17 Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection Su, Xin Yue, Xiang-an Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G. ACS Omega [Image: see text] The CO(2) huff-n-puff experiments are often conducted on a rock sample with a given permeability. However, there is a need for understanding the production performance of CO(2) huff-n-puff over a range of rock permeability values. In this study, CO(2) huff-n-puff corefloods were conducted by using 30 cm long artificial cores over a permeability range between 0.7 and 240 mD. After that, the cores and produced oil were analyzed by NMT tests and gas chromatography tests. The effects of rock permeability on primary parameters, such as ultimate oil recovery, gas and oil ratio (GOR), pressures, residual oil distribution, and produced oil composition, were studied in detail. The experimental results indicate that the overall CO(2) huff-n-puff efficiency increases with permeability, while the production dynamics also changes with permeability. The oil production is greater and realized faster in high permeability core samples than low-permeability rocks; hence, maintaining the same production efficiency for low-permeability samples needs more production cycles and a longer production time. Fortunately, the GOR of CO(2) huff-n-puff in low-permeability samples is lower, which is favorable in long-term production. In contrast, a larger produced GOR is realized in high-permeability core samples, especially beyond the optimal cycle. Moreover, although the CO(2) front occurs at a shorter distance from the inlet as rock permeability decreases, CO(2) huff-n-puff can simultaneously produce oil from different pore sizes of different permeability core samples. The permeability of core samples also has a significant influence on the composition of the produced oil. The CO(2) extraction capability is stronger in samples with a lower permeability. American Chemical Society 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7364631/ /pubmed/32685823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01343 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Su, Xin
Yue, Xiang-an
Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G.
Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title_full Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title_fullStr Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title_full_unstemmed Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title_short Interplay between Rock Permeability and the Performance of Huff-n-Puff CO(2) Injection
title_sort interplay between rock permeability and the performance of huff-n-puff co(2) injection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01343
work_keys_str_mv AT suxin interplaybetweenrockpermeabilityandtheperformanceofhuffnpuffco2injection
AT yuexiangan interplaybetweenrockpermeabilityandtheperformanceofhuffnpuffco2injection
AT moghanloorouzbehg interplaybetweenrockpermeabilityandtheperformanceofhuffnpuffco2injection