Cargando…
A New Experimental Approach to Evaluate Coal Particles Floatability: Bubble–Particle Attachment and Detachment Kinetics
[Image: see text] Coal floatability evaluation is of vital importance in the prediction of flotation results and the design of a flotation flowsheet. In this work, a new experimental approach based on bubble–particle attachment kinetics (BPAK) and bubble–particle detachment kinetics (BPDK) were prop...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01630 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] Coal floatability evaluation is of vital importance in the prediction of flotation results and the design of a flotation flowsheet. In this work, a new experimental approach based on bubble–particle attachment kinetics (BPAK) and bubble–particle detachment kinetics (BPDK) were proposed to evaluate the floatability of coal particles. During attachment and detachment processes, a variation of coating angles θ(t) for different density coal particles were measured and fitted to a first-order model. Modified attachment rate constant k(a)(*) and modified detachment rate constant k(d)(*) were used as yardsticks of floatability. For comparison, flotation kinetics, induction time, and contact angle measurements were also conducted. A consistent sequence of floatability was obtained as: −1.4 > 1.4–1.6 > +1.6 g/cm(3). The modified flotation rate constant k* obtained in flotation kinetics was used as a yardstick to assess the accuracy of floatability evaluation methods. By individually fitting k* to parameters obtained in other tests, a simple and close linear relationship between k* and modified attachment rate constant k(a)(*) was established, rather than 1/k(d)(*) in BPDK tests, induction time t(ind), or (1 – cosα) in contact angle measurements. Consequently, k(a)(*) is thought to be a better criterion as k* could be quantitatively predicted by BPAK tests. Throughout this work, BPAK is an effective method to evaluate coal floatability. |
---|