Cargando…

CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值

OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of CD123 in bone marrow (BM) blasts of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients to explore the relationship between CD123 expression and therapeutic response and prognosis. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed expression and distribution of CD123 in BM blasts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29166741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.10.010
_version_ 1783559949725466624
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of CD123 in bone marrow (BM) blasts of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients to explore the relationship between CD123 expression and therapeutic response and prognosis. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed expression and distribution of CD123 in BM blasts in 137 cases of newly diagnosed AML (excluded M(3)), CD123 detected by flow cytometry≥20% was defined as positive, including 84 CD123(+) AML and 53 CD123(−) AML, efficacy and prognosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: ①Among 137 patients, 84 were in group CD123(+) (61.3%), and 53 in group CD123(−) (38.7%). All 137 patients were classified into risk groups based on cytogenetic and molecular biology abnormalities. No significant differences were seen between the three risk groups with regard to their CD123 levels (χ(2)=0.861, P=0.650). Compared with CD123(−) group, the CD123(+) group had higher WBC[47.7 (1.0–264.0) vs 22.4 (0.7–211.0), z=−2.592, P=0.010]. ②The rates of first complete remission (CR1) and recurrence of CD123(+) group were 54.8% (46/84) and 50.8% (32/63), respectively; and CD123(−) group were 73.6% (39/53) and 41.7% (20/48), respectively. There was significant difference of CR1 between the two groups (χ(2)=5.121, P=0.027), whereas no significant difference of the recurrence rate (χ(2)=0.911, P=0.340). ③The median dutations of OS between CD123(+) group and CD123(−) group were 20.0 (95%CI 13.1–26.9) months vs 44.0 (95%CI 23.6–47.3) months, respectively (χ(2)=5.874, P=0.015); The median durations of DFS were 7.8 (95%CI 1.4–14.1) months vs 18.6 (95%CI 0–39.7) months, respectively, no differences were observed between the two groups (χ(2)=2.939, P=0.086). ④CD123 retained an adverse prognosis value on DFS and OS within the intermediate group and patients ≤ 50 years older. CONCLUSION: CD123 widely expressed in AML patients, which was an independent risk factor for CR1 and OS, which implicating its important role in evaluating the induction chemotherapy response and prognosis of AML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7364966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73649662020-07-16 CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of CD123 in bone marrow (BM) blasts of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients to explore the relationship between CD123 expression and therapeutic response and prognosis. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed expression and distribution of CD123 in BM blasts in 137 cases of newly diagnosed AML (excluded M(3)), CD123 detected by flow cytometry≥20% was defined as positive, including 84 CD123(+) AML and 53 CD123(−) AML, efficacy and prognosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: ①Among 137 patients, 84 were in group CD123(+) (61.3%), and 53 in group CD123(−) (38.7%). All 137 patients were classified into risk groups based on cytogenetic and molecular biology abnormalities. No significant differences were seen between the three risk groups with regard to their CD123 levels (χ(2)=0.861, P=0.650). Compared with CD123(−) group, the CD123(+) group had higher WBC[47.7 (1.0–264.0) vs 22.4 (0.7–211.0), z=−2.592, P=0.010]. ②The rates of first complete remission (CR1) and recurrence of CD123(+) group were 54.8% (46/84) and 50.8% (32/63), respectively; and CD123(−) group were 73.6% (39/53) and 41.7% (20/48), respectively. There was significant difference of CR1 between the two groups (χ(2)=5.121, P=0.027), whereas no significant difference of the recurrence rate (χ(2)=0.911, P=0.340). ③The median dutations of OS between CD123(+) group and CD123(−) group were 20.0 (95%CI 13.1–26.9) months vs 44.0 (95%CI 23.6–47.3) months, respectively (χ(2)=5.874, P=0.015); The median durations of DFS were 7.8 (95%CI 1.4–14.1) months vs 18.6 (95%CI 0–39.7) months, respectively, no differences were observed between the two groups (χ(2)=2.939, P=0.086). ④CD123 retained an adverse prognosis value on DFS and OS within the intermediate group and patients ≤ 50 years older. CONCLUSION: CD123 widely expressed in AML patients, which was an independent risk factor for CR1 and OS, which implicating its important role in evaluating the induction chemotherapy response and prognosis of AML. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7364966/ /pubmed/29166741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.10.010 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title_full CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title_fullStr CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title_full_unstemmed CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title_short CD123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
title_sort cd123在急性髓系白血病患者骨髓异常细胞群中的表达及预后价值
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29166741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.10.010
work_keys_str_mv AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí
AT cd123zàijíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěgǔsuǐyìchángxìbāoqúnzhōngdebiǎodájíyùhòujiàzhí