Cargando…

Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review

Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honarmand, Kimia, Lalli, Rajkamal S., Priestap, Fran, Chen, Jennifer L., McIntyre, Christopher W., Owen, Adrian M., Slessarev, Marat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI
_version_ 1783560016961208320
author Honarmand, Kimia
Lalli, Rajkamal S.
Priestap, Fran
Chen, Jennifer L.
McIntyre, Christopher W.
Owen, Adrian M.
Slessarev, Marat
author_facet Honarmand, Kimia
Lalli, Rajkamal S.
Priestap, Fran
Chen, Jennifer L.
McIntyre, Christopher W.
Owen, Adrian M.
Slessarev, Marat
author_sort Honarmand, Kimia
collection PubMed
description Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51–57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29–41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38–100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15–63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10–78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10–20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78–86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44–52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7365360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73653602020-07-17 Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review Honarmand, Kimia Lalli, Rajkamal S. Priestap, Fran Chen, Jennifer L. McIntyre, Christopher W. Owen, Adrian M. Slessarev, Marat Am J Respir Crit Care Med Concise Clinical Review Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51–57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29–41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38–100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15–63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10–78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10–20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78–86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44–52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories. American Thoracic Society 2020-07-15 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7365360/ /pubmed/32078780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Concise Clinical Review
Honarmand, Kimia
Lalli, Rajkamal S.
Priestap, Fran
Chen, Jennifer L.
McIntyre, Christopher W.
Owen, Adrian M.
Slessarev, Marat
Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title_full Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title_short Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
title_sort natural history of cognitive impairment in critical illness survivors. a systematic review
topic Concise Clinical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI
work_keys_str_mv AT honarmandkimia naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT lallirajkamals naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT priestapfran naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT chenjenniferl naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT mcintyrechristopherw naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT owenadrianm naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview
AT slessarevmarat naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview