Cargando…
Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review
Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI |
_version_ | 1783560016961208320 |
---|---|
author | Honarmand, Kimia Lalli, Rajkamal S. Priestap, Fran Chen, Jennifer L. McIntyre, Christopher W. Owen, Adrian M. Slessarev, Marat |
author_facet | Honarmand, Kimia Lalli, Rajkamal S. Priestap, Fran Chen, Jennifer L. McIntyre, Christopher W. Owen, Adrian M. Slessarev, Marat |
author_sort | Honarmand, Kimia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51–57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29–41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38–100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15–63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10–78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10–20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78–86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44–52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7365360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Thoracic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73653602020-07-17 Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review Honarmand, Kimia Lalli, Rajkamal S. Priestap, Fran Chen, Jennifer L. McIntyre, Christopher W. Owen, Adrian M. Slessarev, Marat Am J Respir Crit Care Med Concise Clinical Review Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51–57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29–41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38–100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15–63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10–78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10–20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78–86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44–52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories. American Thoracic Society 2020-07-15 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7365360/ /pubmed/32078780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org). |
spellingShingle | Concise Clinical Review Honarmand, Kimia Lalli, Rajkamal S. Priestap, Fran Chen, Jennifer L. McIntyre, Christopher W. Owen, Adrian M. Slessarev, Marat Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title | Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title_full | Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title_short | Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review |
title_sort | natural history of cognitive impairment in critical illness survivors. a systematic review |
topic | Concise Clinical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honarmandkimia naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT lallirajkamals naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT priestapfran naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT chenjenniferl naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT mcintyrechristopherw naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT owenadrianm naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview AT slessarevmarat naturalhistoryofcognitiveimpairmentincriticalillnesssurvivorsasystematicreview |