Cargando…

Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings using principles outlined by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. METHODS: A steering group was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Alison, Webster, Louise, Bowen, Liza, Creighton, Fiona, Findlay, Sarah, Gale, Chris, Green, Marcus, Gronlund, Toto, Magee, Laura A, McManus, Richard J, Mistry, Hiten D, Singleton, Gemma, Thornton, Jim, Whybrow, Rebecca, Chappell, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347
_version_ 1783560030980669440
author Ho, Alison
Webster, Louise
Bowen, Liza
Creighton, Fiona
Findlay, Sarah
Gale, Chris
Green, Marcus
Gronlund, Toto
Magee, Laura A
McManus, Richard J
Mistry, Hiten D
Singleton, Gemma
Thornton, Jim
Whybrow, Rebecca
Chappell, Lucy
author_facet Ho, Alison
Webster, Louise
Bowen, Liza
Creighton, Fiona
Findlay, Sarah
Gale, Chris
Green, Marcus
Gronlund, Toto
Magee, Laura A
McManus, Richard J
Mistry, Hiten D
Singleton, Gemma
Thornton, Jim
Whybrow, Rebecca
Chappell, Lucy
author_sort Ho, Alison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings using principles outlined by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. METHODS: A steering group was established and ‘uncertainties’ were gathered using an online survey and literature search. An interim online survey ranked long-listed questions and the top 10 research questions were reached by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. PARTICIPANTS: Women, partners, relatives and friends of those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension, researchers and healthcare professionals. RESULTS: The initial online survey was answered by 278 participants (180 women with lived experience, 9 partners/relatives/friends, 71 healthcare professionals and 18 researchers). Together with a literature search, this identified 764 questions which were refined into 50 summary questions. All summary questions were presented in an interim prioritisation survey that was answered by 155 participants (87 women with lived experience, 4 partners/relatives/friends, 49 healthcare professionals and 15 researchers). The top 25 highest ranked questions were considered by the final prioritisation workshop. The top 10 uncertainties were identified by consensus and ranked as follows in order of priority: long-term consequences of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), short-term complications of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), screening tests for pre-eclampsia, prevention of long-term problems (for the woman and baby), causes of pregnancy hypertension, prevention of recurrent pregnancy hypertension, educational needs of healthcare professionals, diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, management of pregnancy hypertension, provision of support for women and families. CONCLUSIONS: Research priorities shared by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals have been identified. Researchers should use these to inform the choice of future studies in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7365422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73654222020-07-21 Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance Ho, Alison Webster, Louise Bowen, Liza Creighton, Fiona Findlay, Sarah Gale, Chris Green, Marcus Gronlund, Toto Magee, Laura A McManus, Richard J Mistry, Hiten D Singleton, Gemma Thornton, Jim Whybrow, Rebecca Chappell, Lucy BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings using principles outlined by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. METHODS: A steering group was established and ‘uncertainties’ were gathered using an online survey and literature search. An interim online survey ranked long-listed questions and the top 10 research questions were reached by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. PARTICIPANTS: Women, partners, relatives and friends of those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension, researchers and healthcare professionals. RESULTS: The initial online survey was answered by 278 participants (180 women with lived experience, 9 partners/relatives/friends, 71 healthcare professionals and 18 researchers). Together with a literature search, this identified 764 questions which were refined into 50 summary questions. All summary questions were presented in an interim prioritisation survey that was answered by 155 participants (87 women with lived experience, 4 partners/relatives/friends, 49 healthcare professionals and 15 researchers). The top 25 highest ranked questions were considered by the final prioritisation workshop. The top 10 uncertainties were identified by consensus and ranked as follows in order of priority: long-term consequences of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), short-term complications of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), screening tests for pre-eclampsia, prevention of long-term problems (for the woman and baby), causes of pregnancy hypertension, prevention of recurrent pregnancy hypertension, educational needs of healthcare professionals, diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, management of pregnancy hypertension, provision of support for women and families. CONCLUSIONS: Research priorities shared by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals have been identified. Researchers should use these to inform the choice of future studies in this area. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7365422/ /pubmed/32665388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ho, Alison
Webster, Louise
Bowen, Liza
Creighton, Fiona
Findlay, Sarah
Gale, Chris
Green, Marcus
Gronlund, Toto
Magee, Laura A
McManus, Richard J
Mistry, Hiten D
Singleton, Gemma
Thornton, Jim
Whybrow, Rebecca
Chappell, Lucy
Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title_full Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title_fullStr Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title_full_unstemmed Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title_short Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
title_sort research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a uk priority setting partnership with the james lind alliance
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347
work_keys_str_mv AT hoalison researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT websterlouise researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT bowenliza researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT creightonfiona researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT findlaysarah researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT galechris researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT greenmarcus researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT gronlundtoto researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT mageelauraa researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT mcmanusrichardj researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT mistryhitend researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT singletongemma researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT thorntonjim researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT whybrowrebecca researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance
AT chappelllucy researchprioritiesforpregnancyhypertensionaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance