Cargando…

Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to quantify breast skin strain and strain rate and the effect of support garments at reducing strain and to determine characteristics that correlate with strain during static and dynamic activity. METHODS: 39 women (UK size 32C to 36G) had electromagnetic sensors app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norris, Michelle, Mills, Chris, Sanchez, Amy, Wakefield-Scurr, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000770
_version_ 1783560032659439616
author Norris, Michelle
Mills, Chris
Sanchez, Amy
Wakefield-Scurr, Joanna
author_facet Norris, Michelle
Mills, Chris
Sanchez, Amy
Wakefield-Scurr, Joanna
author_sort Norris, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to quantify breast skin strain and strain rate and the effect of support garments at reducing strain and to determine characteristics that correlate with strain during static and dynamic activity. METHODS: 39 women (UK size 32C to 36G) had electromagnetic sensors applied to their breast skin. Sensor coordinates were recorded while standing, walking, running, in no, low and high breast support conditions, plus bare-breasted in the estimated neutral position to calculate strain. Relative breast coordinates and 35 inter-sensor distances identified peak breast skin strain (%) and strain rate (%·s(-1)), which were then correlated with nipple kinematics, breast pain and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Mean peak breast skin strain was generally <60% during standing, walking and running; however, some individuals exhibited 93% strain in bare-breasted running. Compared with low support, high support did not further reduce strain during standing and walking. Peak breast skin strain/strain rate location was longitudinal, in lateral and medial breast regions and displayed strong correlations with breast volume, body mass index and bust circumference. CONCLUSION: Static and dynamic activity did not result in excessive breast skin strain, suggesting low risk of skin damage. However, during running, some individuals experienced excessive skin strains (up to 93%) and strain rates (up to 1258%·s(-1)). Breast skin strain/strain rate location suggests lift is required in the lateral and medial bra cup to reduce strain, particularly in larger breast volumes due to increased skin strain risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7365429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73654292020-07-21 Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain? Norris, Michelle Mills, Chris Sanchez, Amy Wakefield-Scurr, Joanna BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Research BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to quantify breast skin strain and strain rate and the effect of support garments at reducing strain and to determine characteristics that correlate with strain during static and dynamic activity. METHODS: 39 women (UK size 32C to 36G) had electromagnetic sensors applied to their breast skin. Sensor coordinates were recorded while standing, walking, running, in no, low and high breast support conditions, plus bare-breasted in the estimated neutral position to calculate strain. Relative breast coordinates and 35 inter-sensor distances identified peak breast skin strain (%) and strain rate (%·s(-1)), which were then correlated with nipple kinematics, breast pain and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Mean peak breast skin strain was generally <60% during standing, walking and running; however, some individuals exhibited 93% strain in bare-breasted running. Compared with low support, high support did not further reduce strain during standing and walking. Peak breast skin strain/strain rate location was longitudinal, in lateral and medial breast regions and displayed strong correlations with breast volume, body mass index and bust circumference. CONCLUSION: Static and dynamic activity did not result in excessive breast skin strain, suggesting low risk of skin damage. However, during running, some individuals experienced excessive skin strains (up to 93%) and strain rates (up to 1258%·s(-1)). Breast skin strain/strain rate location suggests lift is required in the lateral and medial bra cup to reduce strain, particularly in larger breast volumes due to increased skin strain risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7365429/ /pubmed/32699646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000770 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Norris, Michelle
Mills, Chris
Sanchez, Amy
Wakefield-Scurr, Joanna
Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title_full Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title_fullStr Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title_full_unstemmed Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title_short Do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
title_sort do static and dynamic activities induce potentially damaging breast skin strain?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000770
work_keys_str_mv AT norrismichelle dostaticanddynamicactivitiesinducepotentiallydamagingbreastskinstrain
AT millschris dostaticanddynamicactivitiesinducepotentiallydamagingbreastskinstrain
AT sanchezamy dostaticanddynamicactivitiesinducepotentiallydamagingbreastskinstrain
AT wakefieldscurrjoanna dostaticanddynamicactivitiesinducepotentiallydamagingbreastskinstrain