Cargando…
System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a technical quality assessment
OBJECTIVE: to assess the technical quality of a decision support system for reception and risk classification in obstetrics. METHOD: a methodological study of assessment of the system. 12 nurses and 11 information technology (IT) professionals were invited to evaluate the Obstetrics Reception and Ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3327.3330 |
_version_ | 1783560069237964800 |
---|---|
author | Serafim, Rodolfo Cristiano Temer, Milena Jamas Parada, Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Peres, Heloisa Helena Ciqueto Serafim, Clarita Terra Rodrigues Jensen, Rodrigo |
author_facet | Serafim, Rodolfo Cristiano Temer, Milena Jamas Parada, Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Peres, Heloisa Helena Ciqueto Serafim, Clarita Terra Rodrigues Jensen, Rodrigo |
author_sort | Serafim, Rodolfo Cristiano |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to assess the technical quality of a decision support system for reception and risk classification in obstetrics. METHOD: a methodological study of assessment of the system. 12 nurses and 11 information technology (IT) professionals were invited to evaluate the Obstetrics Reception and Risk Classification System (Sistema de Acolhimento e Classificação de Risco em Obstetrícia, SACR-O). Based on the standards of the International Organization for Standardization, the minimum number of evaluators and the characteristics to be evaluated were established: functional suitability, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, compatibility, safety, maintainability, and portability. The characteristics assessed should be given a ≥70% positive assessment to be considered suitable. RESULTS: the characteristics assessed by the nurses and the IT professionals, respectively, were considered adequate: Functional suitability (97% and 98%), Reliability (91% and 94%), Usability (89% and 93%), Performance efficiency (97% and 98%), Compatibility (93% and 100%), and System security (95% and 97%). Maintainability (87%) and Portability (97%) were also evaluated by IT professionals. CONCLUSION: the technical quality of the SACR-O system was considered excellent by nurses and IT professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7365607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73656072020-07-28 System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a technical quality assessment Serafim, Rodolfo Cristiano Temer, Milena Jamas Parada, Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Peres, Heloisa Helena Ciqueto Serafim, Clarita Terra Rodrigues Jensen, Rodrigo Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to assess the technical quality of a decision support system for reception and risk classification in obstetrics. METHOD: a methodological study of assessment of the system. 12 nurses and 11 information technology (IT) professionals were invited to evaluate the Obstetrics Reception and Risk Classification System (Sistema de Acolhimento e Classificação de Risco em Obstetrícia, SACR-O). Based on the standards of the International Organization for Standardization, the minimum number of evaluators and the characteristics to be evaluated were established: functional suitability, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, compatibility, safety, maintainability, and portability. The characteristics assessed should be given a ≥70% positive assessment to be considered suitable. RESULTS: the characteristics assessed by the nurses and the IT professionals, respectively, were considered adequate: Functional suitability (97% and 98%), Reliability (91% and 94%), Usability (89% and 93%), Performance efficiency (97% and 98%), Compatibility (93% and 100%), and System security (95% and 97%). Maintainability (87%) and Portability (97%) were also evaluated by IT professionals. CONCLUSION: the technical quality of the SACR-O system was considered excellent by nurses and IT professionals. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7365607/ /pubmed/32696923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3327.3330 Text en Copyright © 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Serafim, Rodolfo Cristiano Temer, Milena Jamas Parada, Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Peres, Heloisa Helena Ciqueto Serafim, Clarita Terra Rodrigues Jensen, Rodrigo System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a technical quality assessment |
title | System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment
|
title_full | System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment
|
title_fullStr | System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment
|
title_full_unstemmed | System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment
|
title_short | System for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment
|
title_sort | system for reception and risk classification in obstetrics: a
technical quality assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3327.3330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serafimrodolfocristiano systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment AT temermilenajamas systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment AT paradacristinamariagarciadelima systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment AT peresheloisahelenaciqueto systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment AT serafimclaritaterrarodrigues systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment AT jensenrodrigo systemforreceptionandriskclassificationinobstetricsatechnicalqualityassessment |