Cargando…

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population

BACKGROUND: For patients investigated for suspected acute coronary syndrome, there is uncertainty if a single measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) at emergency department (ED) presentation can identify patients at both low and high risk for mortality. METHODS: We included con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavsak, Peter A., Cerasuolo, Joshua O., Ko, Dennis T., Ma, Jinhui, Sherbino, Jonathan, Mondoux, Shawn E., Perez, Richard, Seow, Hsien, Worster, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.004
_version_ 1783560100930125824
author Kavsak, Peter A.
Cerasuolo, Joshua O.
Ko, Dennis T.
Ma, Jinhui
Sherbino, Jonathan
Mondoux, Shawn E.
Perez, Richard
Seow, Hsien
Worster, Andrew
author_facet Kavsak, Peter A.
Cerasuolo, Joshua O.
Ko, Dennis T.
Ma, Jinhui
Sherbino, Jonathan
Mondoux, Shawn E.
Perez, Richard
Seow, Hsien
Worster, Andrew
author_sort Kavsak, Peter A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients investigated for suspected acute coronary syndrome, there is uncertainty if a single measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) at emergency department (ED) presentation can identify patients at both low and high risk for mortality. METHODS: We included consecutive adult patients in the ED who had a Clinical Chemistry Score (CCS) taken at presentation (ie, combination of glucose, creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate determination, and hs-cTnI assay) in a Canadian city between 2012 and 2013. Outcomes were 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality using the provincial death registry. Mortality rates and test performance (eg, sensitivity and specificity) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the CCS or hs-cTnI assay alone using established cutoffs for these tests. RESULTS: Our cohort included 5974 patients with a 1-year mortality rate of 17.2% (95% CI, 16.2-18.3). A CCS ≥ 1 yielded a sensitivity of 99.2% (95% CI, 98.4-99.6) compared with the hs-cTnI ≥ 5 ng/L cutoff sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 86.3-90.3), with the mortality rate being significantly lower for patients with CCS < 1 (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.9-4.0) vs patients with hs-cTnI < 5 ng/L (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.2-6.0) at 1 year (P = 0.01). A CCS of 5 also yielded a higher specificity (88.5%; 95% CI, 87.5-89.3) compared with hs-cTnI > 26 ng/L (83.9%; 95% CI, 82.9-84.9), with no difference in mortality rates (37.4% vs 36.3%; P = 0.66). This trend was consistent at 3-month and 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients in the ED with a potential cardiac issue, using the CCS cutoffs can better identify patients at low and high risk for mortality than using published cutoffs for hs-cTnI alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7365813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73658132020-07-20 High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population Kavsak, Peter A. Cerasuolo, Joshua O. Ko, Dennis T. Ma, Jinhui Sherbino, Jonathan Mondoux, Shawn E. Perez, Richard Seow, Hsien Worster, Andrew CJC Open Quality Improvement BACKGROUND: For patients investigated for suspected acute coronary syndrome, there is uncertainty if a single measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) at emergency department (ED) presentation can identify patients at both low and high risk for mortality. METHODS: We included consecutive adult patients in the ED who had a Clinical Chemistry Score (CCS) taken at presentation (ie, combination of glucose, creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate determination, and hs-cTnI assay) in a Canadian city between 2012 and 2013. Outcomes were 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality using the provincial death registry. Mortality rates and test performance (eg, sensitivity and specificity) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the CCS or hs-cTnI assay alone using established cutoffs for these tests. RESULTS: Our cohort included 5974 patients with a 1-year mortality rate of 17.2% (95% CI, 16.2-18.3). A CCS ≥ 1 yielded a sensitivity of 99.2% (95% CI, 98.4-99.6) compared with the hs-cTnI ≥ 5 ng/L cutoff sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 86.3-90.3), with the mortality rate being significantly lower for patients with CCS < 1 (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.9-4.0) vs patients with hs-cTnI < 5 ng/L (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.2-6.0) at 1 year (P = 0.01). A CCS of 5 also yielded a higher specificity (88.5%; 95% CI, 87.5-89.3) compared with hs-cTnI > 26 ng/L (83.9%; 95% CI, 82.9-84.9), with no difference in mortality rates (37.4% vs 36.3%; P = 0.66). This trend was consistent at 3-month and 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients in the ED with a potential cardiac issue, using the CCS cutoffs can better identify patients at low and high risk for mortality than using published cutoffs for hs-cTnI alone. Elsevier 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7365813/ /pubmed/32695979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.004 Text en © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Kavsak, Peter A.
Cerasuolo, Joshua O.
Ko, Dennis T.
Ma, Jinhui
Sherbino, Jonathan
Mondoux, Shawn E.
Perez, Richard
Seow, Hsien
Worster, Andrew
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title_full High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title_fullStr High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title_full_unstemmed High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title_short High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population
title_sort high-sensitivity cardiac troponin i vs a clinical chemistry score for predicting all-cause mortality in an emergency department population
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kavsakpetera highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT cerasuolojoshuao highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT kodennist highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT majinhui highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT sherbinojonathan highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT mondouxshawne highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT perezrichard highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT seowhsien highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation
AT worsterandrew highsensitivitycardiactroponinivsaclinicalchemistryscoreforpredictingallcausemortalityinanemergencydepartmentpopulation