Cargando…
Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: The 2-year efficacy and safety of combination therapy of ranibizumab administered together with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) compared with ranibizumab monotherapy in participants with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment outcomes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443 |
_version_ | 1783560195661627392 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Tock H. Lai, Timothy Y. Y. Takahashi, Kanji Wong, Tien Y. Chen, Lee-Jen Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan Tan, Colin S. Lee, Won Ki Cheung, Chui Ming Gemmy Ngah, Nor Fariza Patalauskaite, Ramune Margaron, Philippe Koh, Adrian |
author_facet | Lim, Tock H. Lai, Timothy Y. Y. Takahashi, Kanji Wong, Tien Y. Chen, Lee-Jen Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan Tan, Colin S. Lee, Won Ki Cheung, Chui Ming Gemmy Ngah, Nor Fariza Patalauskaite, Ramune Margaron, Philippe Koh, Adrian |
author_sort | Lim, Tock H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: The 2-year efficacy and safety of combination therapy of ranibizumab administered together with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) compared with ranibizumab monotherapy in participants with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment outcomes of ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus prompt vPDT combination therapy with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, monotherapy in participants with PCV for 24 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 24-month, phase IV, double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (EVEREST II) was conducted among Asian participants from August 7, 2013, to March 2, 2017, with symptomatic macular PCV confirmed using indocyanine green angiography. INTERVENTIONS: Participants (N = 322) were randomized 1:1 to ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus vPDT (combination therapy group; n = 168) or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus sham PDT (monotherapy group; n = 154). All participants received 3 consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections, followed by a pro re nata regimen. Participants also received vPDT (combination group) or sham PDT (monotherapy group) on day 1, followed by a pro re nata regimen based on the presence of active polypoidal lesions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Evaluation of combination therapy vs monotherapy at 24 months in key clinical outcomes, treatment exposure, and safety. Polypoidal lesion regression was defined as the absence of indocyanine green hyperfluorescence of polypoidal lesions. RESULTS: Among 322 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [8.8] years; 225 [69.9%] male), the adjusted mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains at month 24 were 9.6 letters in the combination therapy group and 5.5 letters in the monotherapy group (mean difference, 4.1 letters; 95% CI, 1.0–7.2 letters; P = .005), demonstrating that combination therapy was superior to monotherapy by the BCVA change from baseline to month 24. Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy in terms of complete polypoidal lesion regression at month 24 (81 of 143 [56.6%] vs 23 of 86 [26.7%] participants; P < .001). Participants in the combination group received fewer ranibizumab injections (median, 6.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 4.0-11.0]) than the monotherapy group (median, 12.0 [IQR, 7.0-17.0]) up to month 24. The combination group required a median of 2.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0) vPDT treatments for 24 months, with 75 of 168 participants (44.6%) requiring only 1 vPDT treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The 24-month data findings confirm that ranibizumab therapy, given as monotherapy or in combination with vPDT, is efficacious and safe for treatment of PCV. Combination therapy with vPDT added to ranibizumab achieved superior BCVA gain, increased odds of complete polypoidal lesion regression, and fewer treatment episodes compared with ranibizumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01846273. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7366282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73662822020-07-20 Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial Lim, Tock H. Lai, Timothy Y. Y. Takahashi, Kanji Wong, Tien Y. Chen, Lee-Jen Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan Tan, Colin S. Lee, Won Ki Cheung, Chui Ming Gemmy Ngah, Nor Fariza Patalauskaite, Ramune Margaron, Philippe Koh, Adrian JAMA Ophthalmol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The 2-year efficacy and safety of combination therapy of ranibizumab administered together with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) compared with ranibizumab monotherapy in participants with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment outcomes of ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus prompt vPDT combination therapy with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, monotherapy in participants with PCV for 24 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 24-month, phase IV, double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (EVEREST II) was conducted among Asian participants from August 7, 2013, to March 2, 2017, with symptomatic macular PCV confirmed using indocyanine green angiography. INTERVENTIONS: Participants (N = 322) were randomized 1:1 to ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus vPDT (combination therapy group; n = 168) or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, plus sham PDT (monotherapy group; n = 154). All participants received 3 consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections, followed by a pro re nata regimen. Participants also received vPDT (combination group) or sham PDT (monotherapy group) on day 1, followed by a pro re nata regimen based on the presence of active polypoidal lesions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Evaluation of combination therapy vs monotherapy at 24 months in key clinical outcomes, treatment exposure, and safety. Polypoidal lesion regression was defined as the absence of indocyanine green hyperfluorescence of polypoidal lesions. RESULTS: Among 322 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [8.8] years; 225 [69.9%] male), the adjusted mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains at month 24 were 9.6 letters in the combination therapy group and 5.5 letters in the monotherapy group (mean difference, 4.1 letters; 95% CI, 1.0–7.2 letters; P = .005), demonstrating that combination therapy was superior to monotherapy by the BCVA change from baseline to month 24. Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy in terms of complete polypoidal lesion regression at month 24 (81 of 143 [56.6%] vs 23 of 86 [26.7%] participants; P < .001). Participants in the combination group received fewer ranibizumab injections (median, 6.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 4.0-11.0]) than the monotherapy group (median, 12.0 [IQR, 7.0-17.0]) up to month 24. The combination group required a median of 2.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0) vPDT treatments for 24 months, with 75 of 168 participants (44.6%) requiring only 1 vPDT treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The 24-month data findings confirm that ranibizumab therapy, given as monotherapy or in combination with vPDT, is efficacious and safe for treatment of PCV. Combination therapy with vPDT added to ranibizumab achieved superior BCVA gain, increased odds of complete polypoidal lesion regression, and fewer treatment episodes compared with ranibizumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01846273. American Medical Association 2020-09 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366282/ /pubmed/32672800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443 Text en Copyright 2020 Lim TH et al. JAMA Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Lim, Tock H. Lai, Timothy Y. Y. Takahashi, Kanji Wong, Tien Y. Chen, Lee-Jen Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan Tan, Colin S. Lee, Won Ki Cheung, Chui Ming Gemmy Ngah, Nor Fariza Patalauskaite, Ramune Margaron, Philippe Koh, Adrian Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Ranibizumab With or Without Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: The EVEREST II Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | comparison of ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the everest ii randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limtockh comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT laitimothyyy comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT takahashikanji comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT wongtieny comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT chenleejen comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT ruamviboonsukpaisan comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT tancolins comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT leewonki comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT cheungchuiminggemmy comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT ngahnorfariza comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT patalauskaiteramune comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT margaronphilippe comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial AT kohadrian comparisonofranibizumabwithorwithoutverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforpolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathytheeverestiirandomizedclinicaltrial |