Cargando…

Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials

Outcomes in economic evaluations, such as health utilities and costs, are products of multiple variables, often requiring complete item responses to questionnaires. Therefore, missing data are very common in cost-effectiveness analyses. Multiple imputations (MI) are predominately recommended and cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalowsky, Bernhard, Hoffmann, Wolfgang, Kennedy, Kevin, Xie, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z
_version_ 1783560247048142848
author Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Kennedy, Kevin
Xie, Feng
author_facet Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Kennedy, Kevin
Xie, Feng
author_sort Michalowsky, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description Outcomes in economic evaluations, such as health utilities and costs, are products of multiple variables, often requiring complete item responses to questionnaires. Therefore, missing data are very common in cost-effectiveness analyses. Multiple imputations (MI) are predominately recommended and could be made either for individual items or at the aggregate level. We, therefore, aimed to assess the precision of both MI approaches (the item imputation vs. aggregate imputation) on the cost-effectiveness results. The original data set came from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial and was used to describe the missing data pattern and compare the differences in the cost-effectiveness results between the two imputation approaches. A simulation study with different missing data scenarios generated based on a complete data set was used to assess the precision of both imputation approaches. For health utility and cost, patients more often had a partial (9% vs. 23%, respectively) rather than complete missing (4% vs. 0%). The imputation approaches differed in the cost-effectiveness results (the item imputation: − 61,079€/QALY vs. the aggregate imputation: 15,399€/QALY). Within the simulation study mean relative bias (< 5% vs. < 10%) and range of bias (< 38% vs. < 83%) to the true incremental cost and incremental QALYs were lower for the item imputation compared to the aggregate imputation. Even when 40% of data were missing, relative bias to true cost-effectiveness curves was less than 16% using the item imputation, but up to 39% for the aggregate imputation. Thus, the imputation strategies could have a significant impact on the cost-effectiveness conclusions when more than 20% of data are missing. The item imputation approach has better precision than the imputation at the aggregate level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73665732020-07-21 Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Kennedy, Kevin Xie, Feng Eur J Health Econ Original Paper Outcomes in economic evaluations, such as health utilities and costs, are products of multiple variables, often requiring complete item responses to questionnaires. Therefore, missing data are very common in cost-effectiveness analyses. Multiple imputations (MI) are predominately recommended and could be made either for individual items or at the aggregate level. We, therefore, aimed to assess the precision of both MI approaches (the item imputation vs. aggregate imputation) on the cost-effectiveness results. The original data set came from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial and was used to describe the missing data pattern and compare the differences in the cost-effectiveness results between the two imputation approaches. A simulation study with different missing data scenarios generated based on a complete data set was used to assess the precision of both imputation approaches. For health utility and cost, patients more often had a partial (9% vs. 23%, respectively) rather than complete missing (4% vs. 0%). The imputation approaches differed in the cost-effectiveness results (the item imputation: − 61,079€/QALY vs. the aggregate imputation: 15,399€/QALY). Within the simulation study mean relative bias (< 5% vs. < 10%) and range of bias (< 38% vs. < 83%) to the true incremental cost and incremental QALYs were lower for the item imputation compared to the aggregate imputation. Even when 40% of data were missing, relative bias to true cost-effectiveness curves was less than 16% using the item imputation, but up to 39% for the aggregate imputation. Thus, the imputation strategies could have a significant impact on the cost-effectiveness conclusions when more than 20% of data are missing. The item imputation approach has better precision than the imputation at the aggregate level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7366573/ /pubmed/32108274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Kennedy, Kevin
Xie, Feng
Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title_full Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title_short Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
title_sort is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z
work_keys_str_mv AT michalowskybernhard isthewholelargerthanthesumofitspartsimpactofmissingdataimputationineconomicevaluationconductedalongsiderandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hoffmannwolfgang isthewholelargerthanthesumofitspartsimpactofmissingdataimputationineconomicevaluationconductedalongsiderandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kennedykevin isthewholelargerthanthesumofitspartsimpactofmissingdataimputationineconomicevaluationconductedalongsiderandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiefeng isthewholelargerthanthesumofitspartsimpactofmissingdataimputationineconomicevaluationconductedalongsiderandomizedcontrolledtrials