Cargando…

The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner

PURPOSE: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are a negative prognostic factor in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Forty percent of candidates for surgical decompression show RNRs (RNR+) on preoperative conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated the prevalence of RNRs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papavero, Luca, Ebert, Stella, Marques, Carlos J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02423-x
_version_ 1783560251480473600
author Papavero, Luca
Ebert, Stella
Marques, Carlos J.
author_facet Papavero, Luca
Ebert, Stella
Marques, Carlos J.
author_sort Papavero, Luca
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are a negative prognostic factor in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Forty percent of candidates for surgical decompression show RNRs (RNR+) on preoperative conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated the prevalence of RNRs in three functional postures (standing, neutral sitting and flexed sitting) with an upright MRI (upMRI). METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a repeated measures design. Thirty surgical candidates underwent upMRI. Sagittal and axial T2-weighted images of the three functional postures were evaluated. The segmental length of the lumbar spine (sLLS), the lordotic angle (LA) and the dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) were measured in each body position. Generalized linear mixed models were carried out. The 0.05 level of probability was set as the criterion for statistical significance. RESULTS: The prevalence of RNRs decreased from 80% during standing to 16.7% during flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The sLLS increased significantly from standing to neutral sitting in both RNR groups (p < 0.001). The increase from neutral sitting to flexed sitting was only significant (p < 0.001) for the group without RNRs (RNR−). The LA decreased significantly for both RNR groups from standing to flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The DSCA increased significantly in the RNR− group (p < 0.001) but not in the RNR+ group (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNRs is body position dependent. Increases in DCSA play a determinant role in resolving RNRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73665952020-07-21 The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner Papavero, Luca Ebert, Stella Marques, Carlos J. Neuroradiology Spinal Neuroradiology PURPOSE: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are a negative prognostic factor in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Forty percent of candidates for surgical decompression show RNRs (RNR+) on preoperative conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated the prevalence of RNRs in three functional postures (standing, neutral sitting and flexed sitting) with an upright MRI (upMRI). METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a repeated measures design. Thirty surgical candidates underwent upMRI. Sagittal and axial T2-weighted images of the three functional postures were evaluated. The segmental length of the lumbar spine (sLLS), the lordotic angle (LA) and the dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) were measured in each body position. Generalized linear mixed models were carried out. The 0.05 level of probability was set as the criterion for statistical significance. RESULTS: The prevalence of RNRs decreased from 80% during standing to 16.7% during flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The sLLS increased significantly from standing to neutral sitting in both RNR groups (p < 0.001). The increase from neutral sitting to flexed sitting was only significant (p < 0.001) for the group without RNRs (RNR−). The LA decreased significantly for both RNR groups from standing to flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The DSCA increased significantly in the RNR− group (p < 0.001) but not in the RNR+ group (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNRs is body position dependent. Increases in DCSA play a determinant role in resolving RNRs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7366595/ /pubmed/32318772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02423-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Spinal Neuroradiology
Papavero, Luca
Ebert, Stella
Marques, Carlos J.
The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title_full The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title_fullStr The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title_short The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner
title_sort prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright mri scanner
topic Spinal Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02423-x
work_keys_str_mv AT papaveroluca theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner
AT ebertstella theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner
AT marquescarlosj theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner
AT papaveroluca prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner
AT ebertstella prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner
AT marquescarlosj prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisisbodypositiondependentaretrospectiveobservationalstudywithrepeatedmeasuresdesigninanuprightmriscanner