Cargando…

Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements

The aim of this study is to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and bi-dimensional reconstructed lateral cephalograms (RLCs) in assessing mandibular body length and growth and to evaluate how mandibular reshaping influences the error in measuring mandibular body growth in bi-dimensional rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maspero, Cinzia, Farronato, Marco, Bellincioni, Francesca, Cavagnetto, Davide, Abate, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68562-6
_version_ 1783560256191725568
author Maspero, Cinzia
Farronato, Marco
Bellincioni, Francesca
Cavagnetto, Davide
Abate, Andrea
author_facet Maspero, Cinzia
Farronato, Marco
Bellincioni, Francesca
Cavagnetto, Davide
Abate, Andrea
author_sort Maspero, Cinzia
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and bi-dimensional reconstructed lateral cephalograms (RLCs) in assessing mandibular body length and growth and to evaluate how mandibular reshaping influences the error in measuring mandibular body growth in bi-dimensional radiographs. Twenty-five patients with two CBCT scans taken at a mean distance of 2.21 ± 0.5 years were selected. The following measurements were performed: right and left mandibular body length at each point in time, mandibular growth, inter-gonial distance and mandibular symphyseal angle. From each CBCT, an RLC was obtained, and mandibular body length and growth were measured. Data analysis revealed a statistically and clinically significant difference in CBCT and RLC regarding the mandibular length of each patient at each point in time. However, mandibular growth was almost identical. A linear regression was performed to predict growth distortion between RLCs and CBCT depending on the ratio between transverse and sagittal mandibular growth. The expected maximum and minimum distortion, however, appeared not to be significant. In fact, a second linear regression model and a Bland–Altman test revealed a strong correlation between measurements of average mandibular body growth by CBCT and RLCs. As the same distortion occurs in the first and second RLCs, bi-dimensional radiographs remain the method of choice in evaluating mandibular body growth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73666182020-07-17 Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements Maspero, Cinzia Farronato, Marco Bellincioni, Francesca Cavagnetto, Davide Abate, Andrea Sci Rep Article The aim of this study is to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and bi-dimensional reconstructed lateral cephalograms (RLCs) in assessing mandibular body length and growth and to evaluate how mandibular reshaping influences the error in measuring mandibular body growth in bi-dimensional radiographs. Twenty-five patients with two CBCT scans taken at a mean distance of 2.21 ± 0.5 years were selected. The following measurements were performed: right and left mandibular body length at each point in time, mandibular growth, inter-gonial distance and mandibular symphyseal angle. From each CBCT, an RLC was obtained, and mandibular body length and growth were measured. Data analysis revealed a statistically and clinically significant difference in CBCT and RLC regarding the mandibular length of each patient at each point in time. However, mandibular growth was almost identical. A linear regression was performed to predict growth distortion between RLCs and CBCT depending on the ratio between transverse and sagittal mandibular growth. The expected maximum and minimum distortion, however, appeared not to be significant. In fact, a second linear regression model and a Bland–Altman test revealed a strong correlation between measurements of average mandibular body growth by CBCT and RLCs. As the same distortion occurs in the first and second RLCs, bi-dimensional radiographs remain the method of choice in evaluating mandibular body growth. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366618/ /pubmed/32678176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68562-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Maspero, Cinzia
Farronato, Marco
Bellincioni, Francesca
Cavagnetto, Davide
Abate, Andrea
Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title_full Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title_fullStr Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title_full_unstemmed Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title_short Assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
title_sort assessing mandibular body changes in growing subjects: a comparison of cbct and reconstructed lateral cephalogram measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68562-6
work_keys_str_mv AT masperocinzia assessingmandibularbodychangesingrowingsubjectsacomparisonofcbctandreconstructedlateralcephalogrammeasurements
AT farronatomarco assessingmandibularbodychangesingrowingsubjectsacomparisonofcbctandreconstructedlateralcephalogrammeasurements
AT bellincionifrancesca assessingmandibularbodychangesingrowingsubjectsacomparisonofcbctandreconstructedlateralcephalogrammeasurements
AT cavagnettodavide assessingmandibularbodychangesingrowingsubjectsacomparisonofcbctandreconstructedlateralcephalogrammeasurements
AT abateandrea assessingmandibularbodychangesingrowingsubjectsacomparisonofcbctandreconstructedlateralcephalogrammeasurements