Cargando…

Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida

Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida are two of multiple agents responsible for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cattle. Following respiratory infection of calves with H. somni, P. multocida may also be isolated from the lower respiratory tract. Because H. somni may form a biofilm during B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petruzzi, Briana, Dickerman, Allan, Lahmers, Kevin, Scarratt, William K., Inzana, Thomas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01561
_version_ 1783560265816604672
author Petruzzi, Briana
Dickerman, Allan
Lahmers, Kevin
Scarratt, William K.
Inzana, Thomas J.
author_facet Petruzzi, Briana
Dickerman, Allan
Lahmers, Kevin
Scarratt, William K.
Inzana, Thomas J.
author_sort Petruzzi, Briana
collection PubMed
description Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida are two of multiple agents responsible for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cattle. Following respiratory infection of calves with H. somni, P. multocida may also be isolated from the lower respiratory tract. Because H. somni may form a biofilm during BRD, we sought to determine if P. multocida can co-exist with H. somni in a polymicrobial biofilm in vitro and in vivo. Interactions between the two species in the biofilm were characterized and quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The biofilm matrix of each species was examined using fluorescently tagged lectins (FTL) specific for the exopolysaccharide (EPS) using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Bacterial interactions were determined by auto-aggregation and biofilm morphology. Pasteurella multocida and H. somni were evenly distributed in the in vitro biofilm, and both species contributed to the polymicrobial biofilm matrix. The average biomass and biofilm thickness, and the total carbohydrate and protein content of the biofilm, were greatest when both species were present. Polymicrobial bacterial suspensions auto-aggregated faster than single species suspensions, suggesting physical interactions between the two species. Almost 300 P. multocida genes were significantly differentially regulated when the bacteria were in a polymicrobial biofilm compared to a mono-species biofilm, as determined by RNA-sequencing. As expected, host genes associated with inflammation and immune response were significantly upregulated at the infection site following H. somni challenge. Encapsulated P. multocida isolates not capable of forming a substantial biofilm enhanced an in vitro polymicrobial biofilm with H. somni, indicating they contributed to the polymicrobial biofilm matrix. Indirect evidence indicated that encapsulated P. multocida also contributed to a polymicrobial biofilm in vivo. Only the EPS of H. somni could be detected by FTL staining of bovine tissues following challenge with H. somni. However, both species were isolated and an immune response to the biofilm matrix of both species was greater than the response to planktonic cells, suggesting encapsulated P. multocida may take advantage of the H. somni biofilm to persist in the host during chronic BRD. These results may have important implications for the management and prevention of BRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73666592020-08-03 Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida Petruzzi, Briana Dickerman, Allan Lahmers, Kevin Scarratt, William K. Inzana, Thomas J. Front Microbiol Microbiology Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida are two of multiple agents responsible for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cattle. Following respiratory infection of calves with H. somni, P. multocida may also be isolated from the lower respiratory tract. Because H. somni may form a biofilm during BRD, we sought to determine if P. multocida can co-exist with H. somni in a polymicrobial biofilm in vitro and in vivo. Interactions between the two species in the biofilm were characterized and quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The biofilm matrix of each species was examined using fluorescently tagged lectins (FTL) specific for the exopolysaccharide (EPS) using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Bacterial interactions were determined by auto-aggregation and biofilm morphology. Pasteurella multocida and H. somni were evenly distributed in the in vitro biofilm, and both species contributed to the polymicrobial biofilm matrix. The average biomass and biofilm thickness, and the total carbohydrate and protein content of the biofilm, were greatest when both species were present. Polymicrobial bacterial suspensions auto-aggregated faster than single species suspensions, suggesting physical interactions between the two species. Almost 300 P. multocida genes were significantly differentially regulated when the bacteria were in a polymicrobial biofilm compared to a mono-species biofilm, as determined by RNA-sequencing. As expected, host genes associated with inflammation and immune response were significantly upregulated at the infection site following H. somni challenge. Encapsulated P. multocida isolates not capable of forming a substantial biofilm enhanced an in vitro polymicrobial biofilm with H. somni, indicating they contributed to the polymicrobial biofilm matrix. Indirect evidence indicated that encapsulated P. multocida also contributed to a polymicrobial biofilm in vivo. Only the EPS of H. somni could be detected by FTL staining of bovine tissues following challenge with H. somni. However, both species were isolated and an immune response to the biofilm matrix of both species was greater than the response to planktonic cells, suggesting encapsulated P. multocida may take advantage of the H. somni biofilm to persist in the host during chronic BRD. These results may have important implications for the management and prevention of BRD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7366659/ /pubmed/32754136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01561 Text en Copyright © 2020 Petruzzi, Dickerman, Lahmers, Scarratt and Inzana. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Petruzzi, Briana
Dickerman, Allan
Lahmers, Kevin
Scarratt, William K.
Inzana, Thomas J.
Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title_full Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title_fullStr Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title_full_unstemmed Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title_short Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction Between Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida
title_sort polymicrobial biofilm interaction between histophilus somni and pasteurella multocida
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01561
work_keys_str_mv AT petruzzibriana polymicrobialbiofilminteractionbetweenhistophilussomniandpasteurellamultocida
AT dickermanallan polymicrobialbiofilminteractionbetweenhistophilussomniandpasteurellamultocida
AT lahmerskevin polymicrobialbiofilminteractionbetweenhistophilussomniandpasteurellamultocida
AT scarrattwilliamk polymicrobialbiofilminteractionbetweenhistophilussomniandpasteurellamultocida
AT inzanathomasj polymicrobialbiofilminteractionbetweenhistophilussomniandpasteurellamultocida