Cargando…
Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x |
_version_ | 1783560275787513856 |
---|---|
author | Spassov, Sashko Wenzel, Christin Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Boycheva, Dimona Streicher, Lea Schmidt, Johannes Schumann, Stefan |
author_facet | Spassov, Sashko Wenzel, Christin Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Boycheva, Dimona Streicher, Lea Schmidt, Johannes Schumann, Stefan |
author_sort | Spassov, Sashko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway pressure decline and decelerated expiratory flow during expiration implied lung protective capacities. We assumed that ventilation with a smoothed, i.e. sinusoidal airway pressure profile may further improve ventilation efficiency and lung protection. We compared the effects of mechanical ventilation with sinusoidal airway pressure profile (SINE) regarding gas exchange, respiratory system compliance and histology to conventional volume and pressure controlled ventilation (VCV and PCV) and to VCV with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) in two rat models of lung injury, tween induced surfactant depletion and high tidal volume mechanical ventilation. In both lung injury models ventilation with SINE showed more efficient CO(2) elimination and blood oxygenation, improved respiratory system compliance and resulted in lower alveolar wall thickness, compared to VCV, PCV and FLEX. Optimization of the airway pressure profile may provide a novel means of lung protective mechanical ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7366701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73667012020-07-17 Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation Spassov, Sashko Wenzel, Christin Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Boycheva, Dimona Streicher, Lea Schmidt, Johannes Schumann, Stefan Sci Rep Article Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway pressure decline and decelerated expiratory flow during expiration implied lung protective capacities. We assumed that ventilation with a smoothed, i.e. sinusoidal airway pressure profile may further improve ventilation efficiency and lung protection. We compared the effects of mechanical ventilation with sinusoidal airway pressure profile (SINE) regarding gas exchange, respiratory system compliance and histology to conventional volume and pressure controlled ventilation (VCV and PCV) and to VCV with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) in two rat models of lung injury, tween induced surfactant depletion and high tidal volume mechanical ventilation. In both lung injury models ventilation with SINE showed more efficient CO(2) elimination and blood oxygenation, improved respiratory system compliance and resulted in lower alveolar wall thickness, compared to VCV, PCV and FLEX. Optimization of the airway pressure profile may provide a novel means of lung protective mechanical ventilation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366701/ /pubmed/32678177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Spassov, Sashko Wenzel, Christin Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Boycheva, Dimona Streicher, Lea Schmidt, Johannes Schumann, Stefan Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title | Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title_full | Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title_fullStr | Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title_short | Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
title_sort | sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spassovsashko sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT wenzelchristin sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT lozanozahonerosara sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT boychevadimona sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT streicherlea sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT schmidtjohannes sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation AT schumannstefan sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation |