Cargando…

Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation

Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spassov, Sashko, Wenzel, Christin, Lozano-Zahonero, Sara, Boycheva, Dimona, Streicher, Lea, Schmidt, Johannes, Schumann, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x
_version_ 1783560275787513856
author Spassov, Sashko
Wenzel, Christin
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Boycheva, Dimona
Streicher, Lea
Schmidt, Johannes
Schumann, Stefan
author_facet Spassov, Sashko
Wenzel, Christin
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Boycheva, Dimona
Streicher, Lea
Schmidt, Johannes
Schumann, Stefan
author_sort Spassov, Sashko
collection PubMed
description Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway pressure decline and decelerated expiratory flow during expiration implied lung protective capacities. We assumed that ventilation with a smoothed, i.e. sinusoidal airway pressure profile may further improve ventilation efficiency and lung protection. We compared the effects of mechanical ventilation with sinusoidal airway pressure profile (SINE) regarding gas exchange, respiratory system compliance and histology to conventional volume and pressure controlled ventilation (VCV and PCV) and to VCV with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) in two rat models of lung injury, tween induced surfactant depletion and high tidal volume mechanical ventilation. In both lung injury models ventilation with SINE showed more efficient CO(2) elimination and blood oxygenation, improved respiratory system compliance and resulted in lower alveolar wall thickness, compared to VCV, PCV and FLEX. Optimization of the airway pressure profile may provide a novel means of lung protective mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73667012020-07-17 Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation Spassov, Sashko Wenzel, Christin Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Boycheva, Dimona Streicher, Lea Schmidt, Johannes Schumann, Stefan Sci Rep Article Mechanical ventilation is associated with the risk of ventilator induced lung injury. For reducing lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, the application of small tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures has become clinical standard. Recently, an approach based on linear airway pressure decline and decelerated expiratory flow during expiration implied lung protective capacities. We assumed that ventilation with a smoothed, i.e. sinusoidal airway pressure profile may further improve ventilation efficiency and lung protection. We compared the effects of mechanical ventilation with sinusoidal airway pressure profile (SINE) regarding gas exchange, respiratory system compliance and histology to conventional volume and pressure controlled ventilation (VCV and PCV) and to VCV with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) in two rat models of lung injury, tween induced surfactant depletion and high tidal volume mechanical ventilation. In both lung injury models ventilation with SINE showed more efficient CO(2) elimination and blood oxygenation, improved respiratory system compliance and resulted in lower alveolar wall thickness, compared to VCV, PCV and FLEX. Optimization of the airway pressure profile may provide a novel means of lung protective mechanical ventilation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366701/ /pubmed/32678177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Spassov, Sashko
Wenzel, Christin
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Boycheva, Dimona
Streicher, Lea
Schmidt, Johannes
Schumann, Stefan
Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title_full Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title_fullStr Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title_short Sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
title_sort sine ventilation in lung injury models: a new perspective for lung protective ventilation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68614-x
work_keys_str_mv AT spassovsashko sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT wenzelchristin sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT lozanozahonerosara sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT boychevadimona sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT streicherlea sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT schmidtjohannes sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation
AT schumannstefan sineventilationinlunginjurymodelsanewperspectiveforlungprotectiveventilation