Cargando…

Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography

We present a non-invasive (albeit contact) method based on Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) enabling the in vivo segmentation of morphological tissue constituents, in particular, monitoring of morphological alterations during both tumor development and its response to therapies. The method uses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plekhanov, Anton A., Sirotkina, Marina A., Sovetsky, Alexander A., Gubarkova, Ekaterina V., Kuznetsov, Sergey S., Matveyev, Alexander L., Matveev, Lev A., Zagaynova, Elena V., Gladkova, Natalia D., Zaitsev, Vladimir Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68631-w
_version_ 1783560278353379328
author Plekhanov, Anton A.
Sirotkina, Marina A.
Sovetsky, Alexander A.
Gubarkova, Ekaterina V.
Kuznetsov, Sergey S.
Matveyev, Alexander L.
Matveev, Lev A.
Zagaynova, Elena V.
Gladkova, Natalia D.
Zaitsev, Vladimir Y.
author_facet Plekhanov, Anton A.
Sirotkina, Marina A.
Sovetsky, Alexander A.
Gubarkova, Ekaterina V.
Kuznetsov, Sergey S.
Matveyev, Alexander L.
Matveev, Lev A.
Zagaynova, Elena V.
Gladkova, Natalia D.
Zaitsev, Vladimir Y.
author_sort Plekhanov, Anton A.
collection PubMed
description We present a non-invasive (albeit contact) method based on Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) enabling the in vivo segmentation of morphological tissue constituents, in particular, monitoring of morphological alterations during both tumor development and its response to therapies. The method uses compressional OCE to reconstruct tissue stiffness map as the first step. Then the OCE-image is divided into regions, for which the Young’s modulus (stiffness) falls in specific ranges corresponding to the morphological constituents to be discriminated. These stiffness ranges (characteristic "stiffness spectra") are initially determined by careful comparison of the "gold-standard" histological data and the OCE-based stiffness map for the corresponding tissue regions. After such pre-calibration, the results of morphological segmentation of OCE-images demonstrate a striking similarity with the histological results in terms of percentage of the segmented zones. To validate the sensitivity of the OCE-method and demonstrate its high correlation with conventional histological segmentation we present results obtained in vivo on a murine model of breast cancer in comparative experimental study of the efficacy of two antitumor chemotherapeutic drugs with different mechanisms of action. The new technique allowed in vivo monitoring and quantitative segmentation of (1) viable, (2) dystrophic, (3) necrotic tumor cells and (4) edema zones very similar to morphological segmentation of histological images. Numerous applications in other experimental/clinical areas requiring rapid, nearly real-time, quantitative assessment of tissue structure can be foreseen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73667132020-07-17 Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography Plekhanov, Anton A. Sirotkina, Marina A. Sovetsky, Alexander A. Gubarkova, Ekaterina V. Kuznetsov, Sergey S. Matveyev, Alexander L. Matveev, Lev A. Zagaynova, Elena V. Gladkova, Natalia D. Zaitsev, Vladimir Y. Sci Rep Article We present a non-invasive (albeit contact) method based on Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) enabling the in vivo segmentation of morphological tissue constituents, in particular, monitoring of morphological alterations during both tumor development and its response to therapies. The method uses compressional OCE to reconstruct tissue stiffness map as the first step. Then the OCE-image is divided into regions, for which the Young’s modulus (stiffness) falls in specific ranges corresponding to the morphological constituents to be discriminated. These stiffness ranges (characteristic "stiffness spectra") are initially determined by careful comparison of the "gold-standard" histological data and the OCE-based stiffness map for the corresponding tissue regions. After such pre-calibration, the results of morphological segmentation of OCE-images demonstrate a striking similarity with the histological results in terms of percentage of the segmented zones. To validate the sensitivity of the OCE-method and demonstrate its high correlation with conventional histological segmentation we present results obtained in vivo on a murine model of breast cancer in comparative experimental study of the efficacy of two antitumor chemotherapeutic drugs with different mechanisms of action. The new technique allowed in vivo monitoring and quantitative segmentation of (1) viable, (2) dystrophic, (3) necrotic tumor cells and (4) edema zones very similar to morphological segmentation of histological images. Numerous applications in other experimental/clinical areas requiring rapid, nearly real-time, quantitative assessment of tissue structure can be foreseen. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366713/ /pubmed/32678175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68631-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Plekhanov, Anton A.
Sirotkina, Marina A.
Sovetsky, Alexander A.
Gubarkova, Ekaterina V.
Kuznetsov, Sergey S.
Matveyev, Alexander L.
Matveev, Lev A.
Zagaynova, Elena V.
Gladkova, Natalia D.
Zaitsev, Vladimir Y.
Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title_full Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title_fullStr Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title_full_unstemmed Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title_short Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography
title_sort histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by optical coherence elastography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68631-w
work_keys_str_mv AT plekhanovantona histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT sirotkinamarinaa histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT sovetskyalexandera histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT gubarkovaekaterinav histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT kuznetsovsergeys histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT matveyevalexanderl histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT matveevleva histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT zagaynovaelenav histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT gladkovanataliad histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography
AT zaitsevvladimiry histologicalvalidationofinvivoassessmentofcancertissueinhomogeneityandautomatedmorphologicalsegmentationenabledbyopticalcoherenceelastography