Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the antifungal efficacy of MTA Fillapex, Metapex, zinc oxide eugenol cement, Endomethasone, and Endoflas against Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal exudates of 30 patients were tested against MTA Fillapex (Angelus)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Sameep, Srivastava, Binita, Gupta, Khyati, Gupta, Nidhi, Singh, Rashi, Singh, Satyavir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718
_version_ 1783560286978965504
author Singh, Sameep
Srivastava, Binita
Gupta, Khyati
Gupta, Nidhi
Singh, Rashi
Singh, Satyavir
author_facet Singh, Sameep
Srivastava, Binita
Gupta, Khyati
Gupta, Nidhi
Singh, Rashi
Singh, Satyavir
author_sort Singh, Sameep
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the antifungal efficacy of MTA Fillapex, Metapex, zinc oxide eugenol cement, Endomethasone, and Endoflas against Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal exudates of 30 patients were tested against MTA Fillapex (Angelus), Metapex (BioMed), zinc oxide eugenol (Deepak Enterprise), Endomethasone (Septodont), Endoflas FS (Sanlor Laboratories), MTA (Angelus) (positive control), and glycerine (negative control). Children with failed endodontic cases were included in the study. Tube dilution and agar diffusion methods were used to check the antifungal efficacy of the root canal sealers. In tube dilution method, 24-well culture plates containing freshly mixed material along with Candida albicans were used. Wells containing MTA (Angelus) along with Sabouraud dextrose agar and Candida albicans served as positive control while glycerine along with Sabouraud dextrose agar and Candida albicans served as negative control. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Growth of the fungi was monitored after 24 hours by the presence of the turbidity. The samples were recultured to test the experimental material using agar well diffusion method, and the Petri plates were incubated for 24 hours and 72 hours. Zone of inhibition was measured after respective time period. Paired t test was used for the data analysis. RESULTS: It was seen in tube dilution method Endomethasone showed least turbidity while maximum was shown by Metapex; similar results were seen in case of agar well diffusion method in which largest zone of inhibition was shown by Endomethasone while smallest was by Metapex. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that Endomethasone showed maximum efficacy against Candida albicans as compared to Metapex. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh S, Srivastava B, Gupta K, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(2):119–123.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73667572020-07-31 Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study Singh, Sameep Srivastava, Binita Gupta, Khyati Gupta, Nidhi Singh, Rashi Singh, Satyavir Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the antifungal efficacy of MTA Fillapex, Metapex, zinc oxide eugenol cement, Endomethasone, and Endoflas against Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal exudates of 30 patients were tested against MTA Fillapex (Angelus), Metapex (BioMed), zinc oxide eugenol (Deepak Enterprise), Endomethasone (Septodont), Endoflas FS (Sanlor Laboratories), MTA (Angelus) (positive control), and glycerine (negative control). Children with failed endodontic cases were included in the study. Tube dilution and agar diffusion methods were used to check the antifungal efficacy of the root canal sealers. In tube dilution method, 24-well culture plates containing freshly mixed material along with Candida albicans were used. Wells containing MTA (Angelus) along with Sabouraud dextrose agar and Candida albicans served as positive control while glycerine along with Sabouraud dextrose agar and Candida albicans served as negative control. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Growth of the fungi was monitored after 24 hours by the presence of the turbidity. The samples were recultured to test the experimental material using agar well diffusion method, and the Petri plates were incubated for 24 hours and 72 hours. Zone of inhibition was measured after respective time period. Paired t test was used for the data analysis. RESULTS: It was seen in tube dilution method Endomethasone showed least turbidity while maximum was shown by Metapex; similar results were seen in case of agar well diffusion method in which largest zone of inhibition was shown by Endomethasone while smallest was by Metapex. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that Endomethasone showed maximum efficacy against Candida albicans as compared to Metapex. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh S, Srivastava B, Gupta K, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(2):119–123. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7366757/ /pubmed/32742086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Sameep
Srivastava, Binita
Gupta, Khyati
Gupta, Nidhi
Singh, Rashi
Singh, Satyavir
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of antifungal efficacy of five root canal sealers against clinical isolates of candida albicans: a microbiological study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsameep comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy
AT srivastavabinita comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy
AT guptakhyati comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy
AT guptanidhi comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy
AT singhrashi comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy
AT singhsatyavir comparativeevaluationofantifungalefficacyoffiverootcanalsealersagainstclinicalisolatesofcandidaalbicansamicrobiologicalstudy