Cargando…

Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice

Interventional radiology plays an important and increasing role in cancer treatment. Follow-up is important to be able to assess treatment success and detect locoregional and distant recurrence and recommendations for follow-up are needed. At ECIO 2018, a joint ECIO-ESOI session was organized to est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maas, Monique, Beets-Tan, Regina, Gaubert, Jean-Yves, Gomez Munoz, Fernando, Habert, Paul, Klompenhouwer, Lisa G., Vilares Morgado, Paulo, Schaefer, Niklaus, Cornelis, Francois H., Solomon, Stephen B., van der Reijd, Denise, Bilbao, Jose Ignacio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00884-5
_version_ 1783560304317169664
author Maas, Monique
Beets-Tan, Regina
Gaubert, Jean-Yves
Gomez Munoz, Fernando
Habert, Paul
Klompenhouwer, Lisa G.
Vilares Morgado, Paulo
Schaefer, Niklaus
Cornelis, Francois H.
Solomon, Stephen B.
van der Reijd, Denise
Bilbao, Jose Ignacio
author_facet Maas, Monique
Beets-Tan, Regina
Gaubert, Jean-Yves
Gomez Munoz, Fernando
Habert, Paul
Klompenhouwer, Lisa G.
Vilares Morgado, Paulo
Schaefer, Niklaus
Cornelis, Francois H.
Solomon, Stephen B.
van der Reijd, Denise
Bilbao, Jose Ignacio
author_sort Maas, Monique
collection PubMed
description Interventional radiology plays an important and increasing role in cancer treatment. Follow-up is important to be able to assess treatment success and detect locoregional and distant recurrence and recommendations for follow-up are needed. At ECIO 2018, a joint ECIO-ESOI session was organized to establish follow-up recommendations for oncologic intervention in liver, renal, and lung cancer. Treatments included thermal ablation, TACE, and TARE. In total five topics were evaluated: ablation in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), TARE in CRLM, TACE and TARE in HCC, ablation in renal cancer, and ablation in lung cancer. Evaluated modalities were FDG-PET-CT, CT, MRI, and (contrast-enhanced) ultrasound. Prior to the session, five experts were selected and performed a systematic review and presented statements, which were voted on in a telephone conference prior to the meeting by all panelists. These statements were presented and discussed at the ECIO-ESOI session at ECIO 2018. This paper presents the recommendations that followed from these initiatives. Based on expert opinions and the available evidence, follow-up schedules were proposed for liver cancer, renal cancer, and lung cancer. FDG-PET-CT, CT, and MRI are the recommended modalities, but one should beware of false-positive signs of residual tumor or recurrence due to inflammation early after the intervention. There is a need for prospective preferably multicenter studies to validate new techniques and new response criteria. This paper presents recommendations that can be used in clinical practice to perform the follow-up of patients with liver, lung, and renal cancer who were treated with interventional locoregional therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7366866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73668662020-07-21 Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice Maas, Monique Beets-Tan, Regina Gaubert, Jean-Yves Gomez Munoz, Fernando Habert, Paul Klompenhouwer, Lisa G. Vilares Morgado, Paulo Schaefer, Niklaus Cornelis, Francois H. Solomon, Stephen B. van der Reijd, Denise Bilbao, Jose Ignacio Insights Imaging Guideline Interventional radiology plays an important and increasing role in cancer treatment. Follow-up is important to be able to assess treatment success and detect locoregional and distant recurrence and recommendations for follow-up are needed. At ECIO 2018, a joint ECIO-ESOI session was organized to establish follow-up recommendations for oncologic intervention in liver, renal, and lung cancer. Treatments included thermal ablation, TACE, and TARE. In total five topics were evaluated: ablation in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), TARE in CRLM, TACE and TARE in HCC, ablation in renal cancer, and ablation in lung cancer. Evaluated modalities were FDG-PET-CT, CT, MRI, and (contrast-enhanced) ultrasound. Prior to the session, five experts were selected and performed a systematic review and presented statements, which were voted on in a telephone conference prior to the meeting by all panelists. These statements were presented and discussed at the ECIO-ESOI session at ECIO 2018. This paper presents the recommendations that followed from these initiatives. Based on expert opinions and the available evidence, follow-up schedules were proposed for liver cancer, renal cancer, and lung cancer. FDG-PET-CT, CT, and MRI are the recommended modalities, but one should beware of false-positive signs of residual tumor or recurrence due to inflammation early after the intervention. There is a need for prospective preferably multicenter studies to validate new techniques and new response criteria. This paper presents recommendations that can be used in clinical practice to perform the follow-up of patients with liver, lung, and renal cancer who were treated with interventional locoregional therapies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7366866/ /pubmed/32676924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00884-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Guideline
Maas, Monique
Beets-Tan, Regina
Gaubert, Jean-Yves
Gomez Munoz, Fernando
Habert, Paul
Klompenhouwer, Lisa G.
Vilares Morgado, Paulo
Schaefer, Niklaus
Cornelis, Francois H.
Solomon, Stephen B.
van der Reijd, Denise
Bilbao, Jose Ignacio
Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title_full Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title_fullStr Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title_short Follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ECIO-ESOI evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
title_sort follow-up after radiological intervention in oncology: ecio-esoi evidence and consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00884-5
work_keys_str_mv AT maasmonique followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT beetstanregina followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT gaubertjeanyves followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT gomezmunozfernando followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT habertpaul followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT klompenhouwerlisag followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT vilaresmorgadopaulo followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT schaeferniklaus followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT cornelisfrancoish followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT solomonstephenb followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT vanderreijddenise followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT bilbaojoseignacio followupafterradiologicalinterventioninoncologyecioesoievidenceandconsensusbasedrecommendationsforclinicalpractice