Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”

In their Commentary Saber et al. (Part Fibre Toxicol 16: 44, 2019) argue that chronic inhalation studies in rats can be used for assessing the lung cancer risk of insoluble nanomaterials. The authors make several significant errors in their interpretation and representation of the underlying science...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Driscoll, Kevin E., Borm, Paul A., Chaudhuri, Ishrat, Levy, Len, Yong, Mei, Warheit, David, McCunney, Robert, Oberdörster, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00365-z
_version_ 1783560403625705472
author Driscoll, Kevin E.
Borm, Paul A.
Chaudhuri, Ishrat
Levy, Len
Yong, Mei
Warheit, David
McCunney, Robert
Oberdörster, Günter
author_facet Driscoll, Kevin E.
Borm, Paul A.
Chaudhuri, Ishrat
Levy, Len
Yong, Mei
Warheit, David
McCunney, Robert
Oberdörster, Günter
author_sort Driscoll, Kevin E.
collection PubMed
description In their Commentary Saber et al. (Part Fibre Toxicol 16: 44, 2019) argue that chronic inhalation studies in rats can be used for assessing the lung cancer risk of insoluble nanomaterials. The authors make several significant errors in their interpretation and representation of the underlying science. In this Letter to the Editor we discuss these inaccuracies to correct the scientific record. When the science is recounted accurately it does not support Saber et al’s statements and conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73673322020-07-20 Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation” Driscoll, Kevin E. Borm, Paul A. Chaudhuri, Ishrat Levy, Len Yong, Mei Warheit, David McCunney, Robert Oberdörster, Günter Part Fibre Toxicol Letter to the Editor In their Commentary Saber et al. (Part Fibre Toxicol 16: 44, 2019) argue that chronic inhalation studies in rats can be used for assessing the lung cancer risk of insoluble nanomaterials. The authors make several significant errors in their interpretation and representation of the underlying science. In this Letter to the Editor we discuss these inaccuracies to correct the scientific record. When the science is recounted accurately it does not support Saber et al’s statements and conclusions. BioMed Central 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7367332/ /pubmed/32678050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00365-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Driscoll, Kevin E.
Borm, Paul A.
Chaudhuri, Ishrat
Levy, Len
Yong, Mei
Warheit, David
McCunney, Robert
Oberdörster, Günter
Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title_full Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title_fullStr Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title_full_unstemmed Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title_short Comment on Saber et al. (2019), “Commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
title_sort comment on saber et al. (2019), “commentary: the chronic inhalation study in rats for assessing lung cancer risk may be better than its reputation”
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00365-z
work_keys_str_mv AT driscollkevine commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT bormpaula commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT chaudhuriishrat commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT levylen commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT yongmei commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT warheitdavid commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT mccunneyrobert commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation
AT oberdorstergunter commentonsaberetal2019commentarythechronicinhalationstudyinratsforassessinglungcancerriskmaybebetterthanitsreputation

Ejemplares similares