Cargando…

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies

BACKGROUND: DNA extraction is an important factor influencing the microbiome profile in fecal samples. Considering that the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, one of the most commonly used DNA extraction kits, is no longer manufactured, this study aimed to investigate whether a new commercially available ki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Mi Young, Park, Yong-Soo, Kim, Jung-Ha, Nam, Young-Do
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32680572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5
_version_ 1783560413297770496
author Lim, Mi Young
Park, Yong-Soo
Kim, Jung-Ha
Nam, Young-Do
author_facet Lim, Mi Young
Park, Yong-Soo
Kim, Jung-Ha
Nam, Young-Do
author_sort Lim, Mi Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA extraction is an important factor influencing the microbiome profile in fecal samples. Considering that the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, one of the most commonly used DNA extraction kits, is no longer manufactured, this study aimed to investigate whether a new commercially available kit, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, yields comparable microbiome profiles with those previously obtained using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit. RESULTS: We extracted DNA from fecal samples of 10 individuals using three protocols (protocol P of the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, and protocols SB and S of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with and without an additional bead-beating step, respectively) in triplicate. Ninety extracted DNA samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA quality measured by 260/280 absorbance ratios was found to be optimal in protocol P. Additionally, the DNA quantity and microbiome diversity obtained using protocol P were significantly higher than those of protocol S, however, did not differ significantly from those of protocol SB. Based on the overall microbiome profiles, variations between protocol P and protocol SB or S were significantly less than between-individual variations. Furthermore, most genera were not differentially abundant in protocol P compared to the other protocols, and the number of differentially abundant genera, as well as the degree of fold-changes were smaller between protocols P and SB than between protocols P and S. CONCLUSIONS: The QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit exhibited microbiome analysis results that were comparable with those of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with a bead-beating step. These results will prove useful for researchers investigating the gut microbiome in selecting an alternative protocol to the widely used but discontinued kit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73673762020-07-20 Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies Lim, Mi Young Park, Yong-Soo Kim, Jung-Ha Nam, Young-Do BMC Microbiol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA extraction is an important factor influencing the microbiome profile in fecal samples. Considering that the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, one of the most commonly used DNA extraction kits, is no longer manufactured, this study aimed to investigate whether a new commercially available kit, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, yields comparable microbiome profiles with those previously obtained using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit. RESULTS: We extracted DNA from fecal samples of 10 individuals using three protocols (protocol P of the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, and protocols SB and S of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with and without an additional bead-beating step, respectively) in triplicate. Ninety extracted DNA samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA quality measured by 260/280 absorbance ratios was found to be optimal in protocol P. Additionally, the DNA quantity and microbiome diversity obtained using protocol P were significantly higher than those of protocol S, however, did not differ significantly from those of protocol SB. Based on the overall microbiome profiles, variations between protocol P and protocol SB or S were significantly less than between-individual variations. Furthermore, most genera were not differentially abundant in protocol P compared to the other protocols, and the number of differentially abundant genera, as well as the degree of fold-changes were smaller between protocols P and SB than between protocols P and S. CONCLUSIONS: The QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit exhibited microbiome analysis results that were comparable with those of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with a bead-beating step. These results will prove useful for researchers investigating the gut microbiome in selecting an alternative protocol to the widely used but discontinued kit. BioMed Central 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367376/ /pubmed/32680572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Lim, Mi Young
Park, Yong-Soo
Kim, Jung-Ha
Nam, Young-Do
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title_full Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title_short Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
title_sort evaluation of fecal dna extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32680572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5
work_keys_str_mv AT limmiyoung evaluationoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsforhumangutmicrobiomestudies
AT parkyongsoo evaluationoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsforhumangutmicrobiomestudies
AT kimjungha evaluationoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsforhumangutmicrobiomestudies
AT namyoungdo evaluationoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsforhumangutmicrobiomestudies