Cargando…

Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan, Huang, James L., Zhang, Hao H., Weiss, Jeremy C., Kwoh, C. Kent, Donohue, Julie M., Gordon, Adam J., Cochran, Gerald, Malone, Daniel C., Kuza, Courtney C., Gellad, Walid F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981
_version_ 1783560426080960512
author Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
Huang, James L.
Zhang, Hao H.
Weiss, Jeremy C.
Kwoh, C. Kent
Donohue, Julie M.
Gordon, Adam J.
Cochran, Gerald
Malone, Daniel C.
Kuza, Courtney C.
Gellad, Walid F.
author_facet Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
Huang, James L.
Zhang, Hao H.
Weiss, Jeremy C.
Kwoh, C. Kent
Donohue, Julie M.
Gordon, Adam J.
Cochran, Gerald
Malone, Daniel C.
Kuza, Courtney C.
Gellad, Walid F.
author_sort Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescriptions from 2011–2016. We randomly divided beneficiaries into training, testing, and validation samples. We measured 269 potential predictors including socio-demographics, health status, patterns of opioid use, and provider-level and regional-level factors in 3-month periods, starting from three months before initiating opioids until development of OUD, loss of follow-up or end of 2016. The primary outcome was a recorded OUD diagnosis or initiating methadone or buprenorphine for OUD as proxy of incident OUD. We applied elastic net, random forests, gradient boosting machine, and deep neural network to predict OUD in the subsequent three months. We assessed prediction performance using C-statistics and other metrics (e.g., number needed to evaluate to identify an individual with OUD [NNE]). Beneficiaries were stratified into subgroups by risk-score decile. RESULTS: The training (n = 120,474), testing (n = 120,556), and validation (n = 120,497) samples had similar characteristics (age ≥65 years = 81.1%; female = 61.3%; white = 83.5%; with disability eligibility = 25.5%; 1.5% had incident OUD). In the validation sample, the four approaches had similar prediction performances (C-statistic ranged from 0.874 to 0.882); elastic net required the fewest predictors (n = 48). Using the elastic net algorithm, individuals in the top decile of risk (15.8% [n = 19,047] of validation cohort) had a positive predictive value of 0.96%, negative predictive value of 99.7%, and NNE of 104. Nearly 70% of individuals with incident OUD were in the top two deciles (n = 37,078), having highest incident OUD (36 to 301 per 10,000 beneficiaries). Individuals in the bottom eight deciles (n = 83,419) had minimal incident OUD (3 to 28 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning algorithms improve risk prediction and risk stratification of incident OUD in Medicare beneficiaries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73674532020-08-05 Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Huang, James L. Zhang, Hao H. Weiss, Jeremy C. Kwoh, C. Kent Donohue, Julie M. Gordon, Adam J. Cochran, Gerald Malone, Daniel C. Kuza, Courtney C. Gellad, Walid F. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescriptions from 2011–2016. We randomly divided beneficiaries into training, testing, and validation samples. We measured 269 potential predictors including socio-demographics, health status, patterns of opioid use, and provider-level and regional-level factors in 3-month periods, starting from three months before initiating opioids until development of OUD, loss of follow-up or end of 2016. The primary outcome was a recorded OUD diagnosis or initiating methadone or buprenorphine for OUD as proxy of incident OUD. We applied elastic net, random forests, gradient boosting machine, and deep neural network to predict OUD in the subsequent three months. We assessed prediction performance using C-statistics and other metrics (e.g., number needed to evaluate to identify an individual with OUD [NNE]). Beneficiaries were stratified into subgroups by risk-score decile. RESULTS: The training (n = 120,474), testing (n = 120,556), and validation (n = 120,497) samples had similar characteristics (age ≥65 years = 81.1%; female = 61.3%; white = 83.5%; with disability eligibility = 25.5%; 1.5% had incident OUD). In the validation sample, the four approaches had similar prediction performances (C-statistic ranged from 0.874 to 0.882); elastic net required the fewest predictors (n = 48). Using the elastic net algorithm, individuals in the top decile of risk (15.8% [n = 19,047] of validation cohort) had a positive predictive value of 0.96%, negative predictive value of 99.7%, and NNE of 104. Nearly 70% of individuals with incident OUD were in the top two deciles (n = 37,078), having highest incident OUD (36 to 301 per 10,000 beneficiaries). Individuals in the bottom eight deciles (n = 83,419) had minimal incident OUD (3 to 28 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning algorithms improve risk prediction and risk stratification of incident OUD in Medicare beneficiaries. Public Library of Science 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367453/ /pubmed/32678860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
Huang, James L.
Zhang, Hao H.
Weiss, Jeremy C.
Kwoh, C. Kent
Donohue, Julie M.
Gordon, Adam J.
Cochran, Gerald
Malone, Daniel C.
Kuza, Courtney C.
Gellad, Walid F.
Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title_full Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title_fullStr Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title_short Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
title_sort using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service medicare beneficiaries: a prognostic study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981
work_keys_str_mv AT lociganicweihsuan usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT huangjamesl usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT zhanghaoh usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT weissjeremyc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT kwohckent usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT donohuejuliem usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT gordonadamj usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT cochrangerald usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT malonedanielc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT kuzacourtneyc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy
AT gelladwalidf usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy