Cargando…
Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981 |
_version_ | 1783560426080960512 |
---|---|
author | Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Huang, James L. Zhang, Hao H. Weiss, Jeremy C. Kwoh, C. Kent Donohue, Julie M. Gordon, Adam J. Cochran, Gerald Malone, Daniel C. Kuza, Courtney C. Gellad, Walid F. |
author_facet | Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Huang, James L. Zhang, Hao H. Weiss, Jeremy C. Kwoh, C. Kent Donohue, Julie M. Gordon, Adam J. Cochran, Gerald Malone, Daniel C. Kuza, Courtney C. Gellad, Walid F. |
author_sort | Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescriptions from 2011–2016. We randomly divided beneficiaries into training, testing, and validation samples. We measured 269 potential predictors including socio-demographics, health status, patterns of opioid use, and provider-level and regional-level factors in 3-month periods, starting from three months before initiating opioids until development of OUD, loss of follow-up or end of 2016. The primary outcome was a recorded OUD diagnosis or initiating methadone or buprenorphine for OUD as proxy of incident OUD. We applied elastic net, random forests, gradient boosting machine, and deep neural network to predict OUD in the subsequent three months. We assessed prediction performance using C-statistics and other metrics (e.g., number needed to evaluate to identify an individual with OUD [NNE]). Beneficiaries were stratified into subgroups by risk-score decile. RESULTS: The training (n = 120,474), testing (n = 120,556), and validation (n = 120,497) samples had similar characteristics (age ≥65 years = 81.1%; female = 61.3%; white = 83.5%; with disability eligibility = 25.5%; 1.5% had incident OUD). In the validation sample, the four approaches had similar prediction performances (C-statistic ranged from 0.874 to 0.882); elastic net required the fewest predictors (n = 48). Using the elastic net algorithm, individuals in the top decile of risk (15.8% [n = 19,047] of validation cohort) had a positive predictive value of 0.96%, negative predictive value of 99.7%, and NNE of 104. Nearly 70% of individuals with incident OUD were in the top two deciles (n = 37,078), having highest incident OUD (36 to 301 per 10,000 beneficiaries). Individuals in the bottom eight deciles (n = 83,419) had minimal incident OUD (3 to 28 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning algorithms improve risk prediction and risk stratification of incident OUD in Medicare beneficiaries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7367453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73674532020-08-05 Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Huang, James L. Zhang, Hao H. Weiss, Jeremy C. Kwoh, C. Kent Donohue, Julie M. Gordon, Adam J. Cochran, Gerald Malone, Daniel C. Kuza, Courtney C. Gellad, Walid F. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to improve prediction of incident OUD diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This prognostic study included 361,527 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, without cancer, filling ≥1 opioid prescriptions from 2011–2016. We randomly divided beneficiaries into training, testing, and validation samples. We measured 269 potential predictors including socio-demographics, health status, patterns of opioid use, and provider-level and regional-level factors in 3-month periods, starting from three months before initiating opioids until development of OUD, loss of follow-up or end of 2016. The primary outcome was a recorded OUD diagnosis or initiating methadone or buprenorphine for OUD as proxy of incident OUD. We applied elastic net, random forests, gradient boosting machine, and deep neural network to predict OUD in the subsequent three months. We assessed prediction performance using C-statistics and other metrics (e.g., number needed to evaluate to identify an individual with OUD [NNE]). Beneficiaries were stratified into subgroups by risk-score decile. RESULTS: The training (n = 120,474), testing (n = 120,556), and validation (n = 120,497) samples had similar characteristics (age ≥65 years = 81.1%; female = 61.3%; white = 83.5%; with disability eligibility = 25.5%; 1.5% had incident OUD). In the validation sample, the four approaches had similar prediction performances (C-statistic ranged from 0.874 to 0.882); elastic net required the fewest predictors (n = 48). Using the elastic net algorithm, individuals in the top decile of risk (15.8% [n = 19,047] of validation cohort) had a positive predictive value of 0.96%, negative predictive value of 99.7%, and NNE of 104. Nearly 70% of individuals with incident OUD were in the top two deciles (n = 37,078), having highest incident OUD (36 to 301 per 10,000 beneficiaries). Individuals in the bottom eight deciles (n = 83,419) had minimal incident OUD (3 to 28 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning algorithms improve risk prediction and risk stratification of incident OUD in Medicare beneficiaries. Public Library of Science 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367453/ /pubmed/32678860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Huang, James L. Zhang, Hao H. Weiss, Jeremy C. Kwoh, C. Kent Donohue, Julie M. Gordon, Adam J. Cochran, Gerald Malone, Daniel C. Kuza, Courtney C. Gellad, Walid F. Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title | Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title_full | Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title_fullStr | Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title_short | Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study |
title_sort | using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service medicare beneficiaries: a prognostic study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lociganicweihsuan usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT huangjamesl usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT zhanghaoh usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT weissjeremyc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT kwohckent usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT donohuejuliem usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT gordonadamj usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT cochrangerald usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT malonedanielc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT kuzacourtneyc usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy AT gelladwalidf usingmachinelearningtopredictriskofincidentopioidusedisorderamongfeeforservicemedicarebeneficiariesaprognosticstudy |