Cargando…

Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health

BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schleider, Jessica Lee, Dobias, Mallory, Sung, Jenna, Mumper, Emma, Mullarkey, Michael C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602846
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513
_version_ 1783560442137804800
author Schleider, Jessica Lee
Dobias, Mallory
Sung, Jenna
Mumper, Emma
Mullarkey, Michael C
author_facet Schleider, Jessica Lee
Dobias, Mallory
Sung, Jenna
Mumper, Emma
Mullarkey, Michael C
author_sort Schleider, Jessica Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, particularly if they are freely available for as-needed use. However, the acceptability of online SSI and their efficacy have remained unexamined outside of controlled trials, and their practical utility is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the perceived acceptability and proximal effects of Project YES (Youth Empowerment & Support), an open-access platform offering three online SSIs for youth internalizing distress. METHODS: After selecting one of three SSIs to complete, participants (ages 11-17 years) reported pre- and post-SSI levels of clinically relevant outcomes that SSIs may target (eg, hopelessness, self-hate) and perceived SSI acceptability. User-pattern variables, demographics, and depressive symptoms were collected to characterize youths engaging with YES. RESULTS: From September 2019 through March 2020, 694 youths accessed YES, 539 began, and 187 completed a 30-minute, self-guided SSI. SSI completers reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, on average, and were diverse on several dimensions (53.75% non-white; 78.10% female; 43.23% sexual minorities). Regardless of SSI selection, completers reported pre- to post-program reductions in hopelessness (d(av)=0.53; d(z)=0.71), self-hate (d(av)=0.32; d(z)=0.61), perceived control (d(av)=0.60; d(z)=0.72) and agency (d(av)=0.39; d(z)=0.50). Youths rated all SSIs as acceptable (eg, enjoyable, likely to help peers). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the perceived acceptability and utility of open-access, free-of-charge SSIs for youth experiencing internalizing distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework; osf.io/e52p3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73675402020-08-07 Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health Schleider, Jessica Lee Dobias, Mallory Sung, Jenna Mumper, Emma Mullarkey, Michael C JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, particularly if they are freely available for as-needed use. However, the acceptability of online SSI and their efficacy have remained unexamined outside of controlled trials, and their practical utility is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the perceived acceptability and proximal effects of Project YES (Youth Empowerment & Support), an open-access platform offering three online SSIs for youth internalizing distress. METHODS: After selecting one of three SSIs to complete, participants (ages 11-17 years) reported pre- and post-SSI levels of clinically relevant outcomes that SSIs may target (eg, hopelessness, self-hate) and perceived SSI acceptability. User-pattern variables, demographics, and depressive symptoms were collected to characterize youths engaging with YES. RESULTS: From September 2019 through March 2020, 694 youths accessed YES, 539 began, and 187 completed a 30-minute, self-guided SSI. SSI completers reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, on average, and were diverse on several dimensions (53.75% non-white; 78.10% female; 43.23% sexual minorities). Regardless of SSI selection, completers reported pre- to post-program reductions in hopelessness (d(av)=0.53; d(z)=0.71), self-hate (d(av)=0.32; d(z)=0.61), perceived control (d(av)=0.60; d(z)=0.72) and agency (d(av)=0.39; d(z)=0.50). Youths rated all SSIs as acceptable (eg, enjoyable, likely to help peers). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the perceived acceptability and utility of open-access, free-of-charge SSIs for youth experiencing internalizing distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework; osf.io/e52p3 JMIR Publications 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7367540/ /pubmed/32602846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513 Text en ©Jessica Lee Schleider, Mallory Dobias, Jenna Sung, Emma Mumper, Michael C Mullarkey. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 30.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Schleider, Jessica Lee
Dobias, Mallory
Sung, Jenna
Mumper, Emma
Mullarkey, Michael C
Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title_full Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title_fullStr Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title_short Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
title_sort acceptability and utility of an open-access, online single-session intervention platform for adolescent mental health
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602846
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513
work_keys_str_mv AT schleiderjessicalee acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth
AT dobiasmallory acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth
AT sungjenna acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth
AT mumperemma acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth
AT mullarkeymichaelc acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth