Cargando…
Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health
BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, partic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513 |
_version_ | 1783560442137804800 |
---|---|
author | Schleider, Jessica Lee Dobias, Mallory Sung, Jenna Mumper, Emma Mullarkey, Michael C |
author_facet | Schleider, Jessica Lee Dobias, Mallory Sung, Jenna Mumper, Emma Mullarkey, Michael C |
author_sort | Schleider, Jessica Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, particularly if they are freely available for as-needed use. However, the acceptability of online SSI and their efficacy have remained unexamined outside of controlled trials, and their practical utility is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the perceived acceptability and proximal effects of Project YES (Youth Empowerment & Support), an open-access platform offering three online SSIs for youth internalizing distress. METHODS: After selecting one of three SSIs to complete, participants (ages 11-17 years) reported pre- and post-SSI levels of clinically relevant outcomes that SSIs may target (eg, hopelessness, self-hate) and perceived SSI acceptability. User-pattern variables, demographics, and depressive symptoms were collected to characterize youths engaging with YES. RESULTS: From September 2019 through March 2020, 694 youths accessed YES, 539 began, and 187 completed a 30-minute, self-guided SSI. SSI completers reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, on average, and were diverse on several dimensions (53.75% non-white; 78.10% female; 43.23% sexual minorities). Regardless of SSI selection, completers reported pre- to post-program reductions in hopelessness (d(av)=0.53; d(z)=0.71), self-hate (d(av)=0.32; d(z)=0.61), perceived control (d(av)=0.60; d(z)=0.72) and agency (d(av)=0.39; d(z)=0.50). Youths rated all SSIs as acceptable (eg, enjoyable, likely to help peers). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the perceived acceptability and utility of open-access, free-of-charge SSIs for youth experiencing internalizing distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework; osf.io/e52p3 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7367540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73675402020-08-07 Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health Schleider, Jessica Lee Dobias, Mallory Sung, Jenna Mumper, Emma Mullarkey, Michael C JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Many youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, particularly if they are freely available for as-needed use. However, the acceptability of online SSI and their efficacy have remained unexamined outside of controlled trials, and their practical utility is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the perceived acceptability and proximal effects of Project YES (Youth Empowerment & Support), an open-access platform offering three online SSIs for youth internalizing distress. METHODS: After selecting one of three SSIs to complete, participants (ages 11-17 years) reported pre- and post-SSI levels of clinically relevant outcomes that SSIs may target (eg, hopelessness, self-hate) and perceived SSI acceptability. User-pattern variables, demographics, and depressive symptoms were collected to characterize youths engaging with YES. RESULTS: From September 2019 through March 2020, 694 youths accessed YES, 539 began, and 187 completed a 30-minute, self-guided SSI. SSI completers reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, on average, and were diverse on several dimensions (53.75% non-white; 78.10% female; 43.23% sexual minorities). Regardless of SSI selection, completers reported pre- to post-program reductions in hopelessness (d(av)=0.53; d(z)=0.71), self-hate (d(av)=0.32; d(z)=0.61), perceived control (d(av)=0.60; d(z)=0.72) and agency (d(av)=0.39; d(z)=0.50). Youths rated all SSIs as acceptable (eg, enjoyable, likely to help peers). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the perceived acceptability and utility of open-access, free-of-charge SSIs for youth experiencing internalizing distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework; osf.io/e52p3 JMIR Publications 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7367540/ /pubmed/32602846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513 Text en ©Jessica Lee Schleider, Mallory Dobias, Jenna Sung, Emma Mumper, Michael C Mullarkey. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 30.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Schleider, Jessica Lee Dobias, Mallory Sung, Jenna Mumper, Emma Mullarkey, Michael C Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title | Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title_full | Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title_fullStr | Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title_short | Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health |
title_sort | acceptability and utility of an open-access, online single-session intervention platform for adolescent mental health |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schleiderjessicalee acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth AT dobiasmallory acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth AT sungjenna acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth AT mumperemma acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth AT mullarkeymichaelc acceptabilityandutilityofanopenaccessonlinesinglesessioninterventionplatformforadolescentmentalhealth |