Cargando…

Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has occurred unequally across the United States, potentially contributing to uneven vaccine‐type HPV prevalence between regions. We examined whether emerging vaccine‐related herd protection exhibits regional differences among unvaccinated girls and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berenson, Abbey B., Hirth, Jacqueline M., Chang, Mihyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3125
_version_ 1783560459975131136
author Berenson, Abbey B.
Hirth, Jacqueline M.
Chang, Mihyun
author_facet Berenson, Abbey B.
Hirth, Jacqueline M.
Chang, Mihyun
author_sort Berenson, Abbey B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has occurred unequally across the United States, potentially contributing to uneven vaccine‐type HPV prevalence between regions. We examined whether emerging vaccine‐related herd protection exhibits regional differences among unvaccinated girls and women. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of vaginal HPV among women 14‐59 years of age from 2003 to 2014 using repeated cross‐sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Women who provided an adequate vaginal swab sample were included. Vaginal prevalence of vaccine‐type HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) were examined in four regions of the United States between 2003 and 2014. We examined vaccine‐type HPV prevalence in 2007‐2014 in each US census region among younger participants (14‐34 years old) stratified by vaccination status to determine whether one or both groups contributed to uneven HPV prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 12 175 participants 14‐59 years of age met inclusion criteria. Vaccine‐type HPV prevalence decreased in all regions. Vaccine‐type HPV varied by region only among unvaccinated 14‐34 year olds, with a higher prevalence in the Midwest (13.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7‐17.0) and South (12.5%, 95% CI: 10.2‐14.8) compared to the Northeast (8.9%, 95% CI: 6.5‐11.2). No regional variation in vaccine‐type HPV prevalence was observed among vaccinated participants. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prevalence of vaccine‐type HPV among unvaccinated women in the South and Midwest may contribute to regional disparities in HPV‐related cancer incidence, as emerging herd immunity may not be as strong in those regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73676352020-07-20 Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection Berenson, Abbey B. Hirth, Jacqueline M. Chang, Mihyun Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has occurred unequally across the United States, potentially contributing to uneven vaccine‐type HPV prevalence between regions. We examined whether emerging vaccine‐related herd protection exhibits regional differences among unvaccinated girls and women. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of vaginal HPV among women 14‐59 years of age from 2003 to 2014 using repeated cross‐sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Women who provided an adequate vaginal swab sample were included. Vaginal prevalence of vaccine‐type HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) were examined in four regions of the United States between 2003 and 2014. We examined vaccine‐type HPV prevalence in 2007‐2014 in each US census region among younger participants (14‐34 years old) stratified by vaccination status to determine whether one or both groups contributed to uneven HPV prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 12 175 participants 14‐59 years of age met inclusion criteria. Vaccine‐type HPV prevalence decreased in all regions. Vaccine‐type HPV varied by region only among unvaccinated 14‐34 year olds, with a higher prevalence in the Midwest (13.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7‐17.0) and South (12.5%, 95% CI: 10.2‐14.8) compared to the Northeast (8.9%, 95% CI: 6.5‐11.2). No regional variation in vaccine‐type HPV prevalence was observed among vaccinated participants. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prevalence of vaccine‐type HPV among unvaccinated women in the South and Midwest may contribute to regional disparities in HPV‐related cancer incidence, as emerging herd immunity may not be as strong in those regions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7367635/ /pubmed/32483924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3125 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Berenson, Abbey B.
Hirth, Jacqueline M.
Chang, Mihyun
Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title_full Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title_fullStr Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title_full_unstemmed Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title_short Geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
title_sort geographical disparities in human papillomavirus herd protection
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3125
work_keys_str_mv AT berensonabbeyb geographicaldisparitiesinhumanpapillomavirusherdprotection
AT hirthjacquelinem geographicaldisparitiesinhumanpapillomavirusherdprotection
AT changmihyun geographicaldisparitiesinhumanpapillomavirusherdprotection