Cargando…
Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection
BACKGROUND: National immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Afr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9 |
_version_ | 1783560467917045760 |
---|---|
author | Abbas, Kaja Procter, Simon R van Zandvoort, Kevin Clark, Andrew Funk, Sebastian Mengistu, Tewodaj Hogan, Dan Dansereau, Emily Jit, Mark Flasche, Stefan |
author_facet | Abbas, Kaja Procter, Simon R van Zandvoort, Kevin Clark, Andrew Funk, Sebastian Mengistu, Tewodaj Hogan, Dan Dansereau, Emily Jit, Mark Flasche, Stefan |
author_sort | Abbas, Kaja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: National immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa with the risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through visiting routine vaccination service delivery points. METHODS: We considered a high-impact scenario and a low-impact scenario to approximate the child deaths that could be caused by immunisation coverage reductions during COVID-19 outbreaks. In the high-impact scenario, we used previously reported country-specific child mortality impact estimates of childhood immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, measles, meningitis A, rubella, and yellow fever to approximate the future deaths averted before 5 years of age by routine childhood vaccination during a 6-month COVID-19 risk period without catch-up campaigns. In the low-impact scenario, we approximated the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation on only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 risk period. We assumed that contact-reducing interventions flattened the outbreak curve during the COVID-19 risk period, that 60% of the population will have been infected by the end of that period, that children can be infected by either vaccinators or during transport, and that upon child infection the whole household will be infected. Country-specific household age structure estimates and age-dependent infection-fatality rates were applied to calculate the number of deaths attributable to the vaccination clinic visits. We present benefit–risk ratios for routine childhood immunisation, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. FINDINGS: In the high-impact scenario, for every one excess COVID-19 death attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infections acquired during routine vaccination clinic visits, 84 (95% UI 14–267) deaths in children could be prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa. The benefit–risk ratio for the vaccinated children is 85 000 (4900–546 000), for their siblings (<20 years) is 75 000 (4400–483 000), for their parents or adult carers (aged 20–60 years) is 769 (148–2700), and for older adults (>60 years) is 96 (14–307). In the low-impact scenario that approximates the health benefits to only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks, the benefit–risk ratio to the households of vaccinated children is 3 (0–10); if the risk to only the vaccinated children is considered, the benefit–risk ratio is 3000 (182–21 000). INTERPRETATION: The deaths prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa outweigh the excess risk of COVID-19 deaths associated with vaccination clinic visits, especially for the vaccinated children. Routine childhood immunisation should be sustained in Africa as much as possible, while considering other factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. FUNDING: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7367673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73676732020-07-20 Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection Abbas, Kaja Procter, Simon R van Zandvoort, Kevin Clark, Andrew Funk, Sebastian Mengistu, Tewodaj Hogan, Dan Dansereau, Emily Jit, Mark Flasche, Stefan Lancet Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: National immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa with the risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through visiting routine vaccination service delivery points. METHODS: We considered a high-impact scenario and a low-impact scenario to approximate the child deaths that could be caused by immunisation coverage reductions during COVID-19 outbreaks. In the high-impact scenario, we used previously reported country-specific child mortality impact estimates of childhood immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, measles, meningitis A, rubella, and yellow fever to approximate the future deaths averted before 5 years of age by routine childhood vaccination during a 6-month COVID-19 risk period without catch-up campaigns. In the low-impact scenario, we approximated the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation on only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 risk period. We assumed that contact-reducing interventions flattened the outbreak curve during the COVID-19 risk period, that 60% of the population will have been infected by the end of that period, that children can be infected by either vaccinators or during transport, and that upon child infection the whole household will be infected. Country-specific household age structure estimates and age-dependent infection-fatality rates were applied to calculate the number of deaths attributable to the vaccination clinic visits. We present benefit–risk ratios for routine childhood immunisation, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. FINDINGS: In the high-impact scenario, for every one excess COVID-19 death attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infections acquired during routine vaccination clinic visits, 84 (95% UI 14–267) deaths in children could be prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa. The benefit–risk ratio for the vaccinated children is 85 000 (4900–546 000), for their siblings (<20 years) is 75 000 (4400–483 000), for their parents or adult carers (aged 20–60 years) is 769 (148–2700), and for older adults (>60 years) is 96 (14–307). In the low-impact scenario that approximates the health benefits to only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks, the benefit–risk ratio to the households of vaccinated children is 3 (0–10); if the risk to only the vaccinated children is considered, the benefit–risk ratio is 3000 (182–21 000). INTERPRETATION: The deaths prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa outweigh the excess risk of COVID-19 deaths associated with vaccination clinic visits, especially for the vaccinated children. Routine childhood immunisation should be sustained in Africa as much as possible, while considering other factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. FUNDING: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367673/ /pubmed/32687792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Abbas, Kaja Procter, Simon R van Zandvoort, Kevin Clark, Andrew Funk, Sebastian Mengistu, Tewodaj Hogan, Dan Dansereau, Emily Jit, Mark Flasche, Stefan Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title | Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full | Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_fullStr | Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_short | Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_sort | routine childhood immunisation during the covid-19 pandemic in africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of sars-cov-2 infection |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abbaskaja routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT proctersimonr routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT vanzandvoortkevin routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT clarkandrew routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT funksebastian routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT mengistutewodaj routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT hogandan routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT dansereauemily routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT jitmark routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT flaschestefan routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection AT routinechildhoodimmunisationduringthecovid19pandemicinafricaabenefitriskanalysisofhealthbenefitsversusexcessriskofsarscov2infection |