Cargando…
Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer
Responses to immunotherapy are uncommon in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and to date, lack predictive markers. This randomized phase II study defines safety and response rate of epigenetic priming in ER-positive breast cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors as primary end...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17414-y |
_version_ | 1783560505043976192 |
---|---|
author | Terranova-Barberio, Manuela Pawlowska, Nela Dhawan, Mallika Moasser, Mark Chien, Amy J. Melisko, Michelle E. Rugo, Hope Rahimi, Roshun Deal, Travis Daud, Adil Rosenblum, Michael D. Thomas, Scott Munster, Pamela N. |
author_facet | Terranova-Barberio, Manuela Pawlowska, Nela Dhawan, Mallika Moasser, Mark Chien, Amy J. Melisko, Michelle E. Rugo, Hope Rahimi, Roshun Deal, Travis Daud, Adil Rosenblum, Michael D. Thomas, Scott Munster, Pamela N. |
author_sort | Terranova-Barberio, Manuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Responses to immunotherapy are uncommon in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and to date, lack predictive markers. This randomized phase II study defines safety and response rate of epigenetic priming in ER-positive breast cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors as primary endpoints. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included PD-L1 modulation and T-cell immune-signatures. 34 patients received vorinostat, tamoxifen and pembrolizumab with no excessive toxicity after progression on a median of five prior metastatic regimens. Objective response was 4% and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD > 6 m) was 19%. T-cell exhaustion (CD8(+ )PD-1(+)/CTLA-4(+)) and treatment-induced depletion of regulatory T-cells (CD4(+) Foxp3(+)/CTLA-4(+)) was seen in tumor or blood in 5/5 patients with clinical benefit, but only in one non-responder. Tumor lymphocyte infiltration was 0.17%. Only two non-responders had PD-L1 expression >1%. This data defines a novel immune signature in PD-L1-negative ER-positive breast cancer patients who are more likely to benefit from immune-checkpoint and histone deacetylase inhibition (NCT02395627). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7367885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73678852020-07-21 Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer Terranova-Barberio, Manuela Pawlowska, Nela Dhawan, Mallika Moasser, Mark Chien, Amy J. Melisko, Michelle E. Rugo, Hope Rahimi, Roshun Deal, Travis Daud, Adil Rosenblum, Michael D. Thomas, Scott Munster, Pamela N. Nat Commun Article Responses to immunotherapy are uncommon in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and to date, lack predictive markers. This randomized phase II study defines safety and response rate of epigenetic priming in ER-positive breast cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors as primary endpoints. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included PD-L1 modulation and T-cell immune-signatures. 34 patients received vorinostat, tamoxifen and pembrolizumab with no excessive toxicity after progression on a median of five prior metastatic regimens. Objective response was 4% and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD > 6 m) was 19%. T-cell exhaustion (CD8(+ )PD-1(+)/CTLA-4(+)) and treatment-induced depletion of regulatory T-cells (CD4(+) Foxp3(+)/CTLA-4(+)) was seen in tumor or blood in 5/5 patients with clinical benefit, but only in one non-responder. Tumor lymphocyte infiltration was 0.17%. Only two non-responders had PD-L1 expression >1%. This data defines a novel immune signature in PD-L1-negative ER-positive breast cancer patients who are more likely to benefit from immune-checkpoint and histone deacetylase inhibition (NCT02395627). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367885/ /pubmed/32681091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17414-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Terranova-Barberio, Manuela Pawlowska, Nela Dhawan, Mallika Moasser, Mark Chien, Amy J. Melisko, Michelle E. Rugo, Hope Rahimi, Roshun Deal, Travis Daud, Adil Rosenblum, Michael D. Thomas, Scott Munster, Pamela N. Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title | Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title_full | Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title_short | Exhausted T cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in ER-positive breast cancer |
title_sort | exhausted t cell signature predicts immunotherapy response in er-positive breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17414-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terranovabarberiomanuela exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT pawlowskanela exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT dhawanmallika exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT moassermark exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT chienamyj exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT meliskomichellee exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT rugohope exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT rahimiroshun exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT dealtravis exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT daudadil exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT rosenblummichaeld exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT thomasscott exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer AT munsterpamelan exhaustedtcellsignaturepredictsimmunotherapyresponseinerpositivebreastcancer |