Cargando…

Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models

Three global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods (Morris, Sobol and extended Sobol) are applied to a minimal physiologically based PK (mPBPK) model using three model drugs given orally, namely quinidine, alprazolam, and midazolam. We investigated how correlations among input parameters affect the det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Dan, Li, Linzhong, Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin, Bois, Frederic Y., Jamei, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x
_version_ 1783560511059656704
author Liu, Dan
Li, Linzhong
Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin
Bois, Frederic Y.
Jamei, Masoud
author_facet Liu, Dan
Li, Linzhong
Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin
Bois, Frederic Y.
Jamei, Masoud
author_sort Liu, Dan
collection PubMed
description Three global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods (Morris, Sobol and extended Sobol) are applied to a minimal physiologically based PK (mPBPK) model using three model drugs given orally, namely quinidine, alprazolam, and midazolam. We investigated how correlations among input parameters affect the determination of the key parameters influencing pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of general interest, i.e., the maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) time at which C(max) is reached (T(max)), and area under plasma concentration (AUC). The influential parameters determined by the Morris and Sobol methods (suitable for independent model parameters) were compared to those determined by the extended Sobol method (which considers model parameter correlations). For the three drugs investigated, the Morris method was as informative as the Sobol method. The extended Sobol method identified different sets of influential parameters to Morris and Sobol. These methods overestimated the influence of volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) on AUC24h for quinidine and alprazolam. They also underestimated the effect of volume of liver (V(liver)) for all three drugs, the impact of enzyme intrinsic clearance of CYP2C9 and CYP2E1 for quinidine, and that of UGT1A4 abundance for midazolam. Our investigation showed that the interpretation of GSA results is not straightforward. Dismissing existing model parameter correlations, GSA methods such as Morris and Sobol can lead to biased determination of the key parameters for the selected outputs of interest. Decisions regarding parameters’ influence (or otherwise) should be made in light of available knowledge including the model assumptions, GSA method limitations, and inter-correlations between model parameters, particularly in complex models. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7367914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73679142020-07-21 Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Liu, Dan Li, Linzhong Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin Bois, Frederic Y. Jamei, Masoud AAPS J Research Article Three global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods (Morris, Sobol and extended Sobol) are applied to a minimal physiologically based PK (mPBPK) model using three model drugs given orally, namely quinidine, alprazolam, and midazolam. We investigated how correlations among input parameters affect the determination of the key parameters influencing pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of general interest, i.e., the maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) time at which C(max) is reached (T(max)), and area under plasma concentration (AUC). The influential parameters determined by the Morris and Sobol methods (suitable for independent model parameters) were compared to those determined by the extended Sobol method (which considers model parameter correlations). For the three drugs investigated, the Morris method was as informative as the Sobol method. The extended Sobol method identified different sets of influential parameters to Morris and Sobol. These methods overestimated the influence of volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) on AUC24h for quinidine and alprazolam. They also underestimated the effect of volume of liver (V(liver)) for all three drugs, the impact of enzyme intrinsic clearance of CYP2C9 and CYP2E1 for quinidine, and that of UGT1A4 abundance for midazolam. Our investigation showed that the interpretation of GSA results is not straightforward. Dismissing existing model parameter correlations, GSA methods such as Morris and Sobol can lead to biased determination of the key parameters for the selected outputs of interest. Decisions regarding parameters’ influence (or otherwise) should be made in light of available knowledge including the model assumptions, GSA method limitations, and inter-correlations between model parameters, particularly in complex models. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7367914/ /pubmed/32681207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Dan
Li, Linzhong
Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin
Bois, Frederic Y.
Jamei, Masoud
Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title_full Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title_fullStr Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title_full_unstemmed Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title_short Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
title_sort considerations and caveats when applying global sensitivity analysis methods to physiologically based pharmacokinetic models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-020-00480-x
work_keys_str_mv AT liudan considerationsandcaveatswhenapplyingglobalsensitivityanalysismethodstophysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticmodels
AT lilinzhong considerationsandcaveatswhenapplyingglobalsensitivityanalysismethodstophysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticmodels
AT rostamihodjeganamin considerationsandcaveatswhenapplyingglobalsensitivityanalysismethodstophysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticmodels
AT boisfredericy considerationsandcaveatswhenapplyingglobalsensitivityanalysismethodstophysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticmodels
AT jameimasoud considerationsandcaveatswhenapplyingglobalsensitivityanalysismethodstophysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticmodels