Cargando…
Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765084 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410 |
_version_ | 1783560620535185408 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Lijuan Li, Jinhua |
author_facet | Yin, Lijuan Li, Jinhua |
author_sort | Yin, Lijuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the costs and complications between peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and PCs. METHODS: Overall, 777 colorectal cancer patients (89%) were eligible for central venous catheter (CVC) insertions from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. We retrospectively compared the costs and complications following the introduction of PICCs and PCs in the infusion of intravenous chemotherapy agents in patients with colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 773 colorectal patients were enrolled. The total cost of PICC and PC was US $436.20 and US $976, respectively. The complication rate was higher in the PICC compared with the PC group (45% versus 4%, P <0.001). The late complication rate of the two groups was particularly pronounced (52% versus 7%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of total complications, that were developed in patients, with and without hemostatic prophylaxis, was 0.7% versus 5.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Port devices are associated with higher costs but fewer complications, compared to PICC in patients with colorectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7368562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73685622020-08-05 Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? Yin, Lijuan Li, Jinhua Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the costs and complications between peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and PCs. METHODS: Overall, 777 colorectal cancer patients (89%) were eligible for central venous catheter (CVC) insertions from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. We retrospectively compared the costs and complications following the introduction of PICCs and PCs in the infusion of intravenous chemotherapy agents in patients with colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 773 colorectal patients were enrolled. The total cost of PICC and PC was US $436.20 and US $976, respectively. The complication rate was higher in the PICC compared with the PC group (45% versus 4%, P <0.001). The late complication rate of the two groups was particularly pronounced (52% versus 7%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of total complications, that were developed in patients, with and without hemostatic prophylaxis, was 0.7% versus 5.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Port devices are associated with higher costs but fewer complications, compared to PICC in patients with colorectal cancer. Dove 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7368562/ /pubmed/32765084 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410 Text en © 2020 Yin and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yin, Lijuan Li, Jinhua Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title | Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title_full | Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title_fullStr | Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title_full_unstemmed | Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title_short | Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? |
title_sort | central venous catheter insertion in colorectal cancer patients, picc or pc? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765084 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinlijuan centralvenouscatheterinsertionincolorectalcancerpatientspiccorpc AT lijinhua centralvenouscatheterinsertionincolorectalcancerpatientspiccorpc |