Cargando…

Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?

PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Lijuan, Li, Jinhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765084
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410
_version_ 1783560620535185408
author Yin, Lijuan
Li, Jinhua
author_facet Yin, Lijuan
Li, Jinhua
author_sort Yin, Lijuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the costs and complications between peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and PCs. METHODS: Overall, 777 colorectal cancer patients (89%) were eligible for central venous catheter (CVC) insertions from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. We retrospectively compared the costs and complications following the introduction of PICCs and PCs in the infusion of intravenous chemotherapy agents in patients with colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 773 colorectal patients were enrolled. The total cost of PICC and PC was US $436.20 and US $976, respectively. The complication rate was higher in the PICC compared with the PC group (45% versus 4%, P <0.001). The late complication rate of the two groups was particularly pronounced (52% versus 7%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of total complications, that were developed in patients, with and without hemostatic prophylaxis, was 0.7% versus 5.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Port devices are associated with higher costs but fewer complications, compared to PICC in patients with colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7368562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73685622020-08-05 Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC? Yin, Lijuan Li, Jinhua Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) have been demonstrated as a feasible method for chemotherapy delivery in colorectal cancer patients. The objective of our study was to explore the preference of colorectal cancer patients (89%) in our institution for port catheters (PCs) through comparing the costs and complications between peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and PCs. METHODS: Overall, 777 colorectal cancer patients (89%) were eligible for central venous catheter (CVC) insertions from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. We retrospectively compared the costs and complications following the introduction of PICCs and PCs in the infusion of intravenous chemotherapy agents in patients with colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 773 colorectal patients were enrolled. The total cost of PICC and PC was US $436.20 and US $976, respectively. The complication rate was higher in the PICC compared with the PC group (45% versus 4%, P <0.001). The late complication rate of the two groups was particularly pronounced (52% versus 7%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of total complications, that were developed in patients, with and without hemostatic prophylaxis, was 0.7% versus 5.7% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Port devices are associated with higher costs but fewer complications, compared to PICC in patients with colorectal cancer. Dove 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7368562/ /pubmed/32765084 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410 Text en © 2020 Yin and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yin, Lijuan
Li, Jinhua
Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title_full Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title_fullStr Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title_full_unstemmed Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title_short Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Colorectal Cancer Patients, PICC or PC?
title_sort central venous catheter insertion in colorectal cancer patients, picc or pc?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765084
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250410
work_keys_str_mv AT yinlijuan centralvenouscatheterinsertionincolorectalcancerpatientspiccorpc
AT lijinhua centralvenouscatheterinsertionincolorectalcancerpatientspiccorpc