Cargando…

Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer clinical management requires the assessment of hormone receptors (estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and cellular proliferation index Ki67, by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in order to choose and guide therapy accord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rey-Vargas, Laura, Mejía-Henao, Juan Carlos, Sanabria-Salas, María Carolina, Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07179-4
_version_ 1783560642966323200
author Rey-Vargas, Laura
Mejía-Henao, Juan Carlos
Sanabria-Salas, María Carolina
Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J.
author_facet Rey-Vargas, Laura
Mejía-Henao, Juan Carlos
Sanabria-Salas, María Carolina
Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J.
author_sort Rey-Vargas, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer clinical management requires the assessment of hormone receptors (estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and cellular proliferation index Ki67, by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in order to choose and guide therapy according to tumor biology. Many studies have reported contradictory results regarding changes in the biomarker profile after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Given its clinical implications for the disease management, we aimed to analyze changes in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression in paired core-needle biopsies and surgical samples in breast cancer patients that had either been treated or not with NAT. METHODS: We included 139 patients with confirmed diagnosis of invasive ductal breast carcinoma from the Colombian National Cancer Institute. Variation in biomarker profile were assessed according to NAT administration (NAT and no-NAT treated cases) and NAT scheme (hormonal, cytotoxic, cytotoxic + trastuzumab, combined). Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to identify changes in biomarker status and percentage expression, respectively, in the corresponding groups. RESULTS: We did not find any significant variations in biomarker status or expression values in the no-NAT group. In cases previously treated with NAT, we did find a statistically significant decrease in Ki67 (p < 0.001) and PR (p = 0.02605) expression. When changes were evaluated according to NAT scheme, we found a significant decrease in both Ki67 status (p = 0.02977) and its expression values (p < 0.001) in cases that received the cytotoxic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PR and Ki67 expression can be altered by NAT administration, whereas cases not previously treated with NAT do not present IHC biomarker profile variations. The re-evaluation of these two biomarkers after NAT could provide valuable information regarding treatment response and prognosis for breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7368678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73686782020-07-20 Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile Rey-Vargas, Laura Mejía-Henao, Juan Carlos Sanabria-Salas, María Carolina Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer clinical management requires the assessment of hormone receptors (estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and cellular proliferation index Ki67, by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in order to choose and guide therapy according to tumor biology. Many studies have reported contradictory results regarding changes in the biomarker profile after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Given its clinical implications for the disease management, we aimed to analyze changes in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression in paired core-needle biopsies and surgical samples in breast cancer patients that had either been treated or not with NAT. METHODS: We included 139 patients with confirmed diagnosis of invasive ductal breast carcinoma from the Colombian National Cancer Institute. Variation in biomarker profile were assessed according to NAT administration (NAT and no-NAT treated cases) and NAT scheme (hormonal, cytotoxic, cytotoxic + trastuzumab, combined). Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to identify changes in biomarker status and percentage expression, respectively, in the corresponding groups. RESULTS: We did not find any significant variations in biomarker status or expression values in the no-NAT group. In cases previously treated with NAT, we did find a statistically significant decrease in Ki67 (p < 0.001) and PR (p = 0.02605) expression. When changes were evaluated according to NAT scheme, we found a significant decrease in both Ki67 status (p = 0.02977) and its expression values (p < 0.001) in cases that received the cytotoxic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PR and Ki67 expression can be altered by NAT administration, whereas cases not previously treated with NAT do not present IHC biomarker profile variations. The re-evaluation of these two biomarkers after NAT could provide valuable information regarding treatment response and prognosis for breast cancer patients. BioMed Central 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7368678/ /pubmed/32682413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07179-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rey-Vargas, Laura
Mejía-Henao, Juan Carlos
Sanabria-Salas, María Carolina
Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J.
Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title_full Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title_fullStr Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title_full_unstemmed Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title_short Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
title_sort effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07179-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reyvargaslaura effectofneoadjuvanttherapyonbreastcancerbiomarkerprofile
AT mejiahenaojuancarlos effectofneoadjuvanttherapyonbreastcancerbiomarkerprofile
AT sanabriasalasmariacarolina effectofneoadjuvanttherapyonbreastcancerbiomarkerprofile
AT serranogomezsilviaj effectofneoadjuvanttherapyonbreastcancerbiomarkerprofile